INT104441

From wiki-pain
Jump to: navigation, search
Context Info
Confidence 0.42
First Reported 2002
Last Reported 2011
Negated 11
Speculated 3
Reported most in Body
Documents 72
Total Number 75
Disease Relevance 16.41
Pain Relevance 10.51

This is a graph with borders and nodes. Maybe there is an Imagemap used so the nodes may be linking to some Pages.

RNA binding (NOVA2) nucleus (NOVA2)
Anatomy Link Frequency
dendrites 2
muscle 2
bars 1
testis 1
fat 1
NOVA2 (Homo sapiens)
Pain Link Frequency Relevance Heat
fluoxetine 70 100.00 Very High Very High Very High
Ultiva 16 100.00 Very High Very High Very High
Anterior cingulate cortex 272 99.96 Very High Very High Very High
Pain 643 99.84 Very High Very High Very High
midbrain 9 99.16 Very High Very High Very High
Nicotine 182 98.40 Very High Very High Very High
alcohol 83 97.56 Very High Very High Very High
Sciatic nerve 231 97.48 Very High Very High Very High
cocaine 135 97.40 Very High Very High Very High
Dopamine 205 97.04 Very High Very High Very High
Disease Link Frequency Relevance Heat
Targeted Disruption 567 100.00 Very High Very High Very High
Affective Disorder 135 100.00 Very High Very High Very High
Sprains And Strains 187 99.98 Very High Very High Very High
Pain 637 99.84 Very High Very High Very High
Adhesions 9 99.30 Very High Very High Very High
Shock 168 99.08 Very High Very High Very High
Body Weight 142 98.68 Very High Very High Very High
Birth Weight 33 97.52 Very High Very High Very High
Injury 149 97.16 Very High Very High Very High
Nervous System Injury 96 95.28 Very High Very High Very High

