INT155130

From wiki-pain
Jump to: navigation, search
Context Info
Confidence 0.58
First Reported 2006
Last Reported 2010
Negated 1
Speculated 0
Reported most in Body
Documents 14
Total Number 14
Disease Relevance 3.43
Pain Relevance 1.61

This is a graph with borders and nodes. Maybe there is an Imagemap used so the nodes may be linking to some Pages.

molecular_function (IMPACT) cellular_component (IMPACT) biological_process (IMPACT)
Anatomy Link Frequency
stigma 1
joints 1
knee joint 1
IMPACT (Homo sapiens)
Pain Link Frequency Relevance Heat
Arthritis 131 98.88 Very High Very High Very High
palliative 18 97.52 Very High Very High Very High
Infliximab 84 96.24 Very High Very High Very High
depression 33 95.56 Very High Very High Very High
visual analogue scale 4 86.88 High High
Pain 42 81.92 Quite High
methotrexate 13 67.28 Quite High
Leflunomide 2 66.88 Quite High
psoriasis 29 63.40 Quite High
rheumatoid arthritis 31 38.68 Quite Low
Disease Link Frequency Relevance Heat
Age-related Macular Degeneration 5 100.00 Very High Very High Very High
Seronegative Spondarthritis 104 98.88 Very High Very High Very High
Depression 33 95.56 Very High Very High Very High
Cognitive Disorder 25 95.04 Very High Very High Very High
Disease 156 90.04 High High
Pain 49 81.92 Quite High
Latent Tuberculosis 1 78.64 Quite High
Cancer 17 75.00 Quite High
Psoriasis 37 74.84 Quite High
Anxiety Disorder 31 72.60 Quite High

Sentences Mentioned In

Key: Protein Mutation Event Anatomy Negation Speculation Pain term Disease term
They also indicated that due to impact of stigma, some clients were neglected and abandoned.
Gene_expression (neglected) of impact in stigma
1) Confidence 0.58 Published 2010 Journal Indian Journal of Palliative Care Section Body Doc Link PMC2936080 Disease Relevance 0.32 Pain Relevance 0.16
In this case the use of three response points could be labelled: no impact/distress, moderate impact/distress and extreme impact/distress.
Gene_expression (distress) of impact
2) Confidence 0.41 Published 2006 Journal Health Qual Life Outcomes Section Body Doc Link PMC1526715 Disease Relevance 0.16 Pain Relevance 0
Correlation coefficients were also calculated between the corresponding PIPP Impact and PIPP Distress subscales to explore the relationship between respondents' perceptions of the impact of their disability, and the level of distress that this causes (see Table 7).
Gene_expression (perceptions) of impact
3) Confidence 0.41 Published 2006 Journal Health Qual Life Outcomes Section Body Doc Link PMC1526715 Disease Relevance 0.10 Pain Relevance 0.03
This suggests that while relationships are comparatively more resistant to the impact of mobility impairment then other domains, when a health condition does actually impact upon relationships, it results in considerable distress.
Gene_expression (resistant) of impact
4) Confidence 0.41 Published 2006 Journal Health Qual Life Outcomes Section Body Doc Link PMC1526715 Disease Relevance 0 Pain Relevance 0
These were then subjected to further statistical analyses to assess the relationship among the PIPP subscales, between the impact and distress subscales, and between the subscales and the various components of the EQ5D, which were included in the questionnaire booklet.
Gene_expression (subscales) of impact
5) Confidence 0.41 Published 2006 Journal Health Qual Life Outcomes Section Body Doc Link PMC1526715 Disease Relevance 0 Pain Relevance 0
This suggests that while relationships are comparatively more resistant to the impact of mobility impairment then other domains, when a health condition does actually impact upon relationships, it results in considerable distress.
Gene_expression (resistant) of impact
6) Confidence 0.41 Published 2006 Journal Health Qual Life Outcomes Section Body Doc Link PMC1526715 Disease Relevance 0 Pain Relevance 0
Development of the Perceived Impact of Problem Profile (PIPP)
Gene_expression (Development) of Impact
7) Confidence 0.41 Published 2006 Journal Health Qual Life Outcomes Section Body Doc Link PMC1526715 Disease Relevance 0 Pain Relevance 0
In this case the use of three response points could be labelled: no impact/distress, moderate impact/distress and extreme impact/distress.
Gene_expression (distress) of impact
8) Confidence 0.41 Published 2006 Journal Health Qual Life Outcomes Section Body Doc Link PMC1526715 Disease Relevance 0.17 Pain Relevance 0
For example, two patients with similar health problems (eg. restricted movement in the knee joint) may experience very different levels of impact and distress.
Gene_expression (levels) of impact in knee joint
9) Confidence 0.37 Published 2006 Journal Health Qual Life Outcomes Section Body Doc Link PMC1526715 Disease Relevance 0.07 Pain Relevance 0
Respondent 1, a professional footballer, may experience highly elevated levels of impact and distress concerning his condition, requiring immediate treatment.
Gene_expression (levels) of impact
10) Confidence 0.37 Published 2006 Journal Health Qual Life Outcomes Section Body Doc Link PMC1526715 Disease Relevance 0.06 Pain Relevance 0
Results indicated that the impact of age-related macular degeneration was not well reflected in the EQ-5D or SF-6D with mean utility values of 0.72 (standard deviation = 0.22) and 0.66 (standard deviation = 0.14) respectively.
Neg (not) Gene_expression (reflected) of impact associated with age-related macular degeneration
11) Confidence 0.27 Published 2010 Journal Health Qual Life Outcomes Section Body Doc Link PMC2844366 Disease Relevance 0.67 Pain Relevance 0
The IMPACT trial included 104 patients with PsA who were seronegative for rheumatoid factor, had at least five tender and five swollen joints, and were refractory to therapy with ?
Gene_expression (trial) of IMPACT in joints associated with arthritis
12) Confidence 0.23 Published 2006 Journal Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management Section Body Doc Link PMC1936360 Disease Relevance 0.99 Pain Relevance 0.87
In order to analyse the relative burden of impacts among dimensions, three intuitive descriptors of the causes of impacts were used: "impact value", i.e., number of impacts generating a given causal entity, regardless of the dimensions they were recorded in; "impact extension", i.e., the number of dimensions affected by a given causal entity; and "impact prominence", i.e., the percentage of impacts attributable to a given causal entity in a given dimension.


Gene_expression (recorded) of impact prominence
13) Confidence 0.04 Published 2008 Journal Health Qual Life Outcomes Section Body Doc Link PMC2631008 Disease Relevance 0 Pain Relevance 0.04
Strong associations were also found between PSQI and IES-R (Impact of Event Scale-Revised) (P = 0.004).
Gene_expression (found) of Impact of Event Scale-Revised
14) Confidence 0.03 Published 2009 Journal Palliat Med Section Abstract Doc Link 18838488 Disease Relevance 0.88 Pain Relevance 0.52

General Comments

This test has worked.

Personal tools
Namespaces

Variants
Actions
Navigation
Toolbox