INT147264

From wiki-pain
Jump to: navigation, search
Context Info
Confidence 0.29
First Reported 2008
Last Reported 2008
Negated 0
Speculated 0
Reported most in Body
Documents 2
Total Number 4
Disease Relevance 0.60
Pain Relevance 0

This is a graph with borders and nodes. Maybe there is an Imagemap used so the nodes may be linking to some Pages.

CSR (Rattus norvegicus)
Pain Link Frequency Relevance Heat
Sciatica 4 50.00 Quite Low
imagery 1 50.00 Quite Low
anesthesia 9 5.00 Very Low Very Low Very Low
epidural 9 5.00 Very Low Very Low Very Low
Disease Link Frequency Relevance Heat
Meconium Aspiration Syndrome 33 99.46 Very High Very High Very High
Respiratory Distress 30 99.30 Very High Very High Very High
Syndrome 6 73.12 Quite High
Nerve Root Compression 1 50.00 Quite Low
Congenital Anomalies 24 5.00 Very Low Very Low Very Low
Birth Weight 18 5.00 Very Low Very Low Very Low
Hypertension 15 5.00 Very Low Very Low Very Low
Diabetes Mellitus 15 5.00 Very Low Very Low Very Low
Fetal Distress 9 5.00 Very Low Very Low Very Low
Placenta Previa 6 5.00 Very Low Very Low Very Low

Sentences Mentioned In

Key: Protein Mutation Event Anatomy Negation Speculation Pain term Disease term
Regarding the "Apgar 4–6" scores we no longer found a significant difference between "average" CSR group and "high" CSR group, whereas the difference between "average CSR" and "low CSR" groups remained significant.
Gene_expression (group) of CSR
1) Confidence 0.29 Published 2008 Journal BMC Health Serv Res Section Body Doc Link PMC2266728 Disease Relevance 0.07 Pain Relevance 0
Regarding RDS and MAS, we observed in the three CSR groups almost identical incidences after a vaginal delivery.
Gene_expression (groups) of CSR associated with meconium aspiration syndrome and respiratory distress
2) Confidence 0.29 Published 2008 Journal BMC Health Serv Res Section Body Doc Link PMC2266728 Disease Relevance 0.45 Pain Relevance 0
Regarding the "Apgar 4–6" scores we no longer found a significant difference between "average" CSR group and "high" CSR group, whereas the difference between "average CSR" and "low CSR" groups remained significant.
Gene_expression (group) of CSR
3) Confidence 0.29 Published 2008 Journal BMC Health Serv Res Section Body Doc Link PMC2266728 Disease Relevance 0.07 Pain Relevance 0
RESULTS: Combined utilization of minimal F latency, F chronodispersion, F persistence and side to side differences resulted in 55% sensitivity and 100% side concordance for detecting CSR, with MRI as a comparison standard.
Gene_expression (detecting) of CSR
4) Confidence 0.26 Published 2008 Journal Clin Neurol Neurosurg Section Body Doc Link 17949894 Disease Relevance 0 Pain Relevance 0

General Comments

This test has worked.

Personal tools
Namespaces

Variants
Actions
Navigation
Toolbox