INT52185

From wiki-pain
Jump to: navigation, search
Context Info
Confidence 0.66
First Reported 1995
Last Reported 2010
Negated 0
Speculated 0
Reported most in Body
Documents 4
Total Number 4
Disease Relevance 2.03
Pain Relevance 0.09

This is a graph with borders and nodes. Maybe there is an Imagemap used so the nodes may be linking to some Pages.

Anatomy Link Frequency
external 1
DCR (Homo sapiens)
Pain Link Frequency Relevance Heat
Perioperative pain 1 92.04 High High
anesthesia 6 20.08 Low Low
lidocaine 5 8.00 Low Low
cva 3 5.00 Very Low Very Low Very Low
Inflammation 2 5.00 Very Low Very Low Very Low
Disease Link Frequency Relevance Heat
Lacrimal Apparatus Diseases 24 96.56 Very High Very High Very High
Post Operative Pain 1 92.04 High High
Hemorrhage 7 88.52 High High
Injury 15 88.00 High High
Postoperative Complications 3 85.36 High High
Cicatrix 4 84.84 Quite High
Ocular Toxicity (including Many Sub-types) 16 82.00 Quite High
Disorders Of The Lacrimal System 65 74.00 Quite High
Dacryocystitis 5 60.88 Quite High
Mucocele 2 58.40 Quite High

Sentences Mentioned In

Key: Protein Mutation Event Anatomy Negation Speculation Pain term Disease term
We modified this technique using simple instruments such as the curette, Kerrison punch, Freer elevator, Storz endoscope, Ellman Surgitron unit, and the Javate DCR electrodes instead of the laser.
Gene_expression (electrodes) of DCR
1) Confidence 0.66 Published 1995 Journal Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg Section Abstract Doc Link 7748825 Disease Relevance 0.60 Pain Relevance 0.09
In this prospective study, we share our experience of a new modification in external DCR technique.
Gene_expression (technique) of DCR in external
2) Confidence 0.58 Published 2010 Journal Oman Journal of Ophthalmology Section Body Doc Link PMC2886236 Disease Relevance 0.41 Pain Relevance 0
Endoscopic DCR with laser assistance is successful between 58 and 85 percent of the time (6,8,9), whereas endoscopic DCR procedures using other tools (eg. drill, cold knife, punch) appear to yield slightly higher success rates (10-11).
Gene_expression (procedures) of DCR
3) Confidence 0.49 Published 2006 Journal Journal of Korean Medical Science Section Body Doc Link PMC2729897 Disease Relevance 0.51 Pain Relevance 0
Endoscopic DCR with laser assistance is successful between 58 and 85 percent of the time (6,8,9), whereas endoscopic DCR procedures using other tools (eg. drill, cold knife, punch) appear to yield slightly higher success rates (10-11).
Gene_expression (procedures) of DCR
4) Confidence 0.49 Published 2006 Journal Journal of Korean Medical Science Section Body Doc Link PMC2729897 Disease Relevance 0.51 Pain Relevance 0

General Comments

This test has worked.

Personal tools
Namespaces

Variants
Actions
Navigation
Toolbox