INT272045

From wiki-pain
Jump to: navigation, search
Context Info
Confidence 0.17
First Reported 2009
Last Reported 2009
Negated 0
Speculated 0
Reported most in Body
Documents 1
Total Number 3
Disease Relevance 1.65
Pain Relevance 0.22

This is a graph with borders and nodes. Maybe there is an Imagemap used so the nodes may be linking to some Pages.

Anatomy Link Frequency
heart 1
Cfcd (Mus musculus)
Pain Link Frequency Relevance Heat
positron emission tomography 30 100.00 Very High Very High Very High
amygdala 156 68.80 Quite High
imagery 21 63.16 Quite High
Anterior cingulate cortex 63 31.52 Quite Low
insula 45 31.20 Quite Low
Hippocampus 30 5.92 Low Low
Pain 21 5.00 Very Low Very Low Very Low
Thalamus 18 5.00 Very Low Very Low Very Low
Nucleus accumbens 6 5.00 Very Low Very Low Very Low
Autonomic response 3 5.00 Very Low Very Low Very Low
Disease Link Frequency Relevance Heat
Anxiety Disorder 285 100.00 Very High Very High Very High
Panic Disorder 3 87.32 High High
Phobia 3 86.56 High High
Post-traumatic Stress Disorder 3 86.20 High High
Cognitive Disorder 9 75.60 Quite High
Pain 15 5.00 Very Low Very Low Very Low
Nociception 9 5.00 Very Low Very Low Very Low
Urological Neuroanatomy 6 5.00 Very Low Very Low Very Low
Shock 6 5.00 Very Low Very Low Very Low
Handedness 3 5.00 Very Low Very Low Very Low

Sentences Mentioned In

Key: Protein Mutation Event Anatomy Negation Speculation Pain term Disease term
Therefore, it may be very important for trace conditioning, but less so for delay conditioning.
Localization (important) of conditioning
1) Confidence 0.17 Published 2009 Journal PLoS ONE Section Body Doc Link PMC2692002 Disease Relevance 0.24 Pain Relevance 0.10
A life time prevalence of anxiety disorders of about 16,6% [1] highlights the substantial clinical and socioeconomic relevance of fear conditioning and extinction.
Localization (relevance) of conditioning associated with anxiety disorder
2) Confidence 0.17 Published 2009 Journal PLoS ONE Section Body Doc Link PMC2692002 Disease Relevance 1.05 Pain Relevance 0
The following variables were extracted and presented in Table 1: 1) demographic characteristics (number of participants, gender, and age), 2) study design (delay, trace, and extinction), 3) neuroimaging technique (fMRI, PET), 4) characteristics of the stimuli (modality of CS and US), 5) independent assessments of the conditioning process (e.g. heart rate), and 6) neuroimaging results.
Localization (presented) of conditioning in heart associated with positron emission tomography
3) Confidence 0.16 Published 2009 Journal PLoS ONE Section Body Doc Link PMC2692002 Disease Relevance 0.36 Pain Relevance 0.12

General Comments

This test has worked.

Personal tools
Namespaces

Variants
Actions
Navigation
Toolbox