INT169035

From wiki-pain
Jump to: navigation, search
Context Info
Confidence 0.19
First Reported 2007
Last Reported 2010
Negated 0
Speculated 0
Reported most in Body
Documents 3
Total Number 3
Disease Relevance 0.20
Pain Relevance 0

This is a graph with borders and nodes. Maybe there is an Imagemap used so the nodes may be linking to some Pages.

mitochondrion (Nlrx1) molecular_function (Nlrx1) biological_process (Nlrx1)
Anatomy Link Frequency
uterine 1
heart 1
Nlrx1 (Mus musculus)
Pain Link Frequency Relevance Heat
Angina 28 50.00 Quite Low
chemokine 2 34.72 Quite Low
cytokine 22 34.24 Quite Low
imagery 10 5.00 Very Low Very Low Very Low
Inflammation 9 5.00 Very Low Very Low Very Low
metalloproteinase 5 5.00 Very Low Very Low Very Low
fibrosis 3 5.00 Very Low Very Low Very Low
ischemia 3 5.00 Very Low Very Low Very Low
Inflammatory response 2 5.00 Very Low Very Low Very Low
antagonist 2 5.00 Very Low Very Low Very Low
Disease Link Frequency Relevance Heat
Sarcoma 3 80.12 Quite High
Shock 2 64.08 Quite High
Injury 11 59.96 Quite High
Myocardial Infarction 30 50.00 Quite Low
Cv General 3 Under Development 19 50.00 Quite Low
Pathologic Constriction 8 26.56 Quite Low
Death 3 20.44 Low Low
Emergencies 12 5.00 Very Low Very Low Very Low
Cv Unclassified Under Development 12 5.00 Very Low Very Low Very Low
INFLAMMATION 11 5.00 Very Low Very Low Very Low

Sentences Mentioned In

Key: Protein Mutation Event Anatomy Negation Speculation Pain term Disease term
RESULTS: The receiver operating characteristic curve showed the best cut-off values of the NLR (>or=2.12) and serum CA-125 levels (>or=27.5U/ml) for the preoperative diagnosis of uterine sarcomas, demonstrating that the NLR was more powerful for the preoperative diagnosis of uterine sarcomas than serum CA-125 levels (sensitivity, 74.5% vs. 52.3%; specificity, 70.3% vs. 50.5%; positive predictive value, 29.5% vs. 15.1%; negative predictive value, 94.3% vs. 86.5%; accuracy, 60.6% vs. 49.6%; p<0.05).
Gene_expression (levels) of NLR in uterine
1) Confidence 0.19 Published 2010 Journal Eur J Surg Oncol Section Body Doc Link 20570475 Disease Relevance 0.08 Pain Relevance 0
Very little is currently known about the expression and function of NLR, CLR, and RLR in the heart, and thus this review will summarize some of the budding knowledge of TLR below.
Gene_expression (expression) of NLR in heart
2) Confidence 0.02 Published 2010 Journal Heart Fail Rev Section Body Doc Link PMC3003782 Disease Relevance 0.12 Pain Relevance 0
Summary estimates for sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR) and the overall diagnostic performance expressed in the diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) were calculated.
Gene_expression (expressed) of NLR
3) Confidence 0.01 Published 2007 Journal BMC Cardiovasc Disord Section Body Doc Link PMC2228319 Disease Relevance 0 Pain Relevance 0

General Comments

This test has worked.

Personal tools
Namespaces

Variants
Actions
Navigation
Toolbox