INT82886

From wiki-pain
Jump to: navigation, search
Context Info
Confidence 0.49
First Reported 1999
Last Reported 2010
Negated 0
Speculated 0
Reported most in Abstract
Documents 7
Total Number 7
Disease Relevance 3.61
Pain Relevance 1.89

This is a graph with borders and nodes. Maybe there is an Imagemap used so the nodes may be linking to some Pages.

plasma membrane (Mip) transmembrane transport (Mip)
Anatomy Link Frequency
limb 1
parathyroid 1
T cell 1
Mip (Rattus norvegicus)
Pain Link Frequency Relevance Heat
chemokine 19 100.00 Very High Very High Very High
cva 72 99.82 Very High Very High Very High
Inflammation 32 99.80 Very High Very High Very High
anesthesia 6 99.48 Very High Very High Very High
Neuritis 2 95.08 Very High Very High Very High
Neuropathic pain 1 91.72 High High
Inflammatory response 3 79.08 Quite High
imagery 3 77.44 Quite High
cytokine 10 76.76 Quite High
reflex sympathetic dystrophy 2 75.00 Quite High
Disease Link Frequency Relevance Heat
Subarachnoid Hemorrhage 70 99.82 Very High Very High Very High
INFLAMMATION 33 99.80 Very High Very High Very High
Hypercalcemia 8 99.34 Very High Very High Very High
Congenital Anomalies 2 97.96 Very High Very High Very High
Adhesions 18 96.04 Very High Very High Very High
Recurrence 2 95.44 Very High Very High Very High
Immunization 2 95.20 Very High Very High Very High
Experimental Autoimmune Neuritis 2 95.08 Very High Very High Very High
Disease 5 93.52 High High
Neuropathic Pain 1 91.72 High High

Sentences Mentioned In

Key: Protein Mutation Event Anatomy Negation Speculation Pain term Disease term
Interferon-gamma-inducible protein (IP)-10, monocyte chemotactic protein (MCP)-1, macrophage inflammatory protein (MIP)-1alpha, the regulated upon activation normal T cell expressed and secreted chemokine (RANTES), and lymphotactin were analyzed on days 0 (pre-immunization), 7 (preclinical stage), 10 (disease onset), 13 (clinical progression), 17 (disease peak), as well as on days 20, 24, and 34 post-immunization (p.i.)
Positive_regulation (regulated) of MIP in T cell associated with chemokine, inflammation, immunization and disease
1) Confidence 0.49 Published 1999 Journal J. Neuroimmunol. Section Abstract Doc Link 10408979 Disease Relevance 0.73 Pain Relevance 0.44
The technical aspects of this procedure are described, and the results obtained in 255 patients who underwent MIP are compared with those of 401 patients who underwent conventional bilateral cervical exploration under general anesthesia.
Positive_regulation (underwent) of MIP associated with anesthesia
2) Confidence 0.40 Published 2004 Journal World J Surg Section Abstract Doc Link 15517494 Disease Relevance 0 Pain Relevance 0.19
Usage of general vs local anesthesia with intravenous sedation was 46% and 49%, respectively, in patients w ho underwent MIP; 46% were dismissed as outpatients, 49% had single-night stays.
Positive_regulation (underwent) of MIP
3) Confidence 0.22 Published 2005 Journal Arch Surg Section Body Doc Link 15897443 Disease Relevance 0 Pain Relevance 0
Changes in the management of primary HPT have occurred since introducing MIP including localization, anesthesia, intraoperative parathyroid hormone monitoring, and indications for parathyroidectomy.
Positive_regulation (introducing) of MIP in parathyroid associated with anesthesia and hypercalcemia
4) Confidence 0.22 Published 2005 Journal Arch Surg Section Abstract Doc Link 15897443 Disease Relevance 0.46 Pain Relevance 0.10
Furthermore, we observed marked SAH-induced upregulation of the chemokines MIP-1?
Positive_regulation (upregulation) of MIP associated with chemokine and cva
5) Confidence 0.20 Published 2010 Journal Crit Care Section Body Doc Link PMC2945141 Disease Relevance 1.64 Pain Relevance 0.67
The results uphold the hypothesis that a MIP initially not involving limb movement is effective for CRPS1 and support the involvement of cortical abnormalities in the development of this disorder.
Positive_regulation (effective) of MIP in limb associated with congenital anomalies
6) Confidence 0.17 Published 2004 Journal Pain Section Abstract Doc Link 15109523 Disease Relevance 0.78 Pain Relevance 0.49
Capdevila and colleagues[16] reported that patients with low P0.1 and P0.1/MIP failed extubation, Mergoni and colleagues[30] reported excellent prediction of success in weaning using P0.1/MIP, while Del Rosario[31] found similar P0.1/MIP values in patients with weaning success and failure.
Positive_regulation (using) of MIP
7) Confidence 0.06 Published 2008 Journal Indian Journal of Critical Care Medicine : Peer-reviewed, Official Publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine Section Body Doc Link PMC2760915 Disease Relevance 0 Pain Relevance 0

General Comments

This test has worked.

Personal tools
Namespaces

Variants
Actions
Navigation
Toolbox