INT183714

From wiki-pain
Jump to: navigation, search
Context Info
Confidence 0.60
First Reported 2005
Last Reported 2009
Negated 0
Speculated 1
Reported most in Body
Documents 17
Total Number 18
Disease Relevance 1.59
Pain Relevance 0.19

This is a graph with borders and nodes. Maybe there is an Imagemap used so the nodes may be linking to some Pages.

methyltransferase activity (EMG1) nucleolus (EMG1) RNA binding (EMG1)
rRNA binding (EMG1) nucleus (EMG1) cytoplasm (EMG1)
Anatomy Link Frequency
muscles 3
head 3
TRP 1
knee 1
EMG1 (Homo sapiens)
Pain Link Frequency Relevance Heat
Biofeedback 16 98.96 Very High Very High Very High
antagonist 2 71.52 Quite High
backache 8 58.32 Quite High
Pain 31 33.36 Quite Low
Spinal cord 14 6.88 Low Low
Action potential 465 5.00 Very Low Very Low Very Low
Patellofemoral syndrome 14 5.00 Very Low Very Low Very Low
addiction 8 5.00 Very Low Very Low Very Low
agonist 4 5.00 Very Low Very Low Very Low
headache 4 5.00 Very Low Very Low Very Low
Disease Link Frequency Relevance Heat
Movement Disorders 8 95.96 Very High Very High Very High
Intellectual Impairment 40 94.16 High High
Injury 78 89.16 High High
Peripheral Arterial Disease 4 88.16 High High
Fatigue 89 75.52 Quite High
Obesity 2 70.40 Quite High
Knee Injuries 2 58.48 Quite High
Low Back Pain 8 58.32 Quite High
Neuromuscular Disease 24 57.72 Quite High
Sprains And Strains 36 50.00 Quite Low

Sentences Mentioned In

Key: Protein Mutation Event Anatomy Negation Speculation Pain term Disease term
Thus, head rotation produces an asymmetric EMG response.
Gene_expression (produces) of EMG in head
1) Confidence 0.60 Published 2005 Journal J Neuroengineering Rehabil Section Body Doc Link PMC1156933 Disease Relevance 0 Pain Relevance 0
The sternocleidomastoid muscles in this case still showed an asymmetric EMG response, with the right sternocleidomastoid (the one responsible for head rotation to the left) generating a higher percentage (22%) of its maximal voluntary contraction electromyogram than the left sternocleidomastoid (4%) (p < 0.05).
Gene_expression (response) of EMG in head
2) Confidence 0.52 Published 2005 Journal J Neuroengineering Rehabil Section Body Doc Link PMC1156933 Disease Relevance 0 Pain Relevance 0
Though they generated less EMG activity, the sternocleidomastoids muscles also tended to show an asymmetric EMG response, with the left sternocleidomastoid (the one responsible for head rotation to the right) generating a higher percentage (26%) of its maximal voluntary contraction electromyogram than the right sternocleidomastoid (4%) (p < 0.05).
Gene_expression (response) of EMG in head
3) Confidence 0.52 Published 2005 Journal J Neuroengineering Rehabil Section Body Doc Link PMC1156933 Disease Relevance 0 Pain Relevance 0
The normalized EMG for the sternocleidomastoid (SCM), splenius capitis (SPL) and trapezius (TRP) muscles are shown in Fig. 3.
Gene_expression (shown) of EMG in TRP
4) Confidence 0.52 Published 2005 Journal J Neuroengineering Rehabil Section Body Doc Link PMC1156933 Disease Relevance 0 Pain Relevance 0
The results showed that the VLO presents a significantly different behavior compared with the VLL, whereas the VLO showed a similar motor unit recruitment to the VMO, producing higher EMG activity in MVIC knee extension at 90° of flexion compared with MVIC hip abduction at 0° and 30° of abduction.
Gene_expression (producing) of EMG in knee
5) Confidence 0.39 Published 2006 Journal J Neuroengineering Rehabil Section Body Doc Link PMC1562433 Disease Relevance 0.06 Pain Relevance 0
Bevilaqua-Grossi et al. [27] investigated the EMG activity of the VMO, VLL and VLO muscles in 21 healthy subjects performing open kinetic chain knee extension at 15° and 90° of flexion.
Spec (investigated) Gene_expression (activity) of EMG in muscles
6) Confidence 0.39 Published 2006 Journal J Neuroengineering Rehabil Section Body Doc Link PMC1562433 Disease Relevance 0 Pain Relevance 0.04
This kind of classification is set so that EMG signal analysis algorithms can be optimized and equipments can be designed in a consistent manner.
Gene_expression (optimized) of EMG
7) Confidence 0.14 Published 2006 Journal Biol Proced Online Section Body Doc Link PMC1455479 Disease Relevance 0 Pain Relevance 0
Biomedical signals such as EMG signals are not always strictly repeatable and may sometimes even be contradictory.
Gene_expression (signals) of EMG
8) Confidence 0.14 Published 2006 Journal Biol Proced Online Section Body Doc Link PMC1455479 Disease Relevance 0 Pain Relevance 0
It is not based on voice signals but EMG.
Gene_expression (based) of EMG
9) Confidence 0.14 Published 2006 Journal Biol Proced Online Section Body Doc Link PMC1455479 Disease Relevance 0 Pain Relevance 0
Techniques for EMG signal detection, decomposition, process and classification were discussed along with their advantages and disadvantages.
Gene_expression (detection) of EMG
10) Confidence 0.14 Published 2006 Journal Biol Proced Online Section Body Doc Link PMC1455479 Disease Relevance 0.34 Pain Relevance 0
Electrical noise and factors affecting EMG signal


