From wiki-pain
Jump to: navigation, search
Context Info
Confidence 0.43
First Reported 2007
Last Reported 2010
Negated 0
Speculated 0
Reported most in Body
Documents 3
Total Number 3
Disease Relevance 1.77
Pain Relevance 0.42

This is a graph with borders and nodes. Maybe there is an Imagemap used so the nodes may be linking to some Pages.

cytosol (SH2B2) signal transduction (SH2B2) plasma membrane (SH2B2)
cytoplasm (SH2B2) signal transducer activity (SH2B2)
Anatomy Link Frequency
neurons 1
tongue 1
SH2B2 (Homo sapiens)
Pain Link Frequency Relevance Heat
Action potential 11 100.00 Very High Very High Very High
cva 30 92.48 High High
tetrodotoxin 4 84.48 Quite High
cytokine 2 51.28 Quite High
midbrain 9 50.80 Quite High
Spinal cord 7 50.72 Quite High
GABAergic 2 27.12 Quite Low
Glutamate 2 8.92 Low Low
projection neuron 2 5.64 Low Low
imagery 46 5.00 Very Low Very Low Very Low
Disease Link Frequency Relevance Heat
Anti-phospholipid Antibody Syndrome 119 100.00 Very High Very High Very High
Cardiovascular Disease 6 98.32 Very High Very High Very High
Stroke 38 96.92 Very High Very High Very High
Infarction 6 96.60 Very High Very High Very High
Cv Unclassified Under Development 9 96.00 Very High Very High Very High
Thrombosis 13 94.40 High High
Embolism 2 92.48 High High
Syndrome 44 90.36 High High
Thrombosis Related Under Development 41 81.04 Quite High
Autoimmune Disease 9 79.92 Quite High

Sentences Mentioned In

Key: Protein Mutation Event Anatomy Negation Speculation Pain term Disease term
The aetiology of APS is multifactorial,11,12 and an exact, single cause cannot always be determined.
Localization (aetiology) of APS associated with anti-phospholipid antibody syndrome
1) Confidence 0.43 Published 2007 Journal Yonsei Medical Journal Section Body Doc Link PMC2628175 Disease Relevance 1.59 Pain Relevance 0.07
Notably, both Na+ currents and K+ currents contribute to the APs detected from both groups of neurons.
Localization (detected) of APs in neurons associated with action potential
2) Confidence 0.09 Published 2010 Journal PLoS ONE Section Body Doc Link PMC2912324 Disease Relevance 0.12 Pain Relevance 0.32
Traditional APs like head, mouse, or control devices using tongue or eye movements have not been accepted by patients for control of neuroprosthesis, because these APs hinder their communication ability, which is most important to patients for participation in normal social activities, and the design is not esthetic.
Localization (because) of APs in tongue
3) Confidence 0.09 Published 2010 Journal Frontiers in Neuroscience Section Body Doc Link PMC2944670 Disease Relevance 0.06 Pain Relevance 0.03

General Comments

This test has worked.

Personal tools