INT273206

From wiki-pain
Jump to: navigation, search
Context Info
Confidence 0.55
First Reported 2008
Last Reported 2010
Negated 0
Speculated 0
Reported most in Body
Documents 2
Total Number 6
Disease Relevance 0.08
Pain Relevance 0.03

This is a graph with borders and nodes. Maybe there is an Imagemap used so the nodes may be linking to some Pages.

OMS (Homo sapiens)
Pain Link Frequency Relevance Heat
imagery 6 52.24 Quite High
positron emission tomography 15 5.00 Very Low Very Low Very Low
Pain 5 5.00 Very Low Very Low Very Low
addiction 2 5.00 Very Low Very Low Very Low
cerebral cortex 1 5.00 Very Low Very Low Very Low
depression 1 5.00 Very Low Very Low Very Low
Opioid 1 5.00 Very Low Very Low Very Low
Disease Link Frequency Relevance Heat
Cognitive Disorder 185 83.72 Quite High
Stress 6 5.00 Very Low Very Low Very Low
Pain 5 5.00 Very Low Very Low Very Low
Burns 5 5.00 Very Low Very Low Very Low
Intellectual Impairment 5 5.00 Very Low Very Low Very Low
Unconsciousness 3 5.00 Very Low Very Low Very Low
Opiate Addiction 1 5.00 Very Low Very Low Very Low
Schizophrenia 1 5.00 Very Low Very Low Very Low
Depression 1 5.00 Very Low Very Low Very Low
Disease 1 5.00 Very Low Very Low Very Low

Sentences Mentioned In

Key: Protein Mutation Event Anatomy Negation Speculation Pain term Disease term
Nevertheless, OMs (or some of them) could be the expression of higher-level operations, such as the basic operations of linguistic thought theorized by OS.
Gene_expression (expression) of OMs
1) Confidence 0.55 Published 2010 Journal The Open Neuroimaging Journal Section Body Doc Link PMC2948146 Disease Relevance 0 Pain Relevance 0
The OMs identified by OA could be either the expression of binding operations of this kind, or of other kinds of operations.
Gene_expression (expression) of OMs
2) Confidence 0.48 Published 2010 Journal The Open Neuroimaging Journal Section Body Doc Link PMC2948146 Disease Relevance 0 Pain Relevance 0
If we accept the hypothesis that there is a correspondence between simple OMs and EOMC, we have to expect that these three sub-operations will have some correspondence in the structure of simple OMs.
Gene_expression (simple) of OMs
3) Confidence 0.48 Published 2010 Journal The Open Neuroimaging Journal Section Body Doc Link PMC2948146 Disease Relevance 0.08 Pain Relevance 0
A second kind of approach could be that of examining the OMs when subjects are presented with certain verbs, such as “to look” and “to listen”.
Gene_expression (presented) of OMs
4) Confidence 0.48 Published 2010 Journal The Open Neuroimaging Journal Section Body Doc Link PMC2948146 Disease Relevance 0 Pain Relevance 0
As we have seen, OS hypothesises the existence of three operational levels in linguistic thought, which can be related to OMs of different complexity in the OA framework:
Gene_expression (framework) of OMs
5) Confidence 0.48 Published 2010 Journal The Open Neuroimaging Journal Section Body Doc Link PMC2948146 Disease Relevance 0 Pain Relevance 0
In this sense, OMs lie in between the classical and connectionist architectures.
Gene_expression (lie) of OMs
6) Confidence 0.21 Published 2008 Journal The Open Neuroimaging Journal Section Body Doc Link PMC2695620 Disease Relevance 0 Pain Relevance 0.03

General Comments

This test has worked.

Personal tools
Namespaces

Variants
Actions
Navigation
Toolbox