INT340324

From wiki-pain
Jump to: navigation, search
Context Info
Confidence 0.13
First Reported 2010
Last Reported 2010
Negated 0
Speculated 1
Reported most in Body
Documents 1
Total Number 6
Disease Relevance 1.17
Pain Relevance 1.47

This is a graph with borders and nodes. Maybe there is an Imagemap used so the nodes may be linking to some Pages.

protein modification process (Ppt1) extracellular space (Ppt1) cofactor metabolic process (Ppt1)
extracellular region (Ppt1) Golgi apparatus (Ppt1) nucleus (Ppt1)
Ppt1 (Mus musculus)
Pain Link Frequency Relevance Heat
lumbar region 84 95.60 Very High Very High Very High
Pain 246 94.00 High High
Pain threshold 6 77.88 Quite High
nociceptor 6 68.88 Quite High
Hyperalgesia 12 5.00 Very Low Very Low Very Low
shoulder pain 6 5.00 Very Low Very Low Very Low
backache 6 5.00 Very Low Very Low Very Low
Disease Link Frequency Relevance Heat
Pain 246 94.00 High High
Hyperalgesia 12 5.00 Very Low Very Low Very Low
Obesity 12 5.00 Very Low Very Low Very Low
Handedness 6 5.00 Very Low Very Low Very Low
Neck Pain 6 5.00 Very Low Very Low Very Low
Low Back Pain 6 5.00 Very Low Very Low Very Low
Osteoporosis 6 5.00 Very Low Very Low Very Low
Shoulder Pain 6 5.00 Very Low Very Low Very Low

Sentences Mentioned In

Key: Protein Mutation Event Anatomy Negation Speculation Pain term Disease term
Therefore, it is most likely that peripheral and central mechanisms are responsible for gender differences in PPT.
Regulation (responsible) of PPT
1) Confidence 0.13 Published 2010 Journal BMC Musculoskelet Disord Section Body Doc Link PMC2964538 Disease Relevance 0.49 Pain Relevance 0.56
The mean value of the two measurements with the lowest variance was used as the PPT value of this point.
Regulation (value) of PPT
2) Confidence 0.08 Published 2010 Journal BMC Musculoskelet Disord Section Body Doc Link PMC2964538 Disease Relevance 0.23 Pain Relevance 0.25
For the normalization procedure for each subject we divided all absolute PPT values by the mean PPT value.
Regulation (value) of PPT
3) Confidence 0.08 Published 2010 Journal BMC Musculoskelet Disord Section Body Doc Link PMC2964538 Disease Relevance 0.08 Pain Relevance 0.15
Both absolute PPT values and normalized PPT values were analyzed.
Regulation (values) of PPT
4) Confidence 0.08 Published 2010 Journal BMC Musculoskelet Disord Section Body Doc Link PMC2964538 Disease Relevance 0.14 Pain Relevance 0.19
Both absolute PPT values and normalized PPT values were analyzed.
Spec (analyzed) Regulation (values) of PPT
5) Confidence 0.08 Published 2010 Journal BMC Musculoskelet Disord Section Body Doc Link PMC2964538 Disease Relevance 0.14 Pain Relevance 0.19
For the normalization procedure for each subject we divided all absolute PPT values by the mean PPT value.
Regulation (values) of PPT
6) Confidence 0.08 Published 2010 Journal BMC Musculoskelet Disord Section Body Doc Link PMC2964538 Disease Relevance 0.08 Pain Relevance 0.13

General Comments

This test has worked.

Personal tools
Namespaces

Variants
Actions
Navigation
Toolbox