INT178787

From wiki-pain
Jump to: navigation, search
Context Info
Confidence 0.59
First Reported 2004
Last Reported 2010
Negated 0
Speculated 0
Reported most in Body
Documents 39
Total Number 41
Disease Relevance 17.55
Pain Relevance 9.23

This is a graph with borders and nodes. Maybe there is an Imagemap used so the nodes may be linking to some Pages.

cytoskeletal protein binding (arm) cell morphogenesis (arm) cell adhesion (arm)
nucleus (arm) cytoplasm (arm)
Anatomy Mention Frequency
arm 13
shoulder 5
upper arm 3
neck 3
lower arm 2
arm (Drosophila melanogaster)
Pain Term Frequency Confidence Heat
anesthesia 7 100.00 Very High Very High Very High
cINOD 27 99.48 Very High Very High Very High
local anesthetic 15 99.24 Very High Very High Very High
Pain 819 98.90 Very High Very High Very High
aspirin 21 98.44 Very High Very High Very High
Paracetamol 4 97.34 Very High Very High Very High
agonist 38 94.80 High High
Shooting pain 32 94.72 High High
visual analogue scale 4 93.68 High High
burning pain 32 93.56 High High
Disease Term Frequency Confidence Heat
Cancer 140 99.60 Very High Very High Very High
INFLAMMATION 68 98.92 Very High Very High Very High
Pain 859 98.90 Very High Very High Very High
Hypesthesia 176 96.80 Very High Very High Very High
Colon Cancer 22 96.40 Very High Very High Very High
Brachial Plexus Neuritis 110 95.20 Very High Very High Very High
Toothache 48 93.80 High High
Meningioma 6 91.16 High High
Intestinal Cancer 1 89.68 High High
Dysesthesia 13 88.08 High High

Sentences Mentioned In

Key: Protein Mutation Event Anatomy Negation Speculation Pain term Disease term
The similarities between EM and ARM conditioned responses could be due to the fact that ARM is already formed 1.5?
Gene_expression (responses) of ARM
1) Confidence 0.59 Published 2010 Journal Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience Section Body Doc Link PMC3020398 Disease Relevance 0 Pain Relevance 0
Long-term memory (LTM), formed after spaced trials, requires de novo protein-synthesis, in contrast to anesthesia-resistant memory (ARM), which is formed after single or massed trials (Tully et al., 1994).
Gene_expression (synthesis) of ARM associated with anesthesia
2) Confidence 0.59 Published 2010 Journal Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience Section Body Doc Link PMC3020398 Disease Relevance 0.20 Pain Relevance 0.10
ARM formed after massed conditioning was measured 24?
Gene_expression (formed) of ARM
3) Confidence 0.59 Published 2010 Journal Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience Section Body Doc Link PMC3020398 Disease Relevance 0.28 Pain Relevance 0
In addition, the arm doesn't need to be abducted as in an axillary brachial plexus block [1,2].
Gene_expression (abducted) of arm in axillary
4) Confidence 0.58 Published 2010 Journal Korean Journal of Anesthesiology Section Body Doc Link PMC2872833 Disease Relevance 0.38 Pain Relevance 0.35
experimental arm: total dose 0.6 Gy in single fractions of 0.1 Gy applied twice a week (acting as a placebo)
Gene_expression (experimental) of arm in arm
5) Confidence 0.09 Published 2008 Journal Radiat Oncol Section Abstract Doc Link PMC2557002 Disease Relevance 0.62 Pain Relevance 0.23
Arm A: Total dose of 6 Gy in 6 single fractions of 1 Gy applied twice weekly (standard arm)
Gene_expression (applied) of arm in arm
6) Confidence 0.09 Published 2008 Journal Radiat Oncol Section Body Doc Link PMC2557002 Disease Relevance 0.68 Pain Relevance 0.20
The system is shown graphically in five figures:

• Entry into system (Figure 1) • Overview of the high quality arm (Figure 2) • Homogeneous data (Figure 3) • Heterogeneous data (Figure 4) • Small evidence base (Figure 5)

