INT302668

From wiki-pain
Jump to: navigation, search
Context Info
Confidence 0.69
First Reported 2010
Last Reported 2010
Negated 0
Speculated 0
Reported most in Body
Documents 8
Total Number 9
Disease Relevance 0.07
Pain Relevance 0.28

This is a graph with borders and nodes. Maybe there is an Imagemap used so the nodes may be linking to some Pages.

cytoskeletal protein binding (PTPN4) plasma membrane (PTPN4) cytoskeleton (PTPN4)
cytoplasm (PTPN4)
Anatomy Link Frequency
shell 1
ventricles 1
white matter 1
PTPN4 (Homo sapiens)
Pain Link Frequency Relevance Heat
magnetoencephalography 11 100.00 Very High Very High Very High
amygdala 75 92.56 High High
addiction 27 44.48 Quite Low
imagery 43 5.00 Very Low Very Low Very Low
anesthesia 12 5.00 Very Low Very Low Very Low
deep brain stimulation 6 5.00 Very Low Very Low Very Low
alcohol 6 5.00 Very Low Very Low Very Low
Hippocampus 6 5.00 Very Low Very Low Very Low
Pain 3 5.00 Very Low Very Low Very Low
Autonomic response 3 5.00 Very Low Very Low Very Low
Disease Link Frequency Relevance Heat
Schizophrenia 3 74.24 Quite High
Cognitive Disorder 24 5.00 Very Low Very Low Very Low
Epilepsy 10 5.00 Very Low Very Low Very Low
Sleep Disorders 6 5.00 Very Low Very Low Very Low
Drug Dependence 6 5.00 Very Low Very Low Very Low
Disease 4 5.00 Very Low Very Low Very Low
Pain 3 5.00 Very Low Very Low Very Low
Handedness 3 5.00 Very Low Very Low Very Low
Coma 2 5.00 Very Low Very Low Very Low
Depression 2 5.00 Very Low Very Low Very Low

Sentences Mentioned In

Key: Protein Mutation Event Anatomy Negation Speculation Pain term Disease term
However, as we needed to have an unbiased comparison of MEG and EEG source localization, we used the three shell BEM model for both.
Localization (localization) of MEG in shell
1) Confidence 0.69 Published 2010 Journal PLoS ONE Section Body Doc Link PMC2898804 Disease Relevance 0 Pain Relevance 0
In order to evaluate the possibility that some of the differences between MEG and EEG spindles noted at the sensors would be attenuated at their cortical sources, we performed source localization on simultaneously recorded MEG and EEG.
Localization (localization) of MEG
2) Confidence 0.64 Published 2010 Journal PLoS ONE Section Body Doc Link PMC2898804 Disease Relevance 0 Pain Relevance 0
Sources were not estimated for surfaces that represented deep white matter, ventricles, or noncortical structures unlikely to generate extracranial MEG or EEG signals.
Localization (generate) of MEG in ventricles
3) Confidence 0.64 Published 2010 Journal PLoS ONE Section Body Doc Link PMC2898804 Disease Relevance 0 Pain Relevance 0
MEG and EEG sources are poorly correlated but moderately coherent
Localization (correlated) of MEG
4) Confidence 0.64 Published 2010 Journal PLoS ONE Section Body Doc Link PMC2898804 Disease Relevance 0 Pain Relevance 0
This approach was applied to all three inverse solutions (calculated from EEG, MEG and both combined), and in Figure 6 they are mapped onto each individual's cortical surface.
Localization (calculated) of MEG
5) Confidence 0.64 Published 2010 Journal PLoS ONE Section Body Doc Link PMC2898804 Disease Relevance 0 Pain Relevance 0
Sources were not estimated for surfaces that represented deep white matter, ventricles, or noncortical structures unlikely to generate extracranial MEG or EEG signals.
Localization (generate) of MEG in white matter
6) Confidence 0.22 Published 2010 Journal PLoS ONE Section Body Doc Link PMC2898804 Disease Relevance 0 Pain Relevance 0
A direct comparison between MEG and EEG localization accuracy using implanted sources in vivo found an average error of 0.8 cm for MEG and 1 cm for EEG using a multi-layered spherical forward model (Cohen et al. 1990).
Localization (localization) of MEG associated with magnetoencephalography
7) Confidence 0.17 Published 2010 Journal J Comput Neurosci Section Body Doc Link PMC2912982 Disease Relevance 0 Pain Relevance 0.10
A direct comparison between MEG and EEG localization accuracy using implanted sources in vivo found an average error of 0.8 cm for MEG and 1 cm for EEG using a multi-layered spherical forward model (Cohen et al. 1990).
Localization (localization) of MEG associated with magnetoencephalography
8) Confidence 0.17 Published 2010 Journal J Comput Neurosci Section Body Doc Link PMC2912982 Disease Relevance 0 Pain Relevance 0.10
EEG and MEG were considered poor for localization in general and specifically for deep structures such as the amygdale.
Localization (localization) of MEG
9) Confidence 0.12 Published 2010 Journal PLoS ONE Section Body Doc Link PMC2842434 Disease Relevance 0.07 Pain Relevance 0.08

General Comments

This test has worked.

Personal tools
Namespaces

Variants
Actions
Navigation
Toolbox