INT187061

From wiki-pain
Jump to: navigation, search
Context Info
Confidence 0.19
First Reported 2005
Last Reported 2010
Negated 0
Speculated 0
Reported most in Body
Documents 7
Total Number 7
Disease Relevance 1.81
Pain Relevance 0.49

This is a graph with borders and nodes. Maybe there is an Imagemap used so the nodes may be linking to some Pages.

extracellular region (Pip) biological_process (Pip)
Anatomy Link Frequency
joints 3
fingers 2
Pip (Mus musculus)
Pain Link Frequency Relevance Heat
rheumatoid arthritis 183 91.96 High High
anesthesia 1 73.76 Quite High
cytokine 10 54.08 Quite High
Inflammation 46 53.72 Quite High
Arthritis 84 50.00 Quite Low
Pain 23 32.04 Quite Low
cva 6 5.00 Very Low Very Low Very Low
visual analogue scale 4 5.00 Very Low Very Low Very Low
Inflammatory mediators 3 5.00 Very Low Very Low Very Low
methotrexate 2 5.00 Very Low Very Low Very Low
Disease Link Frequency Relevance Heat
Lung Injury 110 95.60 Very High Very High Very High
Rheumatoid Arthritis 183 91.96 High High
Synovitis 20 87.36 High High
Tendinitis And Tenosynovitis 10 86.92 High High
Adult Respiratory Distress Syndrome 40 82.76 Quite High
Pneumonia 6 82.44 Quite High
Disease 96 81.72 Quite High
Barotrauma 6 56.36 Quite High
INFLAMMATION 46 53.72 Quite High
Urological Neuroanatomy 9 51.76 Quite High

Sentences Mentioned In

Key: Protein Mutation Event Anatomy Negation Speculation Pain term Disease term
PIP and VT were measured and monitored using a linear pneumotach (series 8430; Hans Rudolph, Inc., Shawnee, KS, USA) and research pneumotach system (model RSS 100 HR; Hans Rudolph, Inc.).
Gene_expression (measured) of PIP
1) Confidence 0.19 Published 2008 Journal Crit Care Section Body Doc Link PMC2575597 Disease Relevance 0.46 Pain Relevance 0.13
P is set by either setting a PIP (VIP Bird ventilator) or pressure above PEEP (Servo 900C or 300 ventilator).
Gene_expression (setting) of PIP
2) Confidence 0.16 Published 2010 Journal Saudi Journal of Anaesthesia Section Body Doc Link PMC2945520 Disease Relevance 0.30 Pain Relevance 0
Concerning the PIP joints, the highest erosion scores were present in the third and fourth PIP joints.
Gene_expression (joints) of PIP in joints
3) Confidence 0.14 Published 2005 Journal Arthritis Res Ther Section Body Doc Link PMC1257421 Disease Relevance 0.39 Pain Relevance 0.20
Concerning the PIP joints, the highest erosion scores were present in the third and fourth PIP joints.
Gene_expression (joints) of PIP in joints
4) Confidence 0.14 Published 2005 Journal Arthritis Res Ther Section Body Doc Link PMC1257421 Disease Relevance 0.34 Pain Relevance 0.17
In the healthy controls, either MCP joint 2 to 4 and PIP joint 2 and 3 (n = 3), MCP joint 3 to 5 and PIP joint 4 and 5 (n = 3), or MCP joint 2 to 4 and the wrist joint (n = 3) were scanned.
Gene_expression (joint) of PIP in joint
5) Confidence 0.03 Published 2010 Journal Arthritis Res Ther Section Body Doc Link PMC2911885 Disease Relevance 0.31 Pain Relevance 0
For the fingers, the average slopes of the MCP-PIP regressions for movements made inside and outside of the device were 1.31 ± 0.24 and 1.17 ± 0.14, respectively and the mean PIP-DIP regression slopes were 0.21 ± 0.1 for movements within HEXORR and 0.15 ± 0.12 for movements outside of the device.
Gene_expression (regressions) of PIP in fingers
6) Confidence 0.03 Published 2010 Journal J Neuroeng Rehabil Section Body Doc Link PMC2920290 Disease Relevance 0 Pain Relevance 0
For the fingers, the average slopes of the MCP-PIP regressions for movements made inside and outside of the device were 1.31 ± 0.24 and 1.17 ± 0.14, respectively and the mean PIP-DIP regression slopes were 0.21 ± 0.1 for movements within HEXORR and 0.15 ± 0.12 for movements outside of the device.
Gene_expression (regressions) of PIP in fingers
7) Confidence 0.03 Published 2010 Journal J Neuroeng Rehabil Section Body Doc Link PMC2920290 Disease Relevance 0 Pain Relevance 0

General Comments

This test has worked.

Personal tools
Namespaces

Variants
Actions
Navigation
Toolbox