INT162726

From wiki-pain
Jump to: navigation, search
Context Info
Confidence 0.58
First Reported 2004
Last Reported 2010
Negated 0
Speculated 0
Reported most in Body
Documents 12
Total Number 12
Disease Relevance 4.53
Pain Relevance 1.66

This is a graph with borders and nodes. Maybe there is an Imagemap used so the nodes may be linking to some Pages.

Anatomy Link Frequency
corpus 1
spinal nerve 1
liver 1
LTPA 1
RCT (Mus musculus)
Pain Link Frequency Relevance Heat
Arthritis 9 100.00 Very High Very High Very High
Opioid 23 97.84 Very High Very High Very High
imagery 161 96.36 Very High Very High Very High
agonist 42 96.08 Very High Very High Very High
rheumatoid arthritis 30 94.16 High High
backache 4 81.28 Quite High
cINOD 9 80.72 Quite High
Inflammation 21 78.36 Quite High
Pain 23 75.00 Quite High
sSRI 1 73.64 Quite High
Disease Link Frequency Relevance Heat
Rheumatoid Arthritis 35 100.00 Very High Very High Very High
Disorder Of Lipid Metabolism 588 99.88 Very High Very High Very High
Movement Disorders 1 98.88 Very High Very High Very High
Disease 102 98.54 Very High Very High Very High
Atherosclerosis 105 98.44 Very High Very High Very High
Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome Or Hiv Infection 7 94.84 High High
Hepatitis 3 93.16 High High
Hepatitis C Virus Infection 4 92.68 High High
Hepatitis B Virus Infection 2 91.72 High High
Coronary Heart Disease 103 87.16 High High

Sentences Mentioned In

Key: Protein Mutation Event Anatomy Negation Speculation Pain term Disease term
All potential participants were invited to answer a screening questionnaire on age, sex, height, weight, working hours, job seniority, leisure time physical activity (LTPA), diseases and musculoskeletal disorders as well as a request for their consent to participate in the RCT.
Localization (participate) of RCT in LTPA associated with disease
1) Confidence 0.58 Published 2010 Journal BMC Med Res Methodol Section Body Doc Link PMC2895606 Disease Relevance 0.10 Pain Relevance 0
For each respective RCT, the participants were recruited from managers' lists of employees, which included their civil registration number with linked information about age and sex.
Localization (recruited) of RCT
2) Confidence 0.49 Published 2010 Journal BMC Public Health Section Body Doc Link PMC2841104 Disease Relevance 0.20 Pain Relevance 0.12
To ensure that the results of a large RCT would be clinically relevant (i.e., not outdated with respect to clinical management) at least one subject should be recruited weekly from each centre (1250 subjects/25 sites/50 subjects per site per year?
Localization (relevant) of RCT
3) Confidence 0.39 Published 2009 Journal PLoS ONE Section Body Doc Link PMC2645707 Disease Relevance 0.06 Pain Relevance 0.06
We perform a series of analyses on a corpus of randomly selected collection of RCT abstracts to answer the following questions:
Localization (collection) of RCT in corpus
4) Confidence 0.33 Published 2008 Journal BMC Med Inform Decis Mak Section Body Doc Link PMC2584633 Disease Relevance 0 Pain Relevance 0
There is a relative dearth of information on this issue, although one RCT (Tight Control of Rheumatoid Arthritis, C Grigor and colleagues) presented at The British Society for Rheumatology meeting, 2003, and not yet published suggests that adding DMARDs sequentially to obtain tight control of RA is practical and effective.
Localization (presented) of RCT associated with rheumatoid arthritis and arthritis
5) Confidence 0.20 Published 2004 Journal Arthritis Res Ther Section Body Doc Link PMC400421 Disease Relevance 0.56 Pain Relevance 0.43
An important question not answered by an RCT is that of clinical applicability: Are the effect sizes observed in an RCT reduplicated in an open clinical study?
Localization (reduplicated) of RCT
6) Confidence 0.20 Published 2006 Journal BMC Med Res Methodol Section Body Doc Link PMC1540434 Disease Relevance 0.23 Pain Relevance 0.15
By transporting excess cholesterol from peripheral cells to the liver for excretion in a process known as reverse cholesterol transport (RCT), HDL-C may retard the progression of atherosclerosis.
Localization (excretion) of RCT in liver associated with atherosclerosis and disorder of lipid metabolism
7) Confidence 0.16 Published 2008 Journal Vascular Health and Risk Management Section Body Doc Link PMC2464766 Disease Relevance 1.65 Pain Relevance 0.06
The inclusion and exclusion criteria of the RCT (please see Table2) describe main characteristics of the patients.
Localization (please) of RCT
8) Confidence 0.16 Published 2009 Journal Trials Section Body Doc Link PMC2775030 Disease Relevance 0.05 Pain Relevance 0.34
One such synthetic agent, GW3965, was found to increase the rate of RCT in vivo without inducing hepatic steatosis.
Localization (rate) of RCT
9) Confidence 0.16 Published 2010 Journal Vascular Health and Risk Management Section Body Doc Link PMC2988622 Disease Relevance 0.66 Pain Relevance 0.25
Participants are recruited into the RCT from specialist outpatient movement disorder clinics and private neurologists and physical therapists in the Melbourne metropolitan area as well as from advertising in local newspapers.
Localization (recruited) of RCT associated with movement disorders
10) Confidence 0.15 Published 2008 Journal BMC Geriatr Section Body Doc Link PMC2573876 Disease Relevance 0.25 Pain Relevance 0
STUDY DESIGN: Randomized control trial (RCT) for L2 spinal nerve infiltration (L2 block) in clinical cases.
Localization (infiltration) of RCT in spinal nerve
11) Confidence 0.12 Published 2009 Journal Spine Section Abstract Doc Link 19730208 Disease Relevance 0.15 Pain Relevance 0.15
RCT, randomised controlled trial
Localization (trial) of RCT
12) Confidence 0.05 Published 2008 Journal BMC Public Health Section Body Doc Link PMC2253538 Disease Relevance 0.63 Pain Relevance 0.10

General Comments

This test has worked.

Personal tools
Namespaces

Variants
Actions
Navigation
Toolbox