Sentences Mentioned In

Key: Protein Mutation Event Anatomy Negation Speculation Pain term Disease term
The overall group-by-time interaction for the ANOVA was statistically significant for the LEFS (P = .002), FAAM (P = .005), and pain (P = .043).
ANOVA Binding (interaction) of
1) Confidence 0.42 Published 2009 Journal J Orthop Sports Phys Ther Section Body Doc Link 19687575 Disease Relevance 0 Pain Relevance 0
The ANOVA revealed the main effect of phase(p < 0.001), but did not show the main effect of observation condition or the interaction between these two main effects.
ANOVA Binding (interaction) of
2) Confidence 0.37 Published 2007 Journal J Neuroeng Rehabil Section Body Doc Link PMC2072956 Disease Relevance 0.08 Pain Relevance 0
Due to lost animals in the experiment with NIH mice, similar analyses could not be performed, and a one way ANOVA was run only on the data with 10 ?
ANOVA Binding (way) of
3) Confidence 0.36 Published 2005 Journal BMC Immunol Section Body Doc Link PMC1182367 Disease Relevance 0.32 Pain Relevance 0.08
RESULTS: The ANOVA revealed significant group x time interaction for changes in PPTs over the upper trapezius (F = 4.5; P = .01) and masseter (F = 6.3; P = .002) muscles.
ANOVA Binding (interaction) of in muscles
4) Confidence 0.36 Published 2010 Journal J Manipulative Physiol Ther Section Body Doc Link 20114099 Disease Relevance 0.07 Pain Relevance 0
RESULTS: The 2-by-3 mixed-model ANOVA revealed a significant group-by-time interaction for changes in pressure pain thresholds over masseter (P<.01) and temporalis (P = .003) muscle latent TrPs and also for active mouth opening (P<.001) in favor of the manipulative and soft tissue groups.
ANOVA Binding (interaction) of in masseter
5) Confidence 0.35 Published 2010 Journal J Orthop Sports Phys Ther Section Body Doc Link 20436241 Disease Relevance 0 Pain Relevance 0
4.674, two-way 2×2 ANOVA on ranks), and crucially, a significant interaction between the two factors (N?
ANOVA Binding (interaction) of
6) Confidence 0.32 Published 2009 Journal PLoS ONE Section Body Doc Link PMC2734169 Disease Relevance 0 Pain Relevance 0
For the A-P axis, the ANOVA revealed an interaction of Pain by Sensory conditions (p < 0.05) and main effects of Pain (p < 0.001) and Sensory conditions (p < 0.001).
ANOVA Binding (interaction) of associated with pain
7) Confidence 0.31 Published 2003 Journal BMC Musculoskelet Disord Section Body Doc Link PMC270027 Disease Relevance 1.17 Pain Relevance 1.17
For the standard deviation of the CP velocity along the A-P axis, the ANOVA revealed an interaction of Pain by Sensory conditions (p < 0.05) and main effects of Pain (p < 0.05) and Sensory conditions (p < 0.001).
ANOVA Binding (interaction) of associated with pain
8) Confidence 0.31 Published 2003 Journal BMC Musculoskelet Disord Section Body Doc Link PMC270027 Disease Relevance 0.90 Pain Relevance 0.90
ANOVA revealed a significant lowering of MT after training (F(1,14) = 9.000, p = 0.010 for the factor "training"), but without significant influence of the factor "drug" (F(1,14) = 0.072, p = 0.793), and without significant interaction between both factors (F(1,14) = 0.111, p = 0.744).
ANOVA Binding (interaction) of
9) Confidence 0.29 Published 2005 Journal BMC Neurosci Section Body Doc Link PMC1134663 Disease Relevance 0 Pain Relevance 0
To explore the main effects and a possible interaction for the three provocations in the post Remifentanil period a repeated measures ANOVA was perfomed for T3–T5 (between subjects factor was COMTval158met genotype, within subjects factor was the three different timepoints).
ANOVA Spec (possible) Binding (interaction) of associated with ultiva
10) Confidence 0.28 Published 2009 Journal PLoS ONE Section Body Doc Link PMC2695541 Disease Relevance 0.42 Pain Relevance 0.82
Repeated measures ANOVA for factors GROUP and SESSION revealed no significant interactions for the time to complete the task (F(3,60) =1.330, p = 0.273) and the number of errors (F(3,60) = 0.550, p = 0.650).
ANOVA Neg (no) Binding (interactions) of
11) Confidence 0.27 Published 2008 Journal Clinical Interventions in Aging Section Body Doc Link PMC2682400 Disease Relevance 0.07 Pain Relevance 0
Repeated measures ANOVA for factors GROUP and SESSION revealed no significant interactions for the time to fulfill the standard peg-board test (F(2,40) =1.528, p = 0.229) and the demanding test form (F(2,40) =1.510, p = 0.223).
ANOVA Neg (no) Binding (interactions) of
12) Confidence 0.27 Published 2008 Journal Clinical Interventions in Aging Section Body Doc Link PMC2682400 Disease Relevance 0 Pain Relevance 0
Repeated measures ANOVA for factors GROUP and SESSION revealed no significant interactions for number of mislocalizations on the first neighbor (F(3,42) =1.945, p = 0.137), on the second neighbor (F(3,42) = 0.851, p = 0.477) and on the fourth neighbor (F(3,42) = 1.010, p = 0.451), but on the third neighbor (F(3,42) = 9.085, p = 0.001).
ANOVA Neg (no) Binding (interactions) of
13) Confidence 0.27 Published 2008 Journal Clinical Interventions in Aging Section Body Doc Link PMC2682400 Disease Relevance 0 Pain Relevance 0
To reduce number of genes in the multivariate analysis and thus the skewness of the dataset, genes with p < 0.1 for time × treatment interaction in the ANOVA (3355 genes) were selected and analyzed further using PLS-DA using Matlab Version 7.0.4 R14 (The Mathworks, Inc.) as described below under Multivariate analysis of 'omics' data.
ANOVA Binding (interaction) of
14) Confidence 0.21 Published 2010 Journal BMC Med Genomics Section Body Doc Link PMC2837611 Disease Relevance 0 Pain Relevance 0.04
Secondary analysis also included a repeated measures ANOVA mixed model with SIGH-SAD as dependent variable and time, treatment, and interaction of time and treatment as fixed effects, including all randomized participants.
ANOVA Binding (interaction) of associated with affective disorder
15) Confidence 0.21 Published 2007 Journal BMC Psychiatry Section Body Doc Link PMC1971065 Disease Relevance 0.51 Pain Relevance 0
Analysis of SIGH-SAD scores with a repeated measures ANOVA indicated a significant effect of time (F (1,115) = 71.2, p < 0.0001) and a significant interaction of treatment and time (F(1,115) = 5.30, p = 0.023).
ANOVA Binding (interaction) of associated with affective disorder
16) Confidence 0.21 Published 2007 Journal BMC Psychiatry Section Body Doc Link PMC1971065 Disease Relevance 0.61 Pain Relevance 0
The related‘t’ test was used to find intragroup and ANOVA was used to find intergroup differences in pre and post protocol.
ANOVA Binding (find) of
17) Confidence 0.20 Published 2010 Journal International Journal of Ayurveda Research Section Body Doc Link PMC2996571 Disease Relevance 0 Pain Relevance 0
In the studied population, 35 neurons (61%) were sensitive to visual quantity (ANOVA, p < 0.05), and for the vast majority, (34/35, 97%), activity did not depend on which number served as standard or deviant (ANOVA, number × standard interaction, p > 0.05), thus effectively ruling out reward expectation or stimulus salience as factors modulating response to the numerical cue.
ANOVA Binding (interaction) of in neurons
18) Confidence 0.18 Published 2007 Journal PLoS Biology Section Body Doc Link PMC1925133 Disease Relevance 0 Pain Relevance 0
ANOVA revealed a significant interaction between the group factor and treatment condition with F(21,1) = 4.120 and P = .023.
ANOVA Binding (interaction) of
19) Confidence 0.18 Published 2011 Journal Evidence-based Complementary and Alternative Medicine : eCAM Section Body Doc Link PMC2952335 Disease Relevance 0.33 Pain Relevance 0.54
RESULTS: The ANOVA revealed a statistically significant muscle-by-exercise interaction (P<.05) for both phases, which showed that the 3 exercises; recruited the 5 muscle sites using different patterns of relative amplitudes.
ANOVA Binding (interaction) of in muscle
20) Confidence 0.17 Published 2002 Journal Arch Phys Med Rehabil Section Body Doc Link 12161831 Disease Relevance 0 Pain Relevance 0

General Comments

This test has worked.

Personal tools
Namespaces

Variants
Actions
Navigation
Toolbox