INT298945

From wiki-pain
Jump to: navigation, search
Context Info
Confidence 0.36
First Reported 2010
Last Reported 2010
Negated 0
Speculated 0
Reported most in Body
Documents 1
Total Number 10
Disease Relevance 3.80
Pain Relevance 0

This is a graph with borders and nodes. Maybe there is an Imagemap used so the nodes may be linking to some Pages.

cytosol (NME2) small molecule metabolic process (NME2) cell adhesion (NME2)
nucleus (NME2) DNA binding (NME2) kinase activity (NME2)
NME2 (Homo sapiens)
Pain Link Frequency Relevance Heat
Pain 10 5.00 Very Low Very Low Very Low
Disease Link Frequency Relevance Heat
Leishmaniasis 380 97.80 Very High Very High Very High
Infection 100 66.28 Quite High
Disease 100 46.08 Quite Low
Sprains And Strains 30 5.00 Very Low Very Low Very Low
American Trypanosomiasis 20 5.00 Very Low Very Low Very Low
Acute Disease 10 5.00 Very Low Very Low Very Low
Coronary Heart Disease 10 5.00 Very Low Very Low Very Low
Communicable Diseases 10 5.00 Very Low Very Low Very Low
Emaciation 10 5.00 Very Low Very Low Very Low
Asymptomatic Infections 10 5.00 Very Low Very Low Very Low

Sentences Mentioned In

Key: Protein Mutation Event Anatomy Negation Speculation Pain term Disease term
The other PUF proteins (rLiPUF3, rLiPUF6, rLiPUF7, rLiPUF9b and rLiPUF10) showed a lower recognition, but they were specifically recognized by some of the VL sera.
PUF Binding (recognition) of associated with leishmaniasis
1) Confidence 0.36 Published 2010 Journal BMC Res Notes Section Body Doc Link PMC2830943 Disease Relevance 0.48 Pain Relevance 0
The other PUF proteins (rLiPUF3, rLiPUF6, rLiPUF7, rLiPUF9b and rLiPUF10) showed a lower recognition, but they were specifically recognized by some of the VL sera.
PUF Binding (recognition) of associated with leishmaniasis
2) Confidence 0.36 Published 2010 Journal BMC Res Notes Section Body Doc Link PMC2830943 Disease Relevance 0.48 Pain Relevance 0
The other PUF proteins (rLiPUF3, rLiPUF6, rLiPUF7, rLiPUF9b and rLiPUF10) showed a lower recognition, but they were specifically recognized by some of the VL sera.
PUF Binding (recognition) of associated with leishmaniasis
3) Confidence 0.36 Published 2010 Journal BMC Res Notes Section Body Doc Link PMC2830943 Disease Relevance 0.48 Pain Relevance 0
Given the prominent recognition of rLiPUF1 and rLiPUF2 by sera from L. infantum-infected hamsters, we assayed the reactivity of 10 sera from VL patients against each one of these recombinant proteins (figure 3B).
PUF Binding (recognition) of associated with leishmaniasis
4) Confidence 0.36 Published 2010 Journal BMC Res Notes Section Body Doc Link PMC2830943 Disease Relevance 0.31 Pain Relevance 0
The other PUF proteins (rLiPUF3, rLiPUF6, rLiPUF7, rLiPUF9b and rLiPUF10) showed a lower recognition, but they were specifically recognized by some of the VL sera.
PUF Binding (recognition) of associated with leishmaniasis
5) Confidence 0.36 Published 2010 Journal BMC Res Notes Section Body Doc Link PMC2830943 Disease Relevance 0.48 Pain Relevance 0
Given the prominent recognition of rLiPUF1 and rLiPUF2 by sera from L. infantum-infected hamsters, we assayed the reactivity of 10 sera from VL patients against each one of these recombinant proteins (figure 3B).
PUF Binding (recognition) of associated with leishmaniasis
6) Confidence 0.36 Published 2010 Journal BMC Res Notes Section Body Doc Link PMC2830943 Disease Relevance 0.30 Pain Relevance 0
The other PUF proteins (rLiPUF3, rLiPUF6, rLiPUF7, rLiPUF9b and rLiPUF10) showed a lower recognition, but they were specifically recognized by some of the VL sera.
PUF Binding (recognition) of associated with leishmaniasis
7) Confidence 0.36 Published 2010 Journal BMC Res Notes Section Body Doc Link PMC2830943 Disease Relevance 0.49 Pain Relevance 0
Antigenicity and specificity of rLiPUF1 and rLiPUF2 in human patients
PUF Binding (Antigenicity) of
8) Confidence 0.36 Published 2010 Journal BMC Res Notes Section Body Doc Link PMC2830943 Disease Relevance 0.29 Pain Relevance 0
Antigenicity and specificity of rLiPUF1 and rLiPUF2 in human patients
PUF Binding (Antigenicity) of
9) Confidence 0.36 Published 2010 Journal BMC Res Notes Section Body Doc Link PMC2830943 Disease Relevance 0.29 Pain Relevance 0
Thus, for example, rLiPUF1 was highly recognized by serum from animals 2, 7 and 9, whereas rLiPUF2 was recognized better by sera 4 and 5.
PUF Binding (recognized) of
10) Confidence 0.35 Published 2010 Journal BMC Res Notes Section Body Doc Link PMC2830943 Disease Relevance 0.20 Pain Relevance 0

General Comments

This test has worked.

Personal tools
Namespaces

Variants
Actions
Navigation
Toolbox