INT164916

From wiki-pain
Jump to: navigation, search
Context Info
Confidence 0.33
First Reported 2006
Last Reported 2010
Negated 0
Speculated 0
Reported most in Body
Documents 9
Total Number 9
Disease Relevance 1.84
Pain Relevance 0.66

This is a graph with borders and nodes. Maybe there is an Imagemap used so the nodes may be linking to some Pages.

signal transduction (IL1RL1) extracellular space (IL1RL1) extracellular region (IL1RL1)
plasma membrane (IL1RL1) intracellular (IL1RL1)
Anatomy Link Frequency
tongue 1
fingers 1
inferior 1
IL1RL1 (Homo sapiens)
Pain Link Frequency Relevance Heat
cytokine 4 99.06 Very High Very High Very High
Inflammation 25 96.64 Very High Very High Very High
depression 14 96.20 Very High Very High Very High
Chronic pancreatitis 1 88.08 High High
Substantia nigra 1 82.56 Quite High
Pain 5 76.32 Quite High
insula 3 75.24 Quite High
Inflammatory response 2 67.20 Quite High
anesthesia 4 56.80 Quite High
lidocaine 2 55.88 Quite High
Disease Link Frequency Relevance Heat
Asthma 17 97.64 Very High Very High Very High
Rhinitis 62 97.16 Very High Very High Very High
INFLAMMATION 27 96.64 Very High Very High Very High
Depression 14 96.20 Very High Very High Very High
Fibrosis 1 95.04 Very High Very High Very High
Anaphylaxis 1 93.28 High High
Eczema 31 92.40 High High
Obesity 16 89.68 High High
Vision Disorders 1 88.76 High High
Hallucination 6 84.56 Quite High

Sentences Mentioned In

Key: Protein Mutation Event Anatomy Negation Speculation Pain term Disease term
OBJECTIVE: Interleukin 33 (IL33) is a cytokine belonging to the IL1 family and it binds to a complex of the ST2L/IL1 receptor accessory protein (IL1RAcP).
ST2L Binding (binds) of associated with cytokine
1) Confidence 0.33 Published 2010 Journal Gut Section Abstract Doc Link 19996325 Disease Relevance 0.10 Pain Relevance 0.18
Thus, the IL33-IL1RL1 interaction is likely a key contributor to both innate and acquired mechanisms of eosinophilic inflammation in aCRSwNP.
IL33-IL1RL1 Binding (interaction) of associated with rhinitis and inflammation
2) Confidence 0.33 Published 2010 Journal PLoS ONE Section Body Doc Link PMC2897889 Disease Relevance 0.89 Pain Relevance 0.08
The recorded strengths of T1 and T4 were expressed as fractions of T1 before the administration of vecuronium.
T1 Binding (fractions) of
3) Confidence 0.19 Published 2007 Journal Theor Biol Med Model Section Body Doc Link PMC1939837 Disease Relevance 0.10 Pain Relevance 0.21
Peak areas for each individual resonance were corrected with its corresponding T1 and T2.
T1 Binding (corresponding) of
4) Confidence 0.13 Published 2008 Journal Journal of Lipid Research Section Body Doc Link PMC2515528 Disease Relevance 0.15 Pain Relevance 0
More specifically, the monkeys rarely chose T2 when more juice was offered at T1 than at T2 (i.e., those trials when the T1?
T1 Binding (trials) of
5) Confidence 0.02 Published 2009 Journal PLoS ONE Section Body Doc Link PMC2771902 Disease Relevance 0 Pain Relevance 0
After another additional 300 msec, the central LED was turned off, and the monkey shifted its gaze to either T1 or T2 to be rewarded.
T1 Binding (gaze) of
6) Confidence 0.02 Published 2009 Journal PLoS ONE Section Body Doc Link PMC2771902 Disease Relevance 0 Pain Relevance 0
"Measuring tactile stimulus fusion, Brecher (in 1932: [3]) found that the critical frequency did not depend on intensity of stimulation or the cutaneous receptor density: Stimulation of the tips of tongue and fingers gave approximately the same critical frequency value as stimulation of the back or the feet.
stimulation Binding (intensity) of in fingers
7) Confidence 0.02 Published 2006 Journal BMC Neurosci Section Body Doc Link PMC1483834 Disease Relevance 0 Pain Relevance 0
Laughter with a sensation of mirth was associated with stimulation of the left inferior temporal region in the vicinity of the parahippocampal gyrus.


stimulation Binding (associated) of in inferior
8) Confidence 0.01 Published 2010 Journal Frontiers in Human Neuroscience Section Body Doc Link PMC2889679 Disease Relevance 0.61 Pain Relevance 0.19
"Measuring tactile stimulus fusion, Brecher (in 1932: [3]) found that the critical frequency did not depend on intensity of stimulation or the cutaneous receptor density: Stimulation of the tips of tongue and fingers gave approximately the same critical frequency value as stimulation of the back or the feet.
stimulation Binding (intensity) of in tongue
9) Confidence 0.01 Published 2006 Journal BMC Neurosci Section Body Doc Link PMC1483834 Disease Relevance 0 Pain Relevance 0

General Comments

This test has worked.

Personal tools
Namespaces

Variants
Actions
Navigation
Toolbox