INT289204

From wiki-pain
Jump to: navigation, search
Context Info
Confidence 0.05
First Reported 2009
Last Reported 2009
Negated 0
Speculated 4
Reported most in Body
Documents 1
Total Number 18
Disease Relevance 0
Pain Relevance 4.41

This is a graph with borders and nodes. Maybe there is an Imagemap used so the nodes may be linking to some Pages.

TW (Homo sapiens)
Pain Link Frequency Relevance Heat
Transcranial magnetic stimulation 3276 99.60 Very High Very High Very High
Neurobehavioral 36 62.60 Quite High
imagery 90 5.00 Very Low Very Low Very Low
Migraine 18 5.00 Very Low Very Low Very Low
magnetoencephalography 18 5.00 Very Low Very Low Very Low
positron emission tomography 18 5.00 Very Low Very Low Very Low
Disease Link Frequency Relevance Heat
Cognitive Disorder 108 5.00 Very Low Very Low Very Low
Epilepsy 18 5.00 Very Low Very Low Very Low
Headache 18 5.00 Very Low Very Low Very Low

Sentences Mentioned In

Key: Protein Mutation Event Anatomy Negation Speculation Pain term Disease term
We thus analyzed TW1, TW2, TW3, TW4 as experimental conditions of interest, one time control condition (TC), and SHAM TMS as a sham control condition (SC).
Spec (analyzed) Gene_expression (analyzed) of TW1 associated with transcranial magnetic stimulation
1) Confidence 0.05 Published 2009 Journal PLoS ONE Section Body Doc Link PMC2789405 Disease Relevance 0 Pain Relevance 0.37
We thus analyzed TW1, TW2, TW3, TW4 as experimental conditions of interest, one time control condition (TC), and SHAM TMS as a sham control condition (SC).
Spec (analyzed) Gene_expression (analyzed) of TW2 associated with transcranial magnetic stimulation
2) Confidence 0.05 Published 2009 Journal PLoS ONE Section Body Doc Link PMC2789405 Disease Relevance 0 Pain Relevance 0.37
We thus analyzed TW1, TW2, TW3, TW4 as experimental conditions of interest, one time control condition (TC), and SHAM TMS as a sham control condition (SC).
Spec (analyzed) Gene_expression (analyzed) of TW3 associated with transcranial magnetic stimulation
3) Confidence 0.05 Published 2009 Journal PLoS ONE Section Body Doc Link PMC2789405 Disease Relevance 0 Pain Relevance 0.37
In fact, RTdif was significantly higher in all three early time windows when compared to TW4 (TW1-TW4: t(259)?
Gene_expression (compared) of TW4
4) Confidence 0.05 Published 2009 Journal PLoS ONE Section Body Doc Link PMC2789405 Disease Relevance 0 Pain Relevance 0.13
We thus analyzed TW1, TW2, TW3, TW4 as experimental conditions of interest, one time control condition (TC), and SHAM TMS as a sham control condition (SC).
Spec (analyzed) Gene_expression (analyzed) of TW4 associated with transcranial magnetic stimulation
5) Confidence 0.05 Published 2009 Journal PLoS ONE Section Body Doc Link PMC2789405 Disease Relevance 0 Pain Relevance 0.37
In fact, RTdif was significantly higher in all three early time windows when compared to TW4 (TW1-TW4: t(259)?
Gene_expression (compared) of TW1
6) Confidence 0.05 Published 2009 Journal PLoS ONE Section Body Doc Link PMC2789405 Disease Relevance 0 Pain Relevance 0.13
0.74), TW2 (t(259)?
Gene_expression (0.74) of TW2
7) Confidence 0.04 Published 2009 Journal PLoS ONE Section Body Doc Link PMC2789405 Disease Relevance 0 Pain Relevance 0.34
0.63), TW4 (t(259)?
Gene_expression (0.63) of TW4
8) Confidence 0.04 Published 2009 Journal PLoS ONE Section Body Doc Link PMC2789405 Disease Relevance 0 Pain Relevance 0.34
2.33; P<0.05, TW2-TW4: t(259)?
Gene_expression (-) of TW4
9) Confidence 0.04 Published 2009 Journal PLoS ONE Section Body Doc Link PMC2789405 Disease Relevance 0 Pain Relevance 0.15
At first glance, the statistics suggest that TMS had an effect when applied over PPC in (TW1, [TW2], TW3), and when applied over MFG in ([TW1], TW3).
Gene_expression (applied) of TW1 associated with transcranial magnetic stimulation
10) Confidence 0.04 Published 2009 Journal PLoS ONE Section Body Doc Link PMC2789405 Disease Relevance 0 Pain Relevance 0.18
0.85), TW3 (t(259)?
Gene_expression (0.85) of TW3
11) Confidence 0.04 Published 2009 Journal PLoS ONE Section Body Doc Link PMC2789405 Disease Relevance 0 Pain Relevance 0.34
2.33; P<0.05, TW2-TW4: t(259)?
Gene_expression (-) of TW2
12) Confidence 0.04 Published 2009 Journal PLoS ONE Section Body Doc Link PMC2789405 Disease Relevance 0 Pain Relevance 0.15
1.66; P<0.05, TW3-TW4: t(259)?
Gene_expression (-) of TW4
13) Confidence 0.04 Published 2009 Journal PLoS ONE Section Body Doc Link PMC2789405 Disease Relevance 0 Pain Relevance 0.15
This was again confirmed statistically: RTdif was significantly higher in TW3 as compared to TW4 (t(269)?
Gene_expression (higher) of TW3
14) Confidence 0.04 Published 2009 Journal PLoS ONE Section Body Doc Link PMC2789405 Disease Relevance 0 Pain Relevance 0.21
This was again confirmed statistically: RTdif was significantly higher in TW3 as compared to TW4 (t(269)?
Gene_expression (compared) of TW4
15) Confidence 0.04 Published 2009 Journal PLoS ONE Section Body Doc Link PMC2789405 Disease Relevance 0 Pain Relevance 0.21
RTdif in TW3 was significantly higher than both TC (t(259)?
Gene_expression (RTdif) of TW3
16) Confidence 0.04 Published 2009 Journal PLoS ONE Section Body Doc Link PMC2789405 Disease Relevance 0 Pain Relevance 0.22
1.66; P<0.05, TW3-TW4: t(259)?
Gene_expression (-) of TW3
17) Confidence 0.04 Published 2009 Journal PLoS ONE Section Body Doc Link PMC2789405 Disease Relevance 0 Pain Relevance 0.15
RTdif in TW2 was marginally higher than both TC (t(259)?
Gene_expression (RTdif) of TW2
18) Confidence 0.04 Published 2009 Journal PLoS ONE Section Body Doc Link PMC2789405 Disease Relevance 0 Pain Relevance 0.23

General Comments

This test has worked.

Personal tools
Namespaces

Variants
Actions
Navigation
Toolbox