INT7339

From wiki-pain
Jump to: navigation, search
Context Info
Confidence 0.75
First Reported 1992
Last Reported 2011
Negated 0
Speculated 0
Reported most in Body
Documents 46
Total Number 52
Disease Relevance 16.15
Pain Relevance 16.47

This is a graph with borders and nodes. Maybe there is an Imagemap used so the nodes may be linking to some Pages.

Anatomy Link Frequency
neck 3
covering 2
spinal 1
Purkinje cells 1
nucleus 1
CALM1 (Homo sapiens)
Pain Link Frequency Relevance Heat
complementary and alternative medicine 3706 100.00 Very High Very High Very High
Kinase C 2 99.84 Very High Very High Very High
Arthritis 62 99.48 Very High Very High Very High
Analgesic 37 99.38 Very High Very High Very High
Enkephalin 1 99.38 Very High Very High Very High
Pain 444 99.36 Very High Very High Very High
Opioid 17 99.32 Very High Very High Very High
alcohol 6 98.52 Very High Very High Very High
addiction 9 98.30 Very High Very High Very High
Acupuncture 273 97.96 Very High Very High Very High
Disease Link Frequency Relevance Heat
Breast Cancer 53 99.88 Very High Very High Very High
Diabetes Mellitus 421 99.70 Very High Very High Very High
Cancer 720 99.50 Very High Very High Very High
Hypertension 376 99.50 Very High Very High Very High
Juvenile Chronic Polyarthritis 37 99.48 Very High Very High Very High
Pain 377 99.36 Very High Very High Very High
Neuroblastoma 3 99.28 Very High Very High Very High
Thymus Neoplasms 16 99.26 Very High Very High Very High
Obesity 39 98.96 Very High Very High Very High
Diabetes Complications 21 98.52 Very High Very High Very High

Sentences Mentioned In

Key: Protein Mutation Event Anatomy Negation Speculation Pain term Disease term
One limitation of these prior estimates is that rates of CAM use have not been reported separately for infants versus older children.
Localization (use) of CAM associated with complementary and alternative medicine
1) Confidence 0.75 Published 2008 Journal Evidence-based Complementary and Alternative Medicine : eCAM Section Body Doc Link PMC2586313 Disease Relevance 0.45 Pain Relevance 0.61
A willingness on the part of these men to be informed about CAM was linked to their desire to know as much as possible about their illness generally, including their conventional treatment options.
Localization (informed) of CAM associated with complementary and alternative medicine
2) Confidence 0.74 Published 2007 Journal BMC Complement Altern Med Section Body Doc Link PMC2000907 Disease Relevance 0.42 Pain Relevance 0.29
Thus, statutory regulation of CAM is not simply about granting professional recognition to CAM practitioners; it is first about protecting consumers' health and enabling them to make informed choices.
Localization (regulation) of CAM associated with complementary and alternative medicine
3) Confidence 0.73 Published 2011 Journal Evidence-based Complementary and Alternative Medicine : eCAM Section Body Doc Link PMC2952302 Disease Relevance 0.07 Pain Relevance 0.23
Health care seeking and Frequency of use of CAM
Localization (use) of CAM associated with complementary and alternative medicine
4) Confidence 0.72 Published 2010 Journal BMC Complement Altern Med Section Body Doc Link PMC2912779 Disease Relevance 0.05 Pain Relevance 0.08
The frequency of utilization of CAM is increasing worldwide, and is well documented in both African and other global populations to be between 20 - 80% [8-10].
Localization (utilization) of CAM associated with complementary and alternative medicine
5) Confidence 0.72 Published 2010 Journal BMC Complement Altern Med Section Body Doc Link PMC2912779 Disease Relevance 0.44 Pain Relevance 0.09
On the other hand, the use of CAM was found to increase among older children (6–12 years: 5%; 13–17 years: 9.8%).
Localization (use) of CAM associated with complementary and alternative medicine
6) Confidence 0.70 Published 2008 Journal Evidence-based Complementary and Alternative Medicine : eCAM Section Body Doc Link PMC2586313 Disease Relevance 0.48 Pain Relevance 0.80
In bivariate analyses, age, salary, general health, trust in their physician, addiction to alcohol or drugs, and obesity were not found to be significantly associated with CAM use (?
Localization (use) of CAM associated with complementary and alternative medicine, addiction, obesity and alcohol
7) Confidence 0.66 Published 2007 Journal BMC Complement Altern Med Section Body Doc Link PMC1884175 Disease Relevance 0.28 Pain Relevance 0.51
Service branch, occupational category, marital status, and number of sick days were removed from the model because they were not significantly predictive of CAM use and did not display evidence suggesting possible confounding as measured by a 15% difference in odds ratio.
Localization (use) of CAM associated with complementary and alternative medicine
8) Confidence 0.66 Published 2007 Journal BMC Complement Altern Med Section Body Doc Link PMC1884175 Disease Relevance 0.22 Pain Relevance 0.50
Those having moderate to severe body pain were twice as likely to report CAM use independent of other factors including education and salary.
Localization (use) of CAM in body associated with complementary and alternative medicine and pain
9) Confidence 0.66 Published 2007 Journal BMC Complement Altern Med Section Body Doc Link PMC1884175 Disease Relevance 0.34 Pain Relevance 0.54
Participants reported extensive use of CAM with conventional medicines.
Localization (use) of CAM
10) Confidence 0.66 Published 2011 Journal Evidence-based Complementary and Alternative Medicine : eCAM Section Abstract Doc Link PMC2952338 Disease Relevance 0.53 Pain Relevance 0
The result indicates that people with Type 2 diabetes reported more use of CAM after being diagnosed with diabetes.

