INT228326

From wiki-pain
Jump to: navigation, search
Context Info
Confidence 0.41
First Reported 2008
Last Reported 2010
Negated 0
Speculated 0
Reported most in Body
Documents 3
Total Number 3
Disease Relevance 0
Pain Relevance 0.80

This is a graph with borders and nodes. Maybe there is an Imagemap used so the nodes may be linking to some Pages.

cytosol (PYCARD) signal transduction (PYCARD) intracellular (PYCARD)
cytoplasm (PYCARD)
Anatomy Link Frequency
visual system 2
PYCARD (Homo sapiens)
Pain Link Frequency Relevance Heat
Transcranial magnetic stimulation 516 100.00 Very High Very High Very High
Electroencephalography 2 72.88 Quite High
imagery 6 15.72 Low Low
magnetoencephalography 1 8.60 Low Low
Pain 15 5.00 Very Low Very Low Very Low
Somatosensory cortex 12 5.00 Very Low Very Low Very Low
anesthesia 3 5.00 Very Low Very Low Very Low
depression 3 5.00 Very Low Very Low Very Low
primary somatosensory cortex 2 5.00 Very Low Very Low Very Low
cerebral cortex 1 5.00 Very Low Very Low Very Low
Disease Link Frequency Relevance Heat
Pain 13 5.00 Very Low Very Low Very Low
Cognitive Disorder 8 5.00 Very Low Very Low Very Low
Camurati-engelmann Disease 5 5.00 Very Low Very Low Very Low
Epilepsy 4 5.00 Very Low Very Low Very Low
Depression 3 5.00 Very Low Very Low Very Low
Disease 2 5.00 Very Low Very Low Very Low
Convulsion 2 5.00 Very Low Very Low Very Low
Neurological Disease 1 5.00 Very Low Very Low Very Low
Handedness 1 5.00 Very Low Very Low Very Low
Coma 1 5.00 Very Low Very Low Very Low

Sentences Mentioned In

Key: Protein Mutation Event Anatomy Negation Speculation Pain term Disease term
Analogously, TMS in studies of the motor (Dafotakis, Grefkes, Wang, Fink, & Nowak, 2008; Kobayashi, Hutchinson, Theoret, Schlaug, & Pascual-Leone, 2004) or visual system (Chambers, Stokes, Janko, & Mattingley, 2006; Dambeck et al., 2006; Hilgetag, Theoret, & Pascual-Leone, 2001) often cause either an ipsilateral enhancement or a contralateral decrement, but rarely both complementary patterns together, despite this being the simplest prediction from strict hemispheric rivalry.
Positive_regulation (enhancement) of Localization (cause) of TMS in visual system associated with transcranial magnetic stimulation
1) Confidence 0.41 Published 2010 Journal Neuropsychologia Section Body Doc Link PMC2956832 Disease Relevance 0 Pain Relevance 0.23
There was a monotonic decrease in EMF for Standard (and Reversed) and Sham TMS as the distance increased (Fig. 2B-1).
Positive_regulation (increased) of Localization (decrease) of TMS associated with transcranial magnetic stimulation
2) Confidence 0.34 Published 2008 Journal PLoS ONE Section Body Doc Link PMC2271126 Disease Relevance 0 Pain Relevance 0.32
Here, we used controlled changes in the stimulation parameters (site, intensity, and angle of stimulation) and repeated longitudinal measurements (same day and one week apart) to evaluate the sensitivity and repeatability of TMS/hd-EEG potentials.


Positive_regulation (evaluate) of Localization (repeatability) of TMS associated with transcranial magnetic stimulation
3) Confidence 0.33 Published 2010 Journal PLoS ONE Section Abstract Doc Link PMC2858649 Disease Relevance 0 Pain Relevance 0.25

General Comments

This test has worked.

Personal tools
Namespaces

Variants
Actions
Navigation
Toolbox