INT30011
From wiki-pain
|
|
|
|
|
Sentences Mentioned In
Key: | Protein | Mutation | Event | Anatomy | Negation | Speculation | Pain term | Disease term |
While the SI-SEP and AI-AEP were minimally but significantly affected, fentanyl dose-dependently decreased the Vx-SEP and Vx-AEP. | |||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||
|
The decrease of the Vx-SEP and Vx-AEP was parallelled by the dose-dependent decrease of the amount of CS-induced fear-conditioned behaviour. | |||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||
|
However, SEP suppression by 50% occurred only at large (1.5 EC(50)) concentrations of propofol, and a measurable SEP was present in 8 of 18 rats, even at 10.8 EC(50). | |||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||
|
Decreasing the amplitude of the SEP (downtraining) was associated with an increase in noxious sensitivity. | |||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||
|
These results suggest that the dose-dependent decrease of the Vx-SEP amplitude, rather than of the SI-SEP, indicates that the US was experienced as less unpleasant. | |||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||
|
These results suggest that the dose-dependent decrease of the Vx-SEP amplitude, rather than of the SI-SEP, indicates that the US was experienced as less unpleasant. | |||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||
|
Patients with MOH had larger-amplitude block 1 SEPs than controls, and also lacked SEP habituation. | |||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||
|
During EAE, the SEP decreased considerably and their onset was delayed. | |||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||
|
When the first SEP component had decreased to 40-50% of control, the animals were retransfused to a MAP of 60-80 mmHg, to prevent further deterioration of SEP, and maintained at the new pressure level for the rest of the experiment. | |||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||
|
This resulted in transient bradycardia and attenuated SEP. | |||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||
|
There was an absence of SEP in surface recordings, indicating a loss of sensory function in the hindlimbs following transection injury. | |||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||
|
In corticosterone-treated cells the punctate synaptic SEP-GluR2 fluorescence started to decrease immediately on exposure to NMDA with a time course similar to the decrease in diffuse non-synaptic SEP-GluR2 (Figure 4B, D). | |||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||
|
In direct contrast to control cells, the punctate and diffuse SEP-GluR2 in corticosterone-treated cells showed similar loss of SEP-GluR2 fluorescence kinetics upon NMDAR activation. | |||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||
|
Further, there was a much greater initial loss of SEP-GluR2 fluorescence from non-punctate regions. | |||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||
|
PI3, SERPINB4, CYP2C8, EFEMP2 and SEPP1 were decreased, and AKR1C2 and MKNK1 were increased in interstitial cystitis cases. | |||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||
|
Generally, spines exhibiting SEP-GluR1 loss had a lower spine-mito score and less mitochondrial association than those without loss. | |||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||
|
Both the spine-mito score and the percentage of spines associated with mitochondria showed a significant difference between bright spines that lost SEP-GluR1 signals and those exhibited no change under A? | |||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||
|
-O (<500 nM oligomers, based on the western blot) resulted in a marked loss of surface SEP-GluR1 at numerous spines (lower panels in Figure 1a, arrows; see also Figure S2 in Additional file 1), whereas similar exposure to a control saline (HBS) had no effect (upper panels in Figure 1a; see also Figure S2 in Additional file 1). | |||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||
|
General Comments
This test has worked.