INT131133

From wiki-pain
Revision as of 05:11, 23 September 2012 by Daniel (Talk | contribs)

(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search
Context Info
Confidence 0.36
First Reported 2005
Last Reported 2010
Negated 0
Speculated 0
Reported most in Body
Documents 9
Total Number 9
Disease Relevance 2.13
Pain Relevance 0.19

This is a graph with borders and nodes. Maybe there is an Imagemap used so the nodes may be linking to some Pages.

cytosol (HMBS) small molecule metabolic process (HMBS) nucleus (HMBS)
cytoplasm (HMBS)
HMBS (Homo sapiens)
Pain Link Frequency Relevance Heat
Inflammation 99 90.00 High High
agonist 120 68.40 Quite High
cINOD 8 38.56 Quite Low
Inflammatory response 18 12.20 Low Low
cytokine 6 5.00 Very Low Very Low Very Low
Kinase C 6 5.00 Very Low Very Low Very Low
Arthritis 6 5.00 Very Low Very Low Very Low
tetrodotoxin 4 5.00 Very Low Very Low Very Low
Bioavailability 4 5.00 Very Low Very Low Very Low
alcohol 3 5.00 Very Low Very Low Very Low
Disease Link Frequency Relevance Heat
Papillomavirus Infection 12 99.52 Very High Very High Very High
Cancer 314 98.16 Very High Very High Very High
Targeted Disruption 42 98.12 Very High Very High Very High
Cervical Cancer 6 96.40 Very High Very High Very High
Disease 15 92.80 High High
INFLAMMATION 116 90.00 High High
Neurodegenerative Disease 1 88.00 High High
Wound Healing 12 76.60 Quite High
Apoptosis 80 72.20 Quite High
Colon Cancer 33 66.88 Quite High

Sentences Mentioned In

Key: Protein Mutation Event Anatomy Negation Speculation Pain term Disease term
The normalized ratio for IGFBP3 abundance was calculated as the ratio of IGFBP-3/PBGD for each sample divided by the IGFBP-3/PBGD ratio of the calibrator.
PBGD Binding (ratio) of
1) Confidence 0.36 Published 2008 Journal BMC Cancer Section Body Doc Link PMC2409350 Disease Relevance 0 Pain Relevance 0
Most studies focus on various aspects of the UPS, such as substrate recognition, ubiