INT310119

From wiki-pain
Jump to: navigation, search
Context Info
Confidence 0.32
First Reported 2010
Last Reported 2010
Negated 0
Speculated 0
Reported most in Body
Documents 5
Total Number 5
Disease Relevance 0.49
Pain Relevance 0.05

This is a graph with borders and nodes. Maybe there is an Imagemap used so the nodes may be linking to some Pages.

cytosol (SET) nucleoplasm (SET) nucleocytoplasmic transport (SET)
histone binding (SET) endoplasmic reticulum (SET) nucleus (SET)
SET (Homo sapiens)
Pain Link Frequency Relevance Heat
imagery 98 54.96 Quite High
chemokine 8 36.16 Quite Low
COX2 6 6.80 Low Low
cINOD 4 5.00 Very Low Very Low Very Low
depression 2 5.00 Very Low Very Low Very Low
Pain 2 5.00 Very Low Very Low Very Low
Neurobehavioral 2 5.00 Very Low Very Low Very Low
Kinase C 2 5.00 Very Low Very Low Very Low
reflex sympathetic dystrophy 2 5.00 Very Low Very Low Very Low
Central nervous system 1 5.00 Very Low Very Low Very Low
Disease Link Frequency Relevance Heat
Recurrence 20 84.76 Quite High
Cancer 86 65.88 Quite High
Colon Cancer 124 60.20 Quite High
Brain Tumor 2 57.64 Quite High
Pancreatic Cancer 2 57.00 Quite High
Lung Cancer 4 56.24 Quite High
Stomach Cancer 2 55.64 Quite High
Metastasis 16 31.72 Quite Low
Breast Cancer 8 21.12 Low Low
Handedness 58 5.00 Very Low Very Low Very Low

Sentences Mentioned In

Key: Protein Mutation Event Anatomy Negation Speculation Pain term Disease term
As we only obtained a significant DOR effect in the sets including palm view stimuli, one might argue that only the palm view stimuli accounted for the obtained DOR effect in Set-2 and Set-3.
Regulation (accounted) of Gene_expression (effect) of Set
1) Confidence 0.32 Published 2010 Journal Exp Brain Res Section Body Doc Link PMC2871105 Disease Relevance 0 Pain Relevance 0.03
As we only obtained a significant DOR effect in the sets including palm view stimuli, one might argue that only the palm view stimuli accounted for the obtained DOR effect in Set-2 and Set-3.
Regulation (accounted) of Gene_expression (effect) of Set
2) Confidence 0.32 Published 2010 Journal Exp Brain Res Section Body Doc Link PMC2871105 Disease Relevance 0 Pain Relevance 0.03
Short and long-term cost-effectiveness of SET strategies versus DET strategies
Regulation (effectiveness) of Gene_expression (strategies) of SET
3) Confidence 0.14 Published 2010 Journal BMC Pediatr Section Body Doc Link PMC2978208 Disease Relevance 0 Pain Relevance 0
As described previously, not all genes in Gene Set I had a change in expression level.
Regulation (change) of Gene_expression (expression) of Set
4) Confidence 0.06 Published 2010 Journal Cancer Informatics Section Body Doc Link PMC2918356 Disease Relevance 0.41 Pain Relevance 0
Genes in this third set had parallel expression and copy number change (e.g. copy number increase paralleled up-regulated expression).
Regulation (regulated) of Gene_expression (expression) of set
5) Confidence 0.06 Published 2010 Journal Cancer Informatics Section Body Doc Link PMC2918356 Disease Relevance 0.08 Pain Relevance 0

General Comments

This test has worked.

Personal tools
Namespaces

Variants
Actions
Navigation
Toolbox