INT118433

From wiki-pain
Revision as of 15:54, 14 September 2012 by Daniel (Talk | contribs)

(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search
Context Info
Confidence 0.52
First Reported 2004
Last Reported 2008
Negated 0
Speculated 0
Reported most in Body
Documents 6
Total Number 9
Disease Relevance 5.01
Pain Relevance 5.37

This is a graph with borders and nodes. Maybe there is an Imagemap used so the nodes may be linking to some Pages.

Anatomy Mention Frequency
thoracic 2
spine 1
arm 1
extremity 1
smt (Drosophila melanogaster)
Pain Term Frequency Confidence Heat
Pain 686 99.84 Very High Very High Very High
backache 78 99.00 Very High Very High Very High
hypoalgesia 76 96.12 Very High Very High Very High
visual analogue scale 32 95.04 Very High Very High Very High
Quantitative sensory testing 64 74.64 Quite High
Acupuncture 56 70.44 Quite High
carpal tunnel syndrome 4 68.20 Quite High
analgesia 12 54.80 Quite High
Analgesic 4 54.56 Quite High
imagery 4 33.12 Quite Low
Disease Term Frequency Confidence Heat
Pain 636 99.84 Very High Very High Very High
Low Back Pain 110 99.16 Very High Very High Very High
Hypoalagesia 76 96.12 Very High Very High Very High
Compartment Syndromes 4 84.32 Quite High
Neck Pain 10 83.00 Quite High
Carpal Tunnel Syndrome 4 68.20 Quite High
Bone Disease 4 48.16 Quite Low
Adhesions 8 38.08 Quite Low
Hyperalgesia 20 12.52 Low Low
Ulcers 4 5.00 Very Low Very Low Very Low

Sentences Mentioned In

Key: Protein Mutation Event Anatomy Negation Speculation Pain term Disease term
Influence of SMT on pain perception in the lower extremity and back by group assignment
Regulation (Influence) of SMT in extremity associated with pain
1) Confidence 0.52 Published 2008 Journal BMC Musculoskelet Disord Section Body Doc Link PMC2270829 Disease Relevance 0.69 Pain Relevance 0.69
The SMT technique was used in our prior study [7] and has been shown to be effective in the treatment of low back pain in subjects meeting a clinical prediction rule [2,6].
Regulation (effective) of SMT associated with low back pain and backache
2) Confidence 0.38 Published 2008 Journal BMC Musculoskelet Disord Section Body Doc Link PMC2270829 Disease Relevance 0.85 Pain Relevance 0.93
Our decision to include a single experimental session rather than multiple sessions is similar to prior studies which have emphasized the immediate hypoalgesic effect of SMT [16], however we acknowledge that the outcomes we observed may differ over repeated sessions.
Regulation (effect) of SMT
3) Confidence 0.38 Published 2008 Journal BMC Musculoskelet Disord Section Body Doc Link PMC2270829 Disease Relevance 0.67 Pain Relevance 0.90
Influence of SMT on pain perception in the low back by group assignment
Regulation (Influence) of SMT associated with pain
4) Confidence 0.23 Published 2008 Journal BMC Musculoskelet Disord Section Body Doc Link PMC2270829 Disease Relevance 0.88 Pain Relevance 0.88
Future trials should examine well-defined subgroups of patients, further address the value of SMT and MOB for acute patients, establish optimal number of treatment visits and consider the cost-effectiveness of care.


Regulation (value) of SMT
5) Confidence 0.19 Published 2004 Journal Spine J Section Body Doc Link 15125860 Disease Relevance 0 Pain Relevance 0
This paper outlines the rationale and design for a randomised controlled trial that compares the effectiveness of SMT and Graston Technique to the placebo treatment of non-functional ultrasound in the treatment of non-specific thoracic pain.
Regulation (effectiveness) of SMT in thoracic associated with pain
6) Confidence 0.14 Published 2008 Journal Chiropr Osteopat Section Body Doc Link PMC2584064 Disease Relevance 0.32 Pain Relevance 0.41
We propose a study to determine the efficacy of SMT compared to Graston Technique in the treatment of non specific thoracic pain.


Regulation (efficacy) of SMT in thoracic associated with pain
7) Confidence 0.05 Published 2008 Journal Chiropr Osteopat Section Body Doc Link PMC2584064 Disease Relevance 0.38 Pain Relevance 0.30
The objective of this trial is to determine the efficacy of SMT and GT compared to a placebo for the treatment of non specific thoracic spine pain.


Regulation (efficacy) of SMT in spine associated with pain
8) Confidence 0.05 Published 2008 Journal Chiropr Osteopat Section Abstract Doc Link PMC2584064 Disease Relevance 0.69 Pain Relevance 0.69
The aim of this three arm trial is to test the efficacy of SMT and GT as independent modalities compared to detuned ultrasound for the outcomes of pain and disability measured using the Visual analogue scale (VAS) and a modified Oswestry Back Pain Disability Index.
Regulation (efficacy) of SMT in arm associated with low back pain, pain and visual analogue scale
9) Confidence 0.05 Published 2008 Journal Chiropr Osteopat Section Body Doc Link PMC2584064 Disease Relevance 0.53 Pain Relevance 0.57

General Comments

This test has worked.

Personal tools
Namespaces

Variants
Actions
Navigation
Toolbox