INT150384

From wiki-pain
Jump to: navigation, search
Context Info
Confidence 0.25
First Reported 2005
Last Reported 2011
Negated 0
Speculated 2
Reported most in Body
Documents 10
Total Number 14
Disease Relevance 3.10
Pain Relevance 2.05

This is a graph with borders and nodes. Maybe there is an Imagemap used so the nodes may be linking to some Pages.

Anatomy Link Frequency
facet 1
RCT (Mus musculus)
Pain Link Frequency Relevance Heat
complementary and alternative medicine 369 100.00 Very High Very High Very High
imagery 168 99.98 Very High Very High Very High
Pain 75 96.68 Very High Very High Very High
backache 68 80.64 Quite High
alcohol 6 76.96 Quite High
Osteoarthritis 24 75.60 Quite High
vagus nerve 4 61.32 Quite High
Acute pain 4 22.72 Low Low
Analgesic 2 10.00 Low Low
Acupuncture 39 5.00 Very Low Very Low Very Low
Disease Link Frequency Relevance Heat
Disease 26 100.00 Very High Very High Very High
Pain 82 96.68 Very High Very High Very High
Overweight 3 92.80 High High
Leukocytosis 1 91.28 High High
Staphylococcus Infection 74 89.48 High High
Reprotox - General 1 2 89.32 High High
Cognitive Disorder 22 88.00 High High
Pneumonia 50 87.68 High High
Stroke 93 86.40 High High
Low Back Pain 68 80.64 Quite High

Sentences Mentioned In

Key: Protein Mutation Event Anatomy Negation Speculation Pain term Disease term
Construction work, characterized by heavy lifting, pushing and pulling, the RCT aims at improving physical capacity and promoting musculoskeletal and cardiovascular health.
RCT Binding (pulling) of
1) Confidence 0.25 Published 2010 Journal BMC Public Health Section Abstract Doc Link PMC2841104 Disease Relevance 0.24 Pain Relevance 0
CONCLUSIONS: RCT frequently mimics the clinical features of RPA and recognizing the key symptoms and signs of RCT versus RPA can be challenging but important in avoiding unnecessary interventions.
RCT Binding (recognizing) of
2) Confidence 0.23 Published 2010 Journal Semin. Arthritis Rheum. Section Body Doc Link 19540570 Disease Relevance 0.13 Pain Relevance 0
CONCLUSION: RCT combined with RHT is an efficient salvage therapy showing high efficacy with acceptable toxicity and can be recommended as treatment option for this unfavorable group of preirradiated patients with local recurrence of rectal cancer.


RCT Binding (recommended) of
3) Confidence 0.19 Published 2008 Journal Strahlenther Onkol Section Body Doc Link 18330513 Disease Relevance 0 Pain Relevance 0
At least, the duration of the RCT differs widely (3 months to 3 years), within and between treatments, making the interpretation sometime more difficult.
RCT Binding (duration) of
4) Confidence 0.19 Published 2008 Journal BMC Musculoskelet Disord Section Body Doc Link PMC2627841 Disease Relevance 0.50 Pain Relevance 0.40
The evidence collated in the foregoing discussion favours a research paradigm that recognizes the structural limits of the RCT in the context of evaluating nonbiomedical therapeutic systems.
RCT Binding (recognizes) of
5) Confidence 0.18 Published 2011 Journal Evidence-based Complementary and Alternative Medicine : eCAM Section Body Doc Link PMC2952302 Disease Relevance 0 Pain Relevance 0.17
Thus, in considering the RCT as a research tool, the amenability of CAM therapies (especially those that profess to heal the emotional facet of disease) to the RCT needs to be factored into the choice of a research methodology.

4.

RCT Binding (amenability) of in facet associated with complementary and alternative medicine and disease
6) Confidence 0.14 Published 2011 Journal Evidence-based Complementary and Alternative Medicine : eCAM Section Body Doc Link PMC2952302 Disease Relevance 0.10 Pain Relevance 0.16
Some arguments have highlighted the structural incompatibility between the RCT, which was designed for biomedical research, and CAM, which primarily comprises therapeutic philosophies that transcend the biomedical.
RCT Binding (incompatibility) of associated with complementary and alternative medicine
7) Confidence 0.14 Published 2011 Journal Evidence-based Complementary and Alternative Medicine : eCAM Section Body Doc Link PMC2952302 Disease Relevance 0 Pain Relevance 0.27
Furthermore, the practical ease of posting written educational material to individual practitioners, in contrast to more 'active' interventions, should lend itself to a non-cluster RCT.
RCT Binding (lend) of
8) Confidence 0.08 Published 2005 Journal BMC Musculoskelet Disord Section Body Doc Link PMC1208895 Disease Relevance 0.30 Pain Relevance 0.22
Women could only enter the RCT if they met the criteria of the cohort study and the following inclusion criteria: employment for a minimum of 12 hours a week until six months after the delivery and working for the same employer before and after maternity leave.
RCT Binding (enter) of
9) Confidence 0.07 Published 2007 Journal BMC Public Health Section Body Doc Link PMC1851952 Disease Relevance 0.09 Pain Relevance 0
Treatment groups for the RCT
RCT Binding (groups) of
10) Confidence 0.07 Published 2007 Journal BMC Public Health Section Body Doc Link PMC1851952 Disease Relevance 0 Pain Relevance 0
Patient's expectations towards the MI intervention in the RCT.

- After MI intervention: ?

RCT Binding (intervention) of associated with imagery
11) Confidence 0.07 Published 2009 Journal Trials Section Body Doc Link PMC2775030 Disease Relevance 0.08 Pain Relevance 0.74
Feedback given during the structured interview highlighted particular areas of concern that might influence a patient's decision to volunteer for a future RCT.
RCT Spec (might) Binding (volunteer) of
12) Confidence 0.05 Published 2007 Journal Trials Section Body Doc Link PMC1797057 Disease Relevance 0.36 Pain Relevance 0.04
Following this pilot study, the majority of investigators were willing to recruit for the future RCT.
RCT Binding (recruit) of
13) Confidence 0.05 Published 2007 Journal Trials Section Body Doc Link PMC1797057 Disease Relevance 0.47 Pain Relevance 0
Subjects who had either a normal or abnormal RCT finding were statistically compared as to gender, age, and length of stay in the acute care setting.
RCT Spec (finding) Binding (finding) of
14) Confidence 0.02 Published 2005 Journal Cough Section Body Doc Link PMC1277006 Disease Relevance 0.83 Pain Relevance 0.03

General Comments

This test has worked.

Personal tools
Namespaces

Variants
Actions
Navigation
Toolbox