INT289211

From wiki-pain
Jump to: navigation, search
Context Info
Confidence 0.09
First Reported 2009
Last Reported 2010
Negated 0
Speculated 0
Reported most in Body
Documents 11
Total Number 12
Disease Relevance 0.19
Pain Relevance 2.69

This is a graph with borders and nodes. Maybe there is an Imagemap used so the nodes may be linking to some Pages.

extracellular space (MFGE8) extracellular region (MFGE8) cell adhesion (MFGE8)
Anatomy Link Frequency
brain 1
parietal 1
MFGE8 (Homo sapiens)
Pain Link Frequency Relevance Heat
Transcranial magnetic stimulation 1820 99.98 Very High Very High Very High
imagery 54 97.36 Very High Very High Very High
anesthesia 46 82.04 Quite High
Neurobehavioral 20 5.00 Very Low Very Low Very Low
Migraine 10 5.00 Very Low Very Low Very Low
magnetoencephalography 10 5.00 Very Low Very Low Very Low
positron emission tomography 10 5.00 Very Low Very Low Very Low
Electroencephalography 2 5.00 Very Low Very Low Very Low
Disease Link Frequency Relevance Heat
Persistent Vegetative State 2 94.64 High High
Unconsciousness 12 26.56 Quite Low
Cognitive Disorder 74 5.00 Very Low Very Low Very Low
Epilepsy 10 5.00 Very Low Very Low Very Low
Headache 10 5.00 Very Low Very Low Very Low
Coma 2 5.00 Very Low Very Low Very Low
Sleep Disorders 2 5.00 Very Low Very Low Very Low
Hernia 2 5.00 Very Low Very Low Very Low

Sentences Mentioned In

Key: Protein Mutation Event Anatomy Negation Speculation Pain term Disease term
Per participant, the identified PPC cluster was seeded into GCM analysis to locate MFG.
Localization (locate) of MFG
1) Confidence 0.09 Published 2009 Journal PLoS ONE Section Body Doc Link PMC2789405 Disease Relevance 0 Pain Relevance 0.07
RTdif for PPC and MFG were not significantly different for any of our time windows: TW1 (t(259)?
Localization (RTdif) of MFG
2) Confidence 0.09 Published 2009 Journal PLoS ONE Section Body Doc Link PMC2789405 Disease Relevance 0 Pain Relevance 0.34
TMS chronometry did not reveal differences between the timing of functional relevance of PPC and MFG, thus suggesting that they were functionally relevant at the same time.
Localization (relevance) of MFG associated with transcranial magnetic stimulation
3) Confidence 0.09 Published 2009 Journal PLoS ONE Section Body Doc Link PMC2789405 Disease Relevance 0 Pain Relevance 0.29
After all, interestingly, fMRI EC did successfully map a behaviorally relevant brain network, as indicated by the TMS-revealed functional relevance of PPC and MFG.
Localization (relevance) of MFG in brain associated with transcranial magnetic stimulation
4) Confidence 0.09 Published 2009 Journal PLoS ONE Section Body Doc Link PMC2789405 Disease Relevance 0 Pain Relevance 0.30
Also, PPC and MFG ceased to be functionally relevant in the same time window.
Localization (relevant) of MFG
5) Confidence 0.09 Published 2009 Journal PLoS ONE Section Body Doc Link PMC2789405 Disease Relevance 0 Pain Relevance 0.25
This would seem to predict functional relevance of MFG before PPC, in the TMS data.
Localization (relevance) of MFG associated with transcranial magnetic stimulation
6) Confidence 0.09 Published 2009 Journal PLoS ONE Section Body Doc Link PMC2789405 Disease Relevance 0 Pain Relevance 0.30
Overall, it seems that both TMS over PPC and TMS over MFG had an effect on task-specific reaction times, as measured by RTdif scores.
Localization (over) of MFG associated with transcranial magnetic stimulation
7) Confidence 0.09 Published 2009 Journal PLoS ONE Section Body Doc Link PMC2789405 Disease Relevance 0 Pain Relevance 0.19
However, statistical tests indicated functional relevance of PPC in early time windows (TW1), while no convincing statistical evidence was found for relevance of MFG in these time windows.
Localization (relevance) of MFG
8) Confidence 0.09 Published 2009 Journal PLoS ONE Section Body Doc Link PMC2789405 Disease Relevance 0 Pain Relevance 0.25
The direction of influence was invariably frontal-to-parietal, flowing from MFG to PPC.
Localization (flowing) of MFG in parietal
9) Confidence 0.09 Published 2009 Journal PLoS ONE Section Body Doc Link PMC2789405 Disease Relevance 0 Pain Relevance 0.16
At first glance, the statistics suggest that TMS had an effect when applied over PPC in (TW1, [TW2], TW3), and when applied over MFG in ([TW1], TW3).
Localization (applied) of MFG associated with transcranial magnetic stimulation
10) Confidence 0.09 Published 2009 Journal PLoS ONE Section Body Doc Link PMC2789405 Disease Relevance 0 Pain Relevance 0.18
Furthermore the current sleep experiment findings revealed locations around BA4, BA7, and BA9.
Localization (locations) of BA9
11) Confidence 0.01 Published 2010 Journal Nonlinear Biomed Phys Section Body Doc Link PMC2880803 Disease Relevance 0.09 Pain Relevance 0.18
Furthermore the current sleep experiment findings revealed locations around BA4, BA7, and BA9.
Localization (locations) of BA7
12) Confidence 0.01 Published 2010 Journal Nonlinear Biomed Phys Section Body Doc Link PMC2880803 Disease Relevance 0.09 Pain Relevance 0.18

General Comments

This test has worked.

Personal tools
Namespaces

Variants
Actions
Navigation
Toolbox