INT56532

From wiki-pain
Jump to: navigation, search
Context Info
Confidence 0.24
First Reported 1993
Last Reported 2008
Negated 0
Speculated 0
Reported most in Body
Documents 2
Total Number 8
Disease Relevance 0.06
Pain Relevance 1.12

This is a graph with borders and nodes. Maybe there is an Imagemap used so the nodes may be linking to some Pages.

mitochondrion (Dhrs4) oxidoreductase activity (Dhrs4) peroxisome (Dhrs4)
Dhrs4 (Rattus norvegicus)
Pain Link Frequency Relevance Heat
Glutamate 8 99.98 Very High Very High Very High
Neurotransmitter 16 97.78 Very High Very High Very High
Neuropeptide 2 97.32 Very High Very High Very High
Opioid 1 97.02 Very High Very High Very High
Dopamine 182 90.88 High High
agonist 168 90.16 High High
Enkephalin 1 90.00 High High
antagonist 77 89.12 High High
dopamine receptor 140 69.28 Quite High
ketamine 14 22.48 Low Low
Disease Link Frequency Relevance Heat
Shock 70 60.16 Quite High
Body Weight 14 24.08 Low Low
Depression 21 5.00 Very Low Very Low Very Low

Sentences Mentioned In

Key: Protein Mutation Event Anatomy Negation Speculation Pain term Disease term
Treatment with various substances such as antiandrogen, opioids, neuropeptides, and neurotransmitters significantly modulated the pineal androgen receptor population: cyproterone acetate and monosodium glutamate suppressed CR; growth hormone releasing hormone increased NR; growth hormone release inhibiting hormone had no significant effects on either group of receptors; exogenous melatonin and norepinephrine increased NR; beta-endorphin increased only NR, but methionine enkephalin stimulated both, and epithalamine had no significant effects on either group of receptors, but thymosin alpha 1 increased NR.
Negative_regulation (suppressed) of CR associated with glutamate, neurotransmitter, neuropeptide, enkephalin and opioid
1) Confidence 0.24 Published 1993 Journal Neuroendocrinology Section Abstract Doc Link 8097577 Disease Relevance 0 Pain Relevance 0.39
However, paired comparison of the numbers of CR+ and CR?
Negative_regulation (numbers) of CR
2) Confidence 0.01 Published 2008 Journal Cerebral Cortex (New York, NY) Section Body Doc Link PMC2567422 Disease Relevance 0 Pain Relevance 0.04
However, paired comparison of the numbers of CR+ and CR?
Negative_regulation (numbers) of CR
3) Confidence 0.01 Published 2008 Journal Cerebral Cortex (New York, NY) Section Body Doc Link PMC2567422 Disease Relevance 0 Pain Relevance 0.04
Comparison of the numbers of CR+ and CR?
Negative_regulation (numbers) of CR
4) Confidence 0.01 Published 2008 Journal Cerebral Cortex (New York, NY) Section Body Doc Link PMC2567422 Disease Relevance 0 Pain Relevance 0
This is due to both increases in the numbers of CR+ and decreases in the numbers of CR?
Negative_regulation (numbers) of CR
5) Confidence 0.01 Published 2008 Journal Cerebral Cortex (New York, NY) Section Body Doc Link PMC2567422 Disease Relevance 0.06 Pain Relevance 0
Comparison of the numbers of CR+ and CR?
Negative_regulation (numbers) of CR
6) Confidence 0.01 Published 2008 Journal Cerebral Cortex (New York, NY) Section Body Doc Link PMC2567422 Disease Relevance 0 Pain Relevance 0
Student's 2-tailed t-test for paired comparisons was used to compare the numbers of CR+ and CR?.
Negative_regulation (numbers) of CR
7) Confidence 0.01 Published 2008 Journal Cerebral Cortex (New York, NY) Section Body Doc Link PMC2567422 Disease Relevance 0 Pain Relevance 0.33
Student's 2-tailed t-test for paired comparisons was used to compare the numbers of CR+ and CR?.
Negative_regulation (numbers) of CR
8) Confidence 0.01 Published 2008 Journal Cerebral Cortex (New York, NY) Section Body Doc Link PMC2567422 Disease Relevance 0 Pain Relevance 0.33

General Comments

This test has worked.

Personal tools
Namespaces

Variants
Actions
Navigation
Toolbox