INT310113

From wiki-pain
Jump to: navigation, search
Context Info
Confidence 0.15
First Reported 2010
Last Reported 2010
Negated 0
Speculated 0
Reported most in Body
Documents 1
Total Number 7
Disease Relevance 0.05
Pain Relevance 0.08

This is a graph with borders and nodes. Maybe there is an Imagemap used so the nodes may be linking to some Pages.

nucleus (SET, TP53INP2) cytosol (SET) nucleoplasm (SET)
nucleocytoplasmic transport (SET) histone binding (SET) endoplasmic reticulum (SET)
Anatomy Link Frequency
medial 1
lateral 1
SET (Homo sapiens)
TP53INP2 (Homo sapiens)
Pain Link Frequency Relevance Heat
imagery 343 53.44 Quite High
Neurobehavioral 7 5.00 Very Low Very Low Very Low
reflex sympathetic dystrophy 7 5.00 Very Low Very Low Very Low
Disease Link Frequency Relevance Heat
Handedness 203 51.40 Quite High
Cognitive Disorder 35 26.68 Quite Low
Disease 7 5.00 Very Low Very Low Very Low
Cerebral Palsy 7 5.00 Very Low Very Low Very Low
Stroke 7 5.00 Very Low Very Low Very Low
Complex Regional Pain Syndromes 7 5.00 Very Low Very Low Very Low
Mental Disorders 7 5.00 Very Low Very Low Very Low

Sentences Mentioned In

Key: Protein Mutation Event Anatomy Negation Speculation Pain term Disease term
The results indicate that the context in which the stimuli (i.e., Set-1 stimuli) are embedded is of influence on the strategy use, as the interaction of Set by DOR is significant.
Set Binding (interaction) of DOR
1) Confidence 0.15 Published 2010 Journal Exp Brain Res Section Body Doc Link PMC2871105 Disease Relevance 0 Pain Relevance 0.03
The results indicate that the context in which the stimuli (i.e., Set-1 stimuli) are embedded is of influence on the strategy use, as the interaction of Set by DOR is significant.
Set Binding (interaction) of DOR
2) Confidence 0.12 Published 2010 Journal Exp Brain Res Section Body Doc Link PMC2871105 Disease Relevance 0.05 Pain Relevance 0.03
As can be seen, the significant interaction of Set by DOR (P < 0.01) as represented by the differences in RTs between lateral and medial rotation (i.e., DOR) increases with increasing number of axes of rotation. * indicate significance at the P < 0.05 level, ** indicate significance at the P < 0.01 level.
Set Binding (interaction) of DOR in medial
3) Confidence 0.12 Published 2010 Journal Exp Brain Res Section Body Doc Link PMC2871105 Disease Relevance 0 Pain Relevance 0
A significant Set by DOR interaction would indicate that the influence of biomechanical constraints (as measured with DOR) differs between sets.
Set Binding (interaction) of DOR
4) Confidence 0.09 Published 2010 Journal Exp Brain Res Section Body Doc Link PMC2871105 Disease Relevance 0 Pain Relevance 0.03
The ANOVA resulted in a significant interaction of Set by DOR [F(2,22) = 8.196, P < 0.01, ?
Set Binding (interaction) of DOR
5) Confidence 0.09 Published 2010 Journal Exp Brain Res Section Body Doc Link PMC2871105 Disease Relevance 0 Pain Relevance 0
In order to support our hypothesis about increasing difference in RT between laterally and medially rotated stimuli, we expected a significant interaction between Set and direction of rotation (DOR).
Set Binding (interaction) of DOR
6) Confidence 0.09 Published 2010 Journal Exp Brain Res Section Body Doc Link PMC2871105 Disease Relevance 0 Pain Relevance 0
As can be seen, the significant interaction of Set by DOR (P < 0.01) as represented by the differences in RTs between lateral and medial rotation (i.e., DOR) increases with increasing number of axes of rotation. * indicate significance at the P < 0.05 level, ** indicate significance at the P < 0.01 level.
Set Binding (interaction) of DOR in lateral
7) Confidence 0.04 Published 2010 Journal Exp Brain Res Section Body Doc Link PMC2871105 Disease Relevance 0 Pain Relevance 0

General Comments

This test has worked.

Personal tools
Namespaces

Variants
Actions
Navigation
Toolbox