Gene_expression (data) of arm in arm
7) Confidence 0.08 Published 2006 Journal BMC Med Res Methodol Section Body Doc Link PMC1624842 Disease Relevance 0.05 Pain Relevance 0
Possible regions included: neck, shoulder, upper arm, elbow, lower arm, and hand/wrist.
Gene_expression (neck) of arm in upper arm
8) Confidence 0.07 Published 2010 Journal J Occup Rehabil Section Body Doc Link PMC2980628 Disease Relevance 0.52 Pain Relevance 0.33
= 0.83), (10) bilateral arm (NOT neck and shoulder) stiffness (? 
Gene_expression (stiffness) of arm in arm
9) Confidence 0.07 Published 2010 Journal J Occup Rehabil Section Body Doc Link PMC2980628 Disease Relevance 0.77 Pain Relevance 0.52
Possible regions included: neck, shoulder, upper arm, elbow, lower arm, and hand/wrist.
Gene_expression (neck) of arm in upper arm
10) Confidence 0.07 Published 2010 Journal J Occup Rehabil Section Body Doc Link PMC2980628 Disease Relevance 0.52 Pain Relevance 0.33
= 0.86), (9) chronic bilateral (dorsal and ventral) upper arm symptoms (? 
Gene_expression (symptoms) of arm in upper arm
11) Confidence 0.07 Published 2010 Journal J Occup Rehabil Section Body Doc Link PMC2980628 Disease Relevance 0.77 Pain Relevance 0.50
= 0.83), (10) bilateral arm (NOT neck and shoulder) stiffness (? 
Gene_expression (neck) of arm in neck
12) Confidence 0.07 Published 2010 Journal J Occup Rehabil Section Body Doc Link PMC2980628 Disease Relevance 0.77 Pain Relevance 0.51
Median nerve movement in the arm in response to contralateral neck side flexion (CNSF) with or without shoulder protraction
Gene_expression (movement) of arm in arm
13) Confidence 0.06 Published 2004 Journal BMC Musculoskelet Disord Section Body Doc Link PMC503391 Disease Relevance 0.06 Pain Relevance 0
This was done to examine the effect of these variables on shoulder and arm functioning and whether including these variables as a between-subjects factor would produce different results from the procedures including groups according to SLNB, SLNB + CLND, or ALND.
Gene_expression (functioning) of arm in shoulder
14) Confidence 0.05 Published 2010 Journal Ann Surg Oncol Section Body Doc Link PMC2924495 Disease Relevance 0.48 Pain Relevance 0
The DASH questionnaire measures the whole arm and shoulder, and therefore has slightly different questions.
Gene_expression (measures) of arm in shoulder
15) Confidence 0.05 Published 2008 Journal BMC Musculoskelet Disord Section Body Doc Link PMC2435532 Disease Relevance 0.20 Pain Relevance 0.20
In order to avoid any obscuring arm shadow in the LA view, the arms were positioned in such a way that the hands were able to hold a supporting bar (Fig. 3b).Figure 3Arm positions in AP (a) and LA (b) view while standing in conventional method
Gene_expression (shadow) of arm in arm
16) Confidence 0.05 Published 2010 Journal Ann Biomed Eng Section Body Doc Link PMC2940050 Disease Relevance 0 Pain Relevance 0
The arm position in the LA view was the clavicular arm position with elbows flexed at 45° and fists resting on the ipsilateral clavicles as described by Faro et al.9 (Fig. 2b).Figure 2Arm positions in AP (a) and LA (b) view while standing on the BalancAid
Gene_expression (position) of arm in arm
17) Confidence 0.05 Published 2010 Journal Ann Biomed Eng Section Body Doc Link PMC2940050 Disease Relevance 0.12 Pain Relevance 0.06
An investigation on a single arm position for the AP/PA and LA views without changing the position may be needed to avoid ambiguity with the reproducibility.



Gene_expression (position) of arm in arm
18) Confidence 0.05 Published 2010 Journal Ann Biomed Eng Section Body Doc Link PMC2940050 Disease Relevance 0 Pain Relevance 0
The arm position in the LA view was the clavicular arm position with elbows flexed at 45° and fists resting on the ipsilateral clavicles as described by Faro et al.9 (Fig. 2b).Figure 2Arm positions in AP (a) and LA (b) view while standing on the BalancAid
Gene_expression (position) of arm in arm
19) Confidence 0.05 Published 2010 Journal Ann Biomed Eng Section Body Doc Link PMC2940050 Disease Relevance 0.12 Pain Relevance 0.06
This arm position is chosen for the reason that it has the closest sagittal vertical axis to the functional standing posture.
Gene_expression (position) of arm in arm
20) Confidence 0.05 Published 2010 Journal Ann Biomed Eng Section Body Doc Link PMC2940050 Disease Relevance 0.13 Pain Relevance 0

General Comments

This test has worked.

Personal tools
Namespaces

Variants
Actions
Navigation
Toolbox