INT74465
From wiki-pain
|
|
|
|
|
Sentences Mentioned In
Key: | Protein | Mutation | Event | Anatomy | Negation | Speculation | Pain term | Disease term |
The less active enantiomer L-796,325 did not block NK1 agonist evoked activity at up to 10 mg kg(-1) and had no effect on behavioural or electrophysiological changes following nerve injury, indicating that the effects of GR205171 were attributable to selective NK1 receptor blockade. | |||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||
|
Whereas the long-term (24 h) response of both receptors to recurrent hypoxia in piglet brainstem is similar, i.e. upregulation, the short-term (5 min) response to single or recurrent hypoxia, albeit in rats, is different: radiolabelled NK-1 receptors are greatly reduced, suggesting enhanced endocytosis, but mu-opioid receptors remain unchanged, implying unaltered endocytosis. | |||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||
|
Peripheral NK1 receptor blockade did not alter endothelial expression of intercellular adhesion molecule-1 or local chemokine and cytokine production, but decreased polymorphonuclear cell and macrophage recruitment. | |||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||
|
This suggests that EA-induced suppression of hyperalgesia is involved, at least partly, in the suppression of the spinal NK-1 receptors induced by sustained peripheral nociceptive input. | |||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||
|
RESULTS: Systemic and peripherally selective, but not intrathecal, NK1 receptor blockade reduced stress-induced antinociception (control: 177 +/- 9 g, L-733,060: 117 +/- 8 g, and control: 166 +/- 30 g, SR140333: 89 +/- 3 g; both P < 0.05, t test) without affecting baseline hyperalgesia. | |||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||
|
We have examined the effect of a tachykinin NK1 and a bradykinin B2 antagonist, and a mu-opioid agonist on plasma extravasation observed in response to two differing nerve stimulating parameters (10 V, 1 ms, 2 Hz and 25 V, 2 ms, 10 Hz). | |||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||
|
These observations demonstrate that blockade of NK-1 receptors over a three day period failed to significantly modify the course of experimental colitis. | |||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||
|
Depletion of NK1 receptors in the NTS due to either ageing or acute hypoxia correlates with a markedly reduced respiratory response to substance P. | |||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||
|
Only SP mRNA was increased significantly in T4 and brainstem during CoAO, while SCS decreased the mRNA levels of SP, NK-1 and TRPV1 significantly in T4 and the brainstem. | |||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||
|
Immunohistochemistry was employed to visualize NK1 receptors and pCREB in spinal cord sections. | |||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||
|
In a separate population of 17 of 45 cells tested, brachial nerve stimulation evoked an excitatory response that was antagonized by blockade of NK1 receptors. | |||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||
|
In addition, the internalization NK1 or NK3 receptor was reversible. | |||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||
|
Application of tetrodotoxin blocked NK1 receptor internalization induced by NMDA, demonstrating that the release of neurokinins is dependent of axon potential propagation. | |||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||
|
These effects were abolished by the combination of B2 and CGRP1 blockade as well as by B2 antagonism in capsaicinized rats, while NK1 blockade was ineffective. | |||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||
|
The effects of SP were partially blocked by both the neurokinin-1 (NK1) and neurokinin-2 (NK2) receptor antagonists. | |||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||
|
It is possible that the presence of CTA on the N terminus of substance P reduces the NK1 selectivity of the peptide. | |||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||
|
We propose that the lack of endogenous SP in naked mole-rats means that heat-evoked foot withdrawal is only mediated by AMPA receptors in naïve animals, but that in the presence of SP, NMDA receptor sensitization leads to their involvement in nociceptive signaling and therefore inhibition of either NK1 or NMDA receptors reverses SP-induced sensitization.
| |||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||
|
We further examined how the blockade of TRPV1, CGRP, neurokinin 1 (NK1), or CGRP/NK1 receptors in the periphery affected the CAP-evoked inflammation and what differences there were by using dose-response analyses of antagonistic effects. | |||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||
|
The CAP-induced edema was also reduced by either blockade of CGRP or NK1 receptors, but the NK1 antagonist (spantide I) produced a much stronger inhibition of edema. | |||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||
|
Comparison of their inhibitory effects by these doses shows that vasodilation following CAP injection could be reduced by blockade of CGRP or NK1 receptors. | |||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||
|
General Comments
This test has worked.