INT70625

Context Info Confidence 0.59 First Reported 1997 Last Reported 2010 Negated 0 Speculated 0 Reported most in Body Documents 3 Total Number 4 Disease Relevance 1.54 Pain Relevance 1.12

Anatomy Link Frequency EPI 1 epi (Mus musculus)

Pain Link Frequency Relevance Heat imagery 2 100.00 Perioperative pain 22 99.56 Somatosensory cortex 2 99.10 Pain 46 81.20 Pain score 22 68.64 agonist 1 64.96 primary somatosensory cortex 1 55.04 Morphine 5 50.00 epidural 3 50.00 analgesia 2 50.00

Disease Link Frequency Relevance Heat Post Operative Pain 24 99.56 Astigmatism 8 95.72 Myopia 12 95.24 Pain 66 81.20 Targeted Disruption 2 70.64 Sleep Disorders 1 58.88 INFLAMMATION 8 5.00 Apoptosis 6 5.00 Corneal Disease 4 5.00 Diabetes Mellitus 2 5.00

Sentences Mentioned In

Key:

Protein

Mutation

Event

Anatomy

Negation

Speculation

Pain term

Disease term

CONCLUSION: Analgesic efficacy of EM is decreased when 2-CP is used for LEA compared to when Lido + Epi is used.

Gene_expression (used) of Epi

1) Confidence 0.59 Published 1997 Journal Acta Anaesthesiol Scand Section Body Doc Link 9241341 Disease Relevance 0 Pain Relevance 0

Using the forepaw stimulation paradigm, we observed BOLD contrast in the contralateral somatosensory cortex in approximately 50% of the performed scans using gradient echo-echo planar imaging (GE-EPI).

Gene_expression (using) of GE-EPI in EPI associated with somatosensory cortex and imagery

2) Confidence 0.29 Published 2010 Journal Neuroimage Section Abstract Doc Link 20211267 Disease Relevance 0.20 Pain Relevance 0.25

In addition, compared with earlier techniques, reduced postoperative pain and haze levels were expected after epi-LASIK and were confirmed by some reports [4,14].

Gene_expression (expected) of epi-LASIK associated with perioperative pain

3) Confidence 0.04 Published 2010 Journal Korean Journal of Ophthalmology : KJO Section Body Doc Link PMC2882076 Disease Relevance 0.59 Pain Relevance 0.31

At one week and one month after the surface ablation procedure, visual acuities were lower in the epi-LASIK group than in the PRK group (Fig. 3).

Gene_expression (group) of epi-LASIK

4) Confidence 0.04 Published 2010 Journal Korean Journal of Ophthalmology : KJO Section Body Doc Link PMC2882076 Disease Relevance 0.74 Pain Relevance 0.57

General Comments

This test has worked.