INT228329

From wiki-pain
Jump to: navigation, search
Context Info
Confidence 0.65
First Reported 2008
Last Reported 2008
Negated 1
Speculated 0
Reported most in Body
Documents 1
Total Number 6
Disease Relevance 0.57
Pain Relevance 3.21

This is a graph with borders and nodes. Maybe there is an Imagemap used so the nodes may be linking to some Pages.

nucleoplasm (COIL) nucleolus (COIL) nucleus (COIL)
COIL (Homo sapiens)
Pain Link Frequency Relevance Heat
Transcranial magnetic stimulation 930 99.98 Very High Very High Very High
depression 12 94.96 High High
Pain 90 81.88 Quite High
visual analogue scale 6 76.36 Quite High
cerebral cortex 6 5.00 Very Low Very Low Very Low
Disease Link Frequency Relevance Heat
Cognitive Disorder 24 95.96 Very High Very High Very High
Depression 12 94.96 High High
Pain 78 81.88 Quite High
Camurati-engelmann Disease 30 11.24 Low Low
Disease 6 5.00 Very Low Very Low Very Low
Epilepsy 6 5.00 Very Low Very Low Very Low

Sentences Mentioned In

Key: Protein Mutation Event Anatomy Negation Speculation Pain term Disease term
First, naïve subjects received 12 pulses of Standard, Reversed and Sham TMS and were then asked whether they had noticed different kinds of TMS pulses using the Fig8 coil.
Gene_expression (using) of coil associated with transcranial magnetic stimulation
1) Confidence 0.65 Published 2008 Journal PLoS ONE Section Body Doc Link PMC2271126 Disease Relevance 0 Pain Relevance 0.45
None of the subjects were able to tell that there were different types of TMS intermixed using the Fig8 coil.
Gene_expression (using) of coil associated with transcranial magnetic stimulation
2) Confidence 0.65 Published 2008 Journal PLoS ONE Section Body Doc Link PMC2271126 Disease Relevance 0 Pain Relevance 0.43
For both the Fig8 and Circ coils, using one-way repeated measures ANOVA, EMF amplitude showed significant main effects of intensity (10, 30, 50%) for all TMS type (Standard/Reversed, Sham) and coils (Fig8, Circ) except for Sham TMS using the Fir8 coil (Fig8-Standard/Reversed: F(2,57)?
Neg (except) Gene_expression (using) of coil associated with transcranial magnetic stimulation
3) Confidence 0.65 Published 2008 Journal PLoS ONE Section Body Doc Link PMC2271126 Disease Relevance 0 Pain Relevance 0.35
First, naïve subjects received 12 pulses of Standard, Reversed and Sham TMS at 90% maximum output and were asked at the end whether there were different kinds of TMS pulses using the Fig8 coil.
Gene_expression (using) of coil associated with transcranial magnetic stimulation
4) Confidence 0.65 Published 2008 Journal PLoS ONE Section Body Doc Link PMC2271126 Disease Relevance 0 Pain Relevance 0.44
Instead, we investigated whether Standard TMS could be distinguished from Reversed TMS using the Circ coil.
Gene_expression (using) of coil associated with transcranial magnetic stimulation
5) Confidence 0.65 Published 2008 Journal PLoS ONE Section Body Doc Link PMC2271126 Disease Relevance 0 Pain Relevance 0.75
Ten trials per condition (Standard, Reversed, Sham) were randomly intermixed, using either the Fig8 or Circ coil.
Gene_expression (using) of coil
6) Confidence 0.65 Published 2008 Journal PLoS ONE Section Body Doc Link PMC2271126 Disease Relevance 0.57 Pain Relevance 0.80

General Comments

This test has worked.

Personal tools
Namespaces

Variants
Actions
Navigation
Toolbox