INT101140

From wiki-pain
Jump to: navigation, search
Context Info
Confidence 0.50
First Reported 2002
Last Reported 2010
Negated 0
Speculated 1
Reported most in Body
Documents 7
Total Number 25
Disease Relevance 9.08
Pain Relevance 17.46

This is a graph with borders and nodes. Maybe there is an Imagemap used so the nodes may be linking to some Pages.

transport (Tap1) mitochondrion (Tap1) endoplasmic reticulum (Tap1)
ATPase activity (Tap1) plasma membrane (Tap1) transmembrane transport (Tap1)
Anatomy Link Frequency
D-17 6
nerve 1
D 17 1
sensory nerves 1
external oblique 1
Tap1 (Mus musculus)
Pain Link Frequency Relevance Heat
depression 22 100.00 Very High Very High Very High
Pain 432 99.60 Very High Very High Very High
Analgesic 306 99.60 Very High Very High Very High
fluoxetine 22 99.50 Very High Very High Very High
ilioinguinal nerve 36 99.48 Very High Very High Very High
anesthesia 234 99.40 Very High Very High Very High
Morphine 108 97.86 Very High Very High Very High
analgesia 144 97.52 Very High Very High Very High
nerve block 54 97.36 Very High Very High Very High
local anesthetic 288 97.28 Very High Very High Very High
Disease Link Frequency Relevance Heat
Depression 32 100.00 Very High Very High Very High
Pain 450 99.60 Very High Very High Very High
Anxiety Disorder 32 98.24 Very High Very High Very High
Obsessive-compulsive Disorder 2 98.14 Very High Very High Very High
Panic Disorder 4 93.68 High High
Neurosis 3 87.76 High High
Infection 90 84.00 Quite High
Paralysis 36 84.00 Quite High
Hemorrhage 54 83.56 Quite High
Pneumoperitoneum 72 83.16 Quite High

Sentences Mentioned In

Key: Protein Mutation Event Anatomy Negation Speculation Pain term Disease term
Remission and response of depression were defined as a 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D-17) score <or=7 and a HAM-D-17 decrease >or=50%, respectively.
Negative_regulation (decrease) of HAM-D-17 in D-17
1) Confidence 0.50 Published 2005 Journal Psychother Psychosom Section Body Doc Link 16244512 Disease Relevance 0.09 Pain Relevance 0
In this study, we have compared the analgesic effect of levobupivacaine concentration after a laparoscopic cholecystectomy by performing a US-TAP block with 0.25% and 0.5% of levobupivacaine, 15 ml each for the left and the right, at a total of 30 ml, on the patients for whom the operation was performed under general anesthesia.


Negative_regulation (block) of TAP associated with anesthesia and analgesic
2) Confidence 0.40 Published 2010 Journal Korean Journal of Anesthesiology Section Body Doc Link PMC2876857 Disease Relevance 0.14 Pain Relevance 0.53
No complications related to the US-TAP block were observed.


