INT10911

From wiki-pain
Jump to: navigation, search
Context Info
Confidence 0.24
First Reported 1992
Last Reported 2006
Negated 3
Speculated 1
Reported most in Abstract
Documents 6
Total Number 8
Disease Relevance 0.56
Pain Relevance 1.32

This is a graph with borders and nodes. Maybe there is an Imagemap used so the nodes may be linking to some Pages.

peptidase activity (Nln) mitochondrion (Nln) cytoplasm (Nln)
Anatomy Link Frequency
blood 2
tube 1
proximal 1
Nln (Rattus norvegicus)
Pain Link Frequency Relevance Heat
Spinal cord 3 98.36 Very High Very High Very High
anesthesia 19 94.64 High High
Sciatic nerve 1 75.76 Quite High
Sciatica 1 53.96 Quite High
Disease Link Frequency Relevance Heat
Nerve Root Compression 3 91.84 High High
Spinal Cord Diseases 3 90.28 High High
Paralysis 2 72.80 Quite High

Sentences Mentioned In

Key: Protein Mutation Event Anatomy Negation Speculation Pain term Disease term
Unfortunately, MEP responses are affected by most common anesthetics.
Regulation (affected) of MEP
1) Confidence 0.24 Published 1995 Journal Neurosurgery Section Abstract Doc Link 8559347 Disease Relevance 0 Pain Relevance 0.05
Unfortunately, MEP responses are affected by most common anesthetics.
Regulation (responses) of MEP
2) Confidence 0.24 Published 1995 Journal Neurosurgery Section Abstract Doc Link 8559347 Disease Relevance 0 Pain Relevance 0.05
Stimulation of different points produced little change on the waveforms of the MEP or PFEP.
Neg (little) Regulation (change) of MEP
3) Confidence 0.20 Published 1996 Journal Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol Section Abstract Doc Link 9020827 Disease Relevance 0 Pain Relevance 0.39
The analysis of amplitude, duration, and number of phases of MEP following transcranial stimulation increases the diagnostic value of MEP in disorders of the spine affecting the central or proximal peripheral motor pathways.
Regulation (value) of MEP in proximal
4) Confidence 0.13 Published 1992 Journal Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol Section Abstract Doc Link 1526212 Disease Relevance 0.42 Pain Relevance 0.05
CONCLUSION: MEP to the transcranial electrical stimulation under a constant and clinically appropriate blood propofol concentration are not affected by surgical noxious stimuli.


Neg (not) Regulation (affected) of MEP in blood
5) Confidence 0.06 Published 2003 Journal Can J Anaesth Section Body Doc Link 12514158 Disease Relevance 0 Pain Relevance 0
PURPOSE: To investigate whether motor evoked potentials (MEP) to transcranial electrical stimulation under constant blood propofol concentration are affected by the arousing effect of surgical noxious stimuli.
Spec (whether) Regulation (affected) of MEP in blood
6) Confidence 0.06 Published 2003 Journal Can J Anaesth Section Abstract Doc Link 12514158 Disease Relevance 0 Pain Relevance 0.15
Baseline values for MEP were similar, but MEP was always higher for the N2O groups (P < 0.001).
Regulation (values) of MEP
7) Confidence 0.06 Published 2006 Journal Anesth. Analg. Section Abstract Doc Link 16368850 Disease Relevance 0.07 Pain Relevance 0.31
We conclude that the choice of airway device does not influence MEP among orally inserted tracheal tube, classic laryngeal mask airway, ProSeal laryngeal mask airway, and laryngeal tube suction during anesthesia with or without N2O in the gas mixture.
Neg (not) Regulation (influence) of MEP in tube associated with anesthesia
8) Confidence 0.06 Published 2006 Journal Anesth. Analg. Section Abstract Doc Link 16368850 Disease Relevance 0.07 Pain Relevance 0.32

General Comments

This test has worked.

Personal tools
Namespaces

Variants
Actions
Navigation
Toolbox