INT192192

Context Info Confidence 0.53 First Reported 2006 Last Reported 2010 Negated 0 Speculated 0 Reported most in Body Documents 5 Total Number 7 Disease Relevance 0.72 Pain Relevance 0.19

cytosol (FBXW11) nucleus (FBXW11) cell cycle (FBXW11) cytoplasm (FBXW11)

Anatomy Link Frequency HOS 4 FBXW11 (Homo sapiens)

Pain Link Frequency Relevance Heat addiction 4 94.32 Action potential 232 80.00 Biofeedback 8 5.00 Inflammation 6 5.00 Spinal cord 4 5.00 backache 4 5.00 cytokine 3 5.00 ischemia 3 5.00 lidocaine 3 5.00

Disease Link Frequency Relevance Heat Stress 18 87.68 Pulmonary Disease 27 68.56 Toxicity 3 66.96 Fatigue 44 5.00 Intellectual Impairment 20 5.00 Injury 15 5.00 Asthma 15 5.00 Adult Respiratory Distress Syndrome 15 5.00 Neuromuscular Disease 12 5.00 Bronchiolitis Obliterans 9 5.00

Sentences Mentioned In

Key:

Protein

Mutation

Event

Anatomy

Negation

Speculation

Pain term

Disease term

HOS have been introduced in the 1960s and applied in the 1970s.

Gene_expression (introduced) of HOS in HOS

1) Confidence 0.53 Published 2006 Journal Biol Proced Online Section Body Doc Link PMC1455479 Disease Relevance 0 Pain Relevance 0.04

Another feature of HOS is that the HOS spectrum of the sum of two or more statistically independent random processes equal the sum of their individual HOS spectra, therefore, HOS can extract information due to derivation from Gaussianity and it provides suitable measurement of the extent of statistical dependence in time series.

Gene_expression (spectra) of HOS in HOS associated with addiction

2) Confidence 0.46 Published 2006 Journal Biol Proced Online Section Body Doc Link PMC1455479 Disease Relevance 0 Pain Relevance 0.11

HOS have been introduced in the 1960s and applied in the 1970s.

Gene_expression (applied) of HOS in HOS

3) Confidence 0.46 Published 2006 Journal Biol Proced Online Section Body Doc Link PMC1455479 Disease Relevance 0 Pain Relevance 0.04

In 2004, Shahjahan Shahid (1) applied HOS for EMG signal analysis and characterization due to its advantages of HOS over SOS.

Gene_expression (advantages) of HOS in HOS

4) Confidence 0.46 Published 2006 Journal Biol Proced Online Section Body Doc Link PMC1455479 Disease Relevance 0 Pain Relevance 0

While unexposed SM samples expressed same levels of HOs, expression level of HO-1 was upregulated about 3.58 ± 1.93 folds in SM exposed patients in comparison with unexposed ones, we could not find any difference in expression of HO-2 n two groups.

Gene_expression (expressed) of HOs

5) Confidence 0.07 Published 2010 Journal Gene Regul Syst Bio Section Abstract Doc Link PMC2956478 Disease Relevance 0.36 Pain Relevance 0

While unexposed SM samples expressed same levels of HOs, expression level of HO-1 was upregulated about 3.58 ± 1.93 folds in SM exposed patients in comparison with unexposed ones, we could not find any difference in expression of HO-2 n two groups.

Gene_expression (expression) of HOs

6) Confidence 0.06 Published 2010 Journal Gene Regul Syst Bio Section Abstract Doc Link PMC2956478 Disease Relevance 0.36 Pain Relevance 0

Data were revealed as mean ± SD of fold-changes of HOs gene expression in three independent experiments.

Gene_expression (expression) of HOs

7) Confidence 0.06 Published 2010 Journal Gene Regul Syst Bio Section Body Doc Link PMC2956478 Disease Relevance 0 Pain Relevance 0

General Comments

This test has worked.