INT218445

From wiki-pain
Jump to: navigation, search
Context Info
Confidence 0.75
First Reported 2008
Last Reported 2010
Negated 1
Speculated 0
Reported most in Body
Documents 3
Total Number 5
Disease Relevance 2.21
Pain Relevance 0.45

This is a graph with borders and nodes. Maybe there is an Imagemap used so the nodes may be linking to some Pages.

cell differentiation (Smarcb1) nuclear chromosome (Smarcb1) nucleolus (Smarcb1)
nucleus (Smarcb1) cell cycle (Smarcb1)
Smarcb1 (Mus musculus)
Pain Link Frequency Relevance Heat
isoflurane 3 80.08 Quite High
anesthesia 4 79.44 Quite High
imagery 30 76.60 Quite High
Inflammation 46 70.72 Quite High
cytokine 15 69.68 Quite High
ischemia 15 50.00 Quite Low
chemokine 1 39.52 Quite Low
Inflammatory response 8 5.00 Very Low Very Low Very Low
rheumatoid arthritis 6 5.00 Very Low Very Low Very Low
Inflammatory mediators 2 5.00 Very Low Very Low Very Low
Disease Link Frequency Relevance Heat
Cancer 234 99.54 Very High Very High Very High
Salivary Gland Disease 22 99.08 Very High Very High Very High
Apoptosis 45 94.56 High High
Pressure And Volume Under Development 6 81.52 Quite High
Hepatocellular Cancer 18 73.92 Quite High
INFLAMMATION 55 70.72 Quite High
Targeted Disruption 20 67.36 Quite High
Liver Cancer 12 60.80 Quite High
Reperfusion Injury 10 50.00 Quite Low
Adhesions 12 49.12 Quite Low

Sentences Mentioned In

Key: Protein Mutation Event Anatomy Negation Speculation Pain term Disease term
Expression of Bcl-2 in I/Ri-rats was also increased in comparison to sham-operated rats, indicative of the initiation of the tissue homeostatic response.
Gene_expression (Expression) of in I
1) Confidence 0.75 Published 2010 Journal BMC Gastroenterol Section Body Doc Link PMC2873601 Disease Relevance 0.88 Pain Relevance 0.14
Finally, variability in IxAC expression by individual adult females was observed: individual adult females each expressed different individual or series (up to three) of IxACs although some variants such IxAC-B1 were expressed more often than others.


Gene_expression (expression) of in I
2) Confidence 0.58 Published 2008 Journal PLoS ONE Section Body Doc Link PMC2151134 Disease Relevance 0.17 Pain Relevance 0
C-MYC induction preceded integrase expression because the integrase protein can only be detected by Western blot for up to one day after hydrodynamic injection [39].
Gene_expression (detected) of integrase protein
3) Confidence 0.11 Published 2010 Journal PLoS ONE Section Body Doc Link PMC2894073 Disease Relevance 0.42 Pain Relevance 0
C31 integrase protein expression independent of integration activity, we injected the plasmids pCSmI and pLiLucB (Fig. 1b) into a group of C-MYC expressing mice (Fig. 2d, cyan).
Gene_expression (in express) of integrase protein
4) Confidence 0.10 Published 2010 Journal PLoS ONE Section Body Doc Link PMC2894073 Disease Relevance 0.42 Pain Relevance 0.19
We observed a statistically significant increase in tumor latency when inactive integrase protein was present, compared to the saline-only group (p?
Neg (inactive) Gene_expression (present) of integrase protein associated with cancer
5) Confidence 0.08 Published 2010 Journal PLoS ONE Section Body Doc Link PMC2894073 Disease Relevance 0.31 Pain Relevance 0.13

General Comments

This test has worked.

Personal tools
Namespaces

Variants
Actions
Navigation
Toolbox