INT194986

From wiki-pain
Jump to: navigation, search
Context Info
Confidence 0.33
First Reported 2006
Last Reported 2010
Negated 0
Speculated 2
Reported most in Body
Documents 4
Total Number 6
Disease Relevance 0.63
Pain Relevance 0.18

This is a graph with borders and nodes. Maybe there is an Imagemap used so the nodes may be linking to some Pages.

molecular_function (IMPACT) cellular_component (IMPACT) biological_process (IMPACT)
Anatomy Link Frequency
knee joint 1
IMPACT (Homo sapiens)
Pain Link Frequency Relevance Heat
depression 18 89.96 High High
Pain 7 75.60 Quite High
biopsychosocial 20 64.24 Quite High
addiction 2 52.48 Quite High
Multiple sclerosis 10 5.00 Very Low Very Low Very Low
Arthritis 10 5.00 Very Low Very Low Very Low
Central nervous system 5 5.00 Very Low Very Low Very Low
Spinal cord 5 5.00 Very Low Very Low Very Low
Lasting pain 5 5.00 Very Low Very Low Very Low
backache 5 5.00 Very Low Very Low Very Low
Disease Link Frequency Relevance Heat
Disease 40 99.98 Very High Very High Very High
Depression 18 89.96 High High
Anxiety Disorder 24 89.52 High High
Confusion 4 78.52 Quite High
Cognitive Disorder 11 42.04 Quite Low
Pulmonary Disease 35 21.16 Low Low
Shock 5 11.40 Low Low
Stress 13 5.00 Very Low Very Low Very Low
Demyelinating Disease 10 5.00 Very Low Very Low Very Low
Arthritis 10 5.00 Very Low Very Low Very Low

Sentences Mentioned In

Key: Protein Mutation Event Anatomy Negation Speculation Pain term Disease term
To sum up, the burden of disease-induced relational impact for caregivers appeared to reside in the questioning/shift/loss of relational and personal identity, self-concept, and caregiving motivation.
Positive_regulation (induced) of impact associated with disease
1) Confidence 0.33 Published 2010 Journal International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Section Body Doc Link PMC2898087 Disease Relevance 0.24 Pain Relevance 0.10
One of the major strengths of the PIPP is that it measures both impact and distress in regard to a variety of domains, providing valuable information on the individual's experience of their health condition.
Positive_regulation (measures) of impact
2) Confidence 0.31 Published 2006 Journal Health Qual Life Outcomes Section Body Doc Link PMC1526715 Disease Relevance 0 Pain Relevance 0
For example, two patients with similar health problems (eg. restricted movement in the knee joint) may experience very different levels of impact and distress.
Spec (may) Positive_regulation (experience) of impact in knee joint
3) Confidence 0.31 Published 2006 Journal Health Qual Life Outcomes Section Body Doc Link PMC1526715 Disease Relevance 0.07 Pain Relevance 0
Respondent 1, a professional footballer, may experience highly elevated levels of impact and distress concerning his condition, requiring immediate treatment.
Spec (may) Positive_regulation (experience) of impact
4) Confidence 0.31 Published 2006 Journal Health Qual Life Outcomes Section Body Doc Link PMC1526715 Disease Relevance 0.07 Pain Relevance 0
While this study was conducted on a relatively small Australian sample, it forms part of a larger cross-cultural study that explores the impact and distress related to mobility in different countries, including Thailand, Malaysia, Myanmar, and Laos.
Positive_regulation (explores) of impact
5) Confidence 0.31 Published 2006 Journal Health Qual Life Outcomes Section Body Doc Link PMC1526715 Disease Relevance 0.08 Pain Relevance 0.03
Similarly, those who had more difficulty in regard to self-care, mobility, and participation as measured by EQ5D, were more likely to also report higher impact and distress in the equivalent PIPP subscales.
Positive_regulation (report) of impact
6) Confidence 0.31 Published 2006 Journal Health Qual Life Outcomes Section Body Doc Link PMC1526715 Disease Relevance 0.18 Pain Relevance 0.04

General Comments

This test has worked.

Personal tools
Namespaces

Variants
Actions
Navigation
Toolbox