INT205627

From wiki-pain
Jump to: navigation, search
Context Info
Confidence 0.56
First Reported 2007
Last Reported 2009
Negated 1
Speculated 0
Reported most in Body
Documents 5
Total Number 8
Disease Relevance 1.29
Pain Relevance 1.24

This is a graph with borders and nodes. Maybe there is an Imagemap used so the nodes may be linking to some Pages.

nucleus (GCM1) DNA binding (GCM1) transcription factor binding (GCM1)
Anatomy Link Frequency
eye 1
arm 1
GCM1 (Homo sapiens)
Pain Link Frequency Relevance Heat
Transcranial magnetic stimulation 728 96.20 Very High Very High Very High
depression 134 92.64 High High
analgesia 1 85.72 High High
Lasting pain 4 53.72 Quite High
behavioral therapy 2 19.36 Low Low
imagery 23 5.00 Very Low Very Low Very Low
antidepressant 12 5.00 Very Low Very Low Very Low
Neurobehavioral 8 5.00 Very Low Very Low Very Low
Migraine 4 5.00 Very Low Very Low Very Low
magnetoencephalography 4 5.00 Very Low Very Low Very Low
Disease Link Frequency Relevance Heat
Depression 148 92.64 High High
Infection 4 89.64 High High
Diabetes Mellitus 34 86.24 High High
Asthma 34 85.72 High High
Mental Disorders 18 85.68 High High
Chronic Disease 6 82.20 Quite High
Targeted Disruption 1 75.28 Quite High
Pain 4 53.72 Quite High
Hypertension 2 47.60 Quite Low
Cognitive Disorder 24 5.00 Very Low Very Low Very Low

Sentences Mentioned In

Key: Protein Mutation Event Anatomy Negation Speculation Pain term Disease term
In this small pilot study, we did not see relative benefits for the GCM arm for the primary clinical outcomes.
Gene_expression (arm) of GCM in arm
1) Confidence 0.56 Published 2007 Journal BMC Fam Pract Section Body Doc Link PMC1838423 Disease Relevance 0.72 Pain Relevance 0.12
The GCM proportion of patients using minimal/moderate adequate dose for at least 75% of each time period was greater for 10/12 individual variables (Table 3).
Gene_expression (proportion) of GCM
2) Confidence 0.56 Published 2007 Journal BMC Fam Pract Section Body Doc Link PMC1838423 Disease Relevance 0.40 Pain Relevance 0.20
In spite of its successful application, GCM requires the direct observation of the state variables and does not include designed experimental effects in the model which form some of its limitations.
Gene_expression (requires) of GCM
3) Confidence 0.41 Published 2009 Journal PLoS Computational Biology Section Body Doc Link PMC2777405 Disease Relevance 0.09 Pain Relevance 0.09
To determine the precise locus of TMS stimulation, we decreased activation or connectivity map thresholds until only the most strongly task-specific voxels (for PPC) or the voxels most strongly effectively connected to PPC (highest GCM values, for MFG) remained.
Gene_expression (values) of GCM associated with transcranial magnetic stimulation
4) Confidence 0.11 Published 2009 Journal PLoS ONE Section Body Doc Link PMC2789405 Disease Relevance 0 Pain Relevance 0.09
These effects overlapped spatially with GCM functional connectivity analysis referenced to the stimulated PPC.
Gene_expression (analysis) of GCM
5) Confidence 0.11 Published 2009 Journal PLoS ONE Section Body Doc Link PMC2789405 Disease Relevance 0 Pain Relevance 0.38
PPC component, would explain our GCM data and the high correlation data from Sack et al. [21].
Gene_expression (data) of GCM
6) Confidence 0.11 Published 2009 Journal PLoS ONE Section Body Doc Link PMC2789405 Disease Relevance 0 Pain Relevance 0.20
It has been shown previously that with the current fMRI EC analysis (GCM) and fMRI parameters (TR?
Gene_expression (analysis) of GCM
7) Confidence 0.11 Published 2009 Journal PLoS ONE Section Body Doc Link PMC2789405 Disease Relevance 0 Pain Relevance 0.17
The cultured oral cells do not express cytokeratin K12 or the eye-specific transcription factor, Pax-6.
Neg (not) Gene_expression (express) of eye-specific transcription factor in eye
8) Confidence 0.06 Published 2008 Journal Molecular Vision Section Body Doc Link PMC2254962 Disease Relevance 0.08 Pain Relevance 0

General Comments

This test has worked.

Personal tools
Namespaces

Variants
Actions
Navigation
Toolbox