INT162177

From wiki-pain
Jump to: navigation, search
Context Info
Confidence 0.32
First Reported 2003
Last Reported 2010
Negated 0
Speculated 0
Reported most in Body
Documents 12
Total Number 12
Disease Relevance 3.34
Pain Relevance 0.27

This is a graph with borders and nodes. Maybe there is an Imagemap used so the nodes may be linking to some Pages.

EBM (Homo sapiens)
Pain Link Frequency Relevance Heat
Lasting pain 1 84.24 Quite High
Pain 5 75.32 Quite High
tolerance 1 70.72 Quite High
biopsychosocial 1 30.08 Quite Low
addiction 14 5.00 Very Low Very Low Very Low
alcohol 6 5.00 Very Low Very Low Very Low
corticosteroid 4 5.00 Very Low Very Low Very Low
palliative 4 5.00 Very Low Very Low Very Low
Pain scale 4 5.00 Very Low Very Low Very Low
Neuritis 2 5.00 Very Low Very Low Very Low
Disease Link Frequency Relevance Heat
Clinical Trials And Case Reports 178 100.00 Very High Very High Very High
Pain 9 84.24 Quite High
Low Back Pain 1 75.00 Quite High
Disease 41 73.68 Quite High
Stress 7 72.56 Quite High
Glaucoma 9 72.16 Quite High
Age-related Macular Degeneration 10 67.20 Quite High
Dry Eye 1 64.00 Quite High
Confusion 10 54.36 Quite High
Ocular Hypertension 5 50.00 Quite Low

Sentences Mentioned In

Key: Protein Mutation Event Anatomy Negation Speculation Pain term Disease term
What is the relationship between EBM and its alternatives, as seen from the perspective of the Quinean metaphor of the web of belief?
EBM Binding (relationship) of
1) Confidence 0.32 Published 2003 Journal BMC Health Serv Res Section Body Doc Link PMC169187 Disease Relevance 0.07 Pain Relevance 0
Application to EBM and the alternatives
EBM Binding (Application) of
2) Confidence 0.32 Published 2003 Journal BMC Health Serv Res Section Body Doc Link PMC169187 Disease Relevance 0.07 Pain Relevance 0
EBM and the basic sciences offer different paths through the web to claims about intervention safety and efficacy: each begins with a very different set of observation statements as its evidential checkpoint; however, neither is completely self-standing and independent.
EBM Binding (checkpoint) of
3) Confidence 0.32 Published 2003 Journal BMC Health Serv Res Section Body Doc Link PMC169187 Disease Relevance 0 Pain Relevance 0
In other words, they respond to the second order conceptual question ("what is EBM?")
EBM Binding (respond) of
4) Confidence 0.32 Published 2003 Journal BMC Health Serv Res Section Body Doc Link PMC169187 Disease Relevance 0 Pain Relevance 0
Thus, integration of the EBM within the curriculum is important so as not to isolate it as a separate discipline.
EBM Binding (integration) of associated with clinical trials and case reports
5) Confidence 0.32 Published 2009 Journal Medical Education Online Section Body Doc Link PMC2779624 Disease Relevance 0.81 Pain Relevance 0
Adoption of the University of Sydney's curriculum also posed an educational dilemma for us as the University of Sydney's curriculum already had EBM integrated, but it was felt to be insufficient.
EBM Binding (integrated) of associated with clinical trials and case reports
6) Confidence 0.32 Published 2009 Journal Medical Education Online Section Body Doc Link PMC2779624 Disease Relevance 0.94 Pain Relevance 0
In addition, EBM supports the movement toward patient participation in decision making.2


EBM Binding (participation) of associated with clinical trials and case reports
7) Confidence 0.32 Published 2009 Journal Medical Education Online Section Body Doc Link PMC2779624 Disease Relevance 0.84 Pain Relevance 0
A few students reported their attendance at courses such as EBM, semiology, skills lab or CPR, which have no relation with communication skills training.
EBM Binding (attendance) of
8) Confidence 0.32 Published 2005 Journal BMC Med Educ Section Body Doc Link PMC549546 Disease Relevance 0 Pain Relevance 0
EBM is in turn based on 4 basic contingencies: the recognition of the patient's problem and the construction of a structured clinical question; the ability to efficiently and effectively search the medical literature to retrieve the best available evidence to answer the clinical question; clinical appraisal of the evidence; and integration of the evidence with all aspects of the individual patient's decision-making to determine the best clinical care of the patient.
EBM Binding (recognition) of
9) Confidence 0.31 Published 2009 Journal Pain Physician Section Abstract Doc Link 19668280 Disease Relevance 0.29 Pain Relevance 0.27
The emerging appreciation of EBM is also recognized within the ophthalmic literature (Sharma 2001; Straatsma 2003) as well as by the International Council of Ophthalmology (2007).
EBM Binding (recognized) of
10) Confidence 0.28 Published 2008 Journal Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) Section Body Doc Link PMC2693990 Disease Relevance 0.20 Pain Relevance 0
EBM and NBM should collaborate
EBM Binding (collaborate) of
11) Confidence 0.27 Published 2010 Journal Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare Section Body Doc Link PMC3004608 Disease Relevance 0.11 Pain Relevance 0
There is growing recognition of EBM in Italy and independent educational initiatives to improve general practice are becoming more common.
EBM Binding (recognition) of
12) Confidence 0.07 Published 2008 Journal Implement Sci Section Body Doc Link PMC2494552 Disease Relevance 0 Pain Relevance 0

General Comments

This test has worked.

Personal tools
Namespaces

Variants
Actions
Navigation
Toolbox