Gene_expression (signal) of EMG
11) Confidence 0.14 Published 2006 Journal Biol Proced Online Section Body Doc Link PMC1455479 Disease Relevance 0.10 Pain Relevance 0.04
The EMG controller does not occupy the user’s hands, and does not require them to operate it; hence it is “hands free” (74).
Gene_expression (controller) of EMG
12) Confidence 0.14 Published 2006 Journal Biol Proced Online Section Body Doc Link PMC1455479 Disease Relevance 0.12 Pain Relevance 0.06
Recent advances in technologies of signal processing and mathematical models have made it practical to develop advanced EMG detection and analysis techniques.
Gene_expression (detection) of EMG
13) Confidence 0.14 Published 2006 Journal Biol Proced Online Section Body Doc Link PMC1455479 Disease Relevance 0.26 Pain Relevance 0
EMG is also used in many types of research laboratories, including those involved in biomechanics, motor control, neuromuscular physiology, movement disorders, postural control, and physical therapy.


Gene_expression (used) of EMG associated with movement disorders
14) Confidence 0.14 Published 2006 Journal Biol Proced Online Section Body Doc Link PMC1455479 Disease Relevance 0.10 Pain Relevance 0.05
EMG processing
Gene_expression (processing) of EMG
15) Confidence 0.13 Published 2006 Journal Chiropr Osteopat Section Body Doc Link PMC1397849 Disease Relevance 0 Pain Relevance 0
This variability appears normal and limits the use of EMG in producing data which can identify individuals with dysfunction [3,4].
Gene_expression (producing) of EMG
16) Confidence 0.13 Published 2006 Journal Chiropr Osteopat Section Body Doc Link PMC1397849 Disease Relevance 0.45 Pain Relevance 0
Regarding EMG we expected that in the synchronous condition the muscle activity would be shown to be greater in the last 12?
Gene_expression (Regarding) of EMG in muscle
17) Confidence 0.10 Published 2008 Journal Frontiers in Human Neuroscience Section Body Doc Link PMC2572198 Disease Relevance 0 Pain Relevance 0
The monkey sat calmly throughout this process and made no hand or arm movements, as evidenced by the complete absence of EMG activity in all recorded muscles during the period of action observation (?
Gene_expression (activity) of EMG in muscles
18) Confidence 0.04 Published 2009 Journal Neuron Section Body Doc Link PMC2862290 Disease Relevance 0.17 Pain Relevance 0

General Comments

This test has worked.

Personal tools
Namespaces

Variants
Actions
Navigation
Toolbox