Negative_regulation (block) of TAP
3) Confidence 0.40 Published 2010 Journal Korean Journal of Anesthesiology Section Abstract Doc Link PMC2876857 Disease Relevance 0.33 Pain Relevance 0.52
As a result of the postoperative analgesia by means of IV-PCA, the morphine use for 24 hours after the operation was significantly less in the group of patients who underwent the US-TAP block after general anesthesia than that of the group of patients who underwent general anesthesia only.
Negative_regulation (block) of TAP associated with anesthesia, morphine and analgesia
4) Confidence 0.40 Published 2010 Journal Korean Journal of Anesthesiology Section Body Doc Link PMC2876857 Disease Relevance 0.12 Pain Relevance 1.13
In this study, we have compared the analgesic effect by performing the US-TAP block through injecting 0.25% and 0.5% of levobupivacaine, 15 ml each for the left and the right, at a total of 30 ml, after a laparoscopic cholecystectomy under general anesthesia.
Negative_regulation (block) of TAP associated with anesthesia and analgesic
5) Confidence 0.40 Published 2010 Journal Korean Journal of Anesthesiology Section Body Doc Link PMC2876857 Disease Relevance 0.34 Pain Relevance 0.47
"Pop" technique is applied not only in the TAP block but also in ilioinguinal nerve and iliohypogastric nerve blocks [20].
Negative_regulation (block) of TAP in nerve associated with ilioinguinal nerve
6) Confidence 0.40 Published 2010 Journal Korean Journal of Anesthesiology Section Body Doc Link PMC2876857 Disease Relevance 0.20 Pain Relevance 0.78
The total dose of remifentanil used during the operation and the amount of analgesics used in the recovery room after the operation were also remarkably lower in the Group B0.25 and Group B0.5 than the Group Control, indicating that the US-TAP block had a good analgesic effect after laparoscopic cholecystectomy until 24 hours.
Negative_regulation (block) of TAP associated with analgesic and ultiva
7) Confidence 0.40 Published 2010 Journal Korean Journal of Anesthesiology Section Body Doc Link PMC2876857 Disease Relevance 0.28 Pain Relevance 0.69
The TAP block is simple and the effect lasts long after the operation.
Negative_regulation (block) of TAP
8) Confidence 0.40 Published 2010 Journal Korean Journal of Anesthesiology Section Body Doc Link PMC2876857 Disease Relevance 0.20 Pain Relevance 0.62
When the vital signs were stabilized after endotracheal intubation, the TAP block was performed through ultrasound (SonoSite M-Turbo®, Sonosite, USA) guided method.
Negative_regulation (block) of TAP
9) Confidence 0.40 Published 2010 Journal Korean Journal of Anesthesiology Section Body Doc Link PMC2876857 Disease Relevance 0.07 Pain Relevance 0.31
In our study, the US-TAP block was performed at both left and right sides with 0.25% and 0.5% levobupivacaine 15 ml for each side, and the pain control was medicated depending on the VNRS and the request of the patients to control the pain, not generally conducting the postoperative analgesia by means of IV-PCA.
Negative_regulation (block) of TAP associated with pain and analgesia
10) Confidence 0.40 Published 2010 Journal Korean Journal of Anesthesiology Section Body Doc Link PMC2876857 Disease Relevance 0.19 Pain Relevance 1.25
Although the same conclusion that the US-TAP block has good analgesic effect after a laparoscopic cholecystectomy was derived from both of the studies, our result cannot be compared with that of El-Dawlatly et al. [18], since VNRS was not assessed in their study.
Negative_regulation (block) of TAP associated with analgesic
11) Confidence 0.40 Published 2010 Journal Korean Journal of Anesthesiology Section Body Doc Link PMC2876857 Disease Relevance 0.35 Pain Relevance 1.34
El-Dawlatly et al. [18] compared the group of patients to which 0.5% bupivacaine 15 ml was injected at both left and right sides by means of the US-TAP block after general anesthesia to the control group.
Negative_regulation (block) of TAP associated with anesthesia
12) Confidence 0.40 Published 2010 Journal Korean Journal of Anesthesiology Section Body Doc Link PMC2876857 Disease Relevance 0.07 Pain Relevance 1.04
The US-TAP block was performed by one skilled anesthesiologist.
Negative_regulation (block) of TAP
13) Confidence 0.40 Published 2010 Journal Korean Journal of Anesthesiology Section Body Doc Link PMC2876857 Disease Relevance 0.30 Pain Relevance 0.60
Both the Group B0.25 and Group B0.5 that underwent the US-TAP block showed a significantly lower VNRS than that of the Group Control, as assessed at 20 min, 30 min, 60 min, 6 hr, 12 hr, and 24 hr after the operation.
Negative_regulation (block) of TAP
14) Confidence 0.40 Published 2010 Journal Korean Journal of Anesthesiology Section Body Doc Link PMC2876857 Disease Relevance 0.30 Pain Relevance 0.55
As a result of the postoperative analgesia by means of IV-PCA, the morphine use until 24 hours after the operation was significantly less in the group of patients who underwent the US-TAP block after general anesthesia than that of the group of patients who underwent general anesthesia only.
Negative_regulation (block) of TAP associated with anesthesia, morphine and analgesia
15) Confidence 0.40 Published 2010 Journal Korean Journal of Anesthesiology Section Body Doc Link PMC2876857 Disease Relevance 0.15 Pain Relevance 1.23
Thus, though the US-TAP block can be an effective analgesic method, further research is needed to investigate whether it is more efficient than IV-PCA and what effects can be drawn by the combination method of both of them.
Negative_regulation (block) of TAP associated with analgesic
16) Confidence 0.40 Published 2010 Journal Korean Journal of Anesthesiology Section Body Doc Link PMC2876857 Disease Relevance 0.57 Pain Relevance 1.42
Therefore, we have applied a ultrasound for the TAP block by the in-plane technique, having the linear probe positioned at the Petit triangle, as described by Walter et al. [21].
Negative_regulation (block) of TAP
17) Confidence 0.40 Published 2010 Journal Korean Journal of Anesthesiology Section Body Doc Link PMC2876857 Disease Relevance 0.16 Pain Relevance 0.64
Firstly described by Rafi [10], the transverse abdominis plane block (TAP block) enables pain control through blocking sensory nerves by injecting local anesthetics into the neurofascial plane in the abdominal muscle.
Negative_regulation (block) of TAP in sensory nerves associated with pain and local anesthetic
18) Confidence 0.35 Published 2010 Journal Korean Journal of Anesthesiology Section Body Doc Link PMC2876857 Disease Relevance 0.86 Pain Relevance 1.52
The conventional TAP block is performed at the so-called "triangle of Petit", which is bounded posteriorly by the lattisimus dorsi muscle, anteriorly by the external oblique muscle (EOM), inferiorly by the iliac crest [11], by advancing the needle for a "pop" or "double pop", the sensation of puncturing fascia, to inject the local anesthetics, without knowing the inner structure of the abdominal cavity and the injection site [12-14].
Negative_regulation (block) of TAP in external oblique associated with local anesthetic
19) Confidence 0.35 Published 2010 Journal Korean Journal of Anesthesiology Section Body Doc Link PMC2876857 Disease Relevance 0.80 Pain Relevance 1.39
With the use of a multiple regression we also tested whether BHS scores at baseline predicted HAM-D-17 scores at endpoint, controlling for HAM-D-17 scores at baseline.
Spec (whether) Negative_regulation (predicted) of HAM-D-17 in D-17
20) Confidence 0.33 Published 2007 Journal Ann Clin Psychiatry Section Body Doc Link 17453655 Disease Relevance 0.08 Pain Relevance 0

General Comments

This test has worked.

Personal tools
Namespaces

Variants
Actions
Navigation
Toolbox