From wiki-pain
Jump to: navigation, search
Context Info
Confidence 0.65
First Reported 2006
Last Reported 2010
Negated 0
Speculated 0
Reported most in Body
Documents 5
Total Number 5
Disease Relevance 1.42
Pain Relevance 1.01

This is a graph with borders and nodes. Maybe there is an Imagemap used so the nodes may be linking to some Pages.

peptidase activity (C2) extracellular region (C2)
Anatomy Link Frequency
whiskers 1
nociceptors 1
C2 (Mus musculus)
Pain Link Frequency Relevance Heat
Antinociceptive 30 99.98 Very High Very High Very High
Pain 10 99.40 Very High Very High Very High
nociceptor 1 97.56 Very High Very High Very High
qutenza 15 96.88 Very High Very High Very High
nMDA receptor 132 88.48 High High
imagery 17 85.96 High High
lumbar region 1 85.80 High High
agonist 13 81.84 Quite High
antagonist 26 80.88 Quite High
Neuropeptide 2 72.64 Quite High
Disease Link Frequency Relevance Heat
Dislocations 6 100.00 Very High Very High Very High
Pain 8 99.40 Very High Very High Very High
Shock 14 98.24 Very High Very High Very High
Stress 6 97.68 Very High Very High Very High
Scoliosis 8 95.76 Very High Very High Very High
Injury 5 85.44 High High
Targeted Disruption 34 80.72 Quite High
Congenital Anomalies 9 71.96 Quite High
Nociception 11 62.00 Quite High
Marfan Syndrome 6 57.24 Quite High

Sentences Mentioned In

Key: Protein Mutation Event Anatomy Negation Speculation Pain term Disease term
In order to evaluate the antinociceptive response of compounds C1 and C2 in neurogenic pain caused by direct chemical stimulation on nociceptors, the capsaicin test was evaluated.
Localization (response) of C2 in nociceptors associated with pain, qutenza, nociceptor and antinociceptive
1) Confidence 0.65 Published 2010 Journal BMC Pharmacol Section Body Doc Link PMC2817697 Disease Relevance 0.32 Pain Relevance 0.69
Quantifying the spatial extent of the intrinsic optical signal, the location of the peak response from C1, C2, and C3 whiskers can be easily distinguished, separated by 243??
Localization (response) of C2 in whiskers
2) Confidence 0.37 Published 2007 Journal Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience Section Body Doc Link PMC2526007 Disease Relevance 0 Pain Relevance 0.11
cassette) and GluN1X00 (GluN1-4: C2?
Localization (cassette) of C2
3) Confidence 0.11 Published 2010 Journal Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience Section Body Doc Link PMC2874396 Disease Relevance 0 Pain Relevance 0.13
Based on the present study, we suggest that the mechanism of the rotatory dislocation of C1-C2 is due to the existence of two adverse factors.
Localization (dislocation) of C2 associated with dislocations
4) Confidence 0.07 Published 2006 Journal Scoliosis Section Body Doc Link PMC1624850 Disease Relevance 0.70 Pain Relevance 0.10
To monitor GSK3 expression in c2.1 relative to A6, protein extracts of both cell lines were harvested at 0, 4, 12, 24, 30 and 36 hours following the serum shock (Fig. 5C) in parallel with the serum shocked A6 and c2.1 RNA samples.
Localization (relative) of c2 associated with shock
5) Confidence 0.07 Published 2007 Journal J Circadian Rhythms Section Body Doc Link PMC1803776 Disease Relevance 0.41 Pain Relevance 0

General Comments

This test has worked.

Personal tools