3.3.

Localization (use) of CAM associated with diabetes mellitus
11) Confidence 0.66 Published 2011 Journal Evidence-based Complementary and Alternative Medicine : eCAM Section Body Doc Link PMC2952338 Disease Relevance 0.73 Pain Relevance 0.04
The third section of the survey, based on a review of Taiwanese and English language literature, focused on patterns of CAM use including: the reasons for CAM use, factors influencing the decision to use CAM, the administration of CAM with conventional treatments, the disclosure of CAM use to healthcare professionals, and the reasons for not using CAM or ceasing CAM.
Localization (use) of CAM
12) Confidence 0.66 Published 2011 Journal Evidence-based Complementary and Alternative Medicine : eCAM Section Body Doc Link PMC2952338 Disease Relevance 0.15 Pain Relevance 0
Special attention was paid to patients' changing patterns of CAM use before and after diagnosis with Type 2 diabetes, their experience of CAM use, and their management of CAM use with conventional medicines.
Localization (use) of CAM associated with diabetes mellitus
13) Confidence 0.66 Published 2011 Journal Evidence-based Complementary and Alternative Medicine : eCAM Section Abstract Doc Link PMC2952338 Disease Relevance 0.43 Pain Relevance 0
Thus, understanding the reasons for patients' CAM use is important as it will help healthcare professionals to understand the factors that underpin patients' beliefs and attitudes towards their health care.
Localization (use) of CAM
14) Confidence 0.66 Published 2011 Journal Evidence-based Complementary and Alternative Medicine : eCAM Section Body Doc Link PMC2952338 Disease Relevance 0.51 Pain Relevance 0
For each CAM, users were asked to differentiate between their use of CAM to manage their diabetes, to manage diabetic complications, or for others reasons.
Localization (use) of CAM associated with diabetes complications and diabetes mellitus
15) Confidence 0.66 Published 2011 Journal Evidence-based Complementary and Alternative Medicine : eCAM Section Body Doc Link PMC2952338 Disease Relevance 0.78 Pain Relevance 0.04
This study explored CAM use among patients who attend diabetic clinics for followup treatment.
Localization (use) of CAM associated with diabetes mellitus
16) Confidence 0.66 Published 2011 Journal Evidence-based Complementary and Alternative Medicine : eCAM Section Abstract Doc Link PMC2952338 Disease Relevance 0.41 Pain Relevance 0
It has been reported that, frequently, patients do not disclose their use of CAM to their medical practitioner on the assumption that the "doctor does not need to know" and that "the doctor did not ask" [15].
Localization (use) of CAM associated with complementary and alternative medicine
17) Confidence 0.65 Published 2008 Journal BMC Public Health Section Body Doc Link PMC2322980 Disease Relevance 0.18 Pain Relevance 0.37
These findings indicate that CAM is being sought for a small percentage of infants, although the reasons for such CAM use were not specified.
Localization (use) of CAM associated with complementary and alternative medicine
18) Confidence 0.65 Published 2008 Journal Evidence-based Complementary and Alternative Medicine : eCAM Section Body Doc Link PMC2586313 Disease Relevance 0.40 Pain Relevance 0.94
Some authors have warned that patients' growing use of CAM will increasingly impact on 'conventional' NHS consultations, with GPs increasingly having to decide on their attitude towards CAM [4].
Localization (use) of CAM associated with complementary and alternative medicine
19) Confidence 0.65 Published 2007 Journal BMC Complement Altern Med Section Body Doc Link PMC1896178 Disease Relevance 0 Pain Relevance 0.49
A survey of GPs in the former Avon area of England in 1986 found that while doctors regarded their knowledge of CAM to be poor, 59% regarded specific therapies (e.g. acupuncture, herbal medicine and homeopathy) to be useful to their patients, particularly favouring spinal manipulation [9].
Localization (knowledge) of CAM in spinal associated with complementary and alternative medicine and acupuncture
20) Confidence 0.65 Published 2007 Journal BMC Complement Altern Med Section Body Doc Link PMC1896178 Disease Relevance 0 Pain Relevance 0.47

General Comments

This test has worked.

Personal tools
Namespaces

Variants
Actions
Navigation
Toolbox