INT92321

Context Info Confidence 0.23 First Reported 2000 Last Reported 2008 Negated 0 Speculated 1 Reported most in Body Documents 3 Total Number 4 Disease Relevance 1.15 Pain Relevance 0.65

Impact (Rattus norvegicus)

Pain Link Frequency Relevance Heat Fibrositis 5 100.00 Arthritis 1 100.00 Pain 25 98.80 visual analogue scale 3 82.96 backache 5 71.28 Paresthesia 1 5.00 Trigeminal neuralgia 1 5.00

Disease Link Frequency Relevance Heat Torticollis 4 100.00 Sleep Disorders 3 100.00 Arthritis 1 100.00 Pain 24 98.80 Low Back Pain 5 71.28 Disease 13 30.52 Halitosis 2 5.00 Mouth Ulcer 2 5.00 Rigor 2 5.00 Toothache 1 5.00

Sentences Mentioned In

Key:

Protein

Mutation

Event

Anatomy

Negation

Speculation

Pain term

Disease term

OBJECTIVE: To assess the responsiveness of the Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQ), patient ratings of pain intensity, number of tender points, and total tender point pain intensity score to perceived changes in clinical status in patients with fibromyalgia (FM).

Regulation (responsiveness) of Impact associated with pain and fibrositis

1) Confidence 0.23 Published 2000 Journal J. Rheumatol. Section Abstract Doc Link 11093454 Disease Relevance 0.46 Pain Relevance 0.33

In order to analyse the relative burden of impacts among dimensions, three intuitive descriptors of the causes of impacts were used: "impact value", i.e., number of impacts generating a given causal entity, regardless of the dimensions they were recorded in; "impact extension", i.e., the number of dimensions affected by a given causal entity; and "impact prominence", i.e., the percentage of impacts attributable to a given causal entity in a given dimension.

Regulation (affected) of impact extension

2) Confidence 0.07 Published 2008 Journal Health Qual Life Outcomes Section Body Doc Link PMC2631008 Disease Relevance 0 Pain Relevance 0.04

Meenan et al [19], in a three group (placebo, oral gold, injectable gold) randomized controlled trial, investigated the sensitivity to change of the Arthritis Impact Measurement Scales and several other clinical measures.

Spec (investigated) Regulation (sensitivity) of Impact associated with arthritis

3) Confidence 0.04 Published 2005 Journal Health Qual Life Outcomes Section Body Doc Link PMC1084357 Disease Relevance 0.23 Pain Relevance 0.18

We compared the responsiveness of the Cervical Dystonia Impact Profile (CDIP-58), Medical Outcome Study Short Form-Health Survey (SF-36), Functional Disability Questionnaire (FDQ), and Pain and Activities of Daily Living subscales of the Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale (TWSTRS) in participants with cervical dystonia treated with botulinum toxin A.

Regulation (responsiveness) of Dystonia Impact Profile associated with pain and torticollis

4) Confidence 0.00 Published 2006 Journal Neurology Section Abstract Doc Link 17190951 Disease Relevance 0.45 Pain Relevance 0.10

General Comments

This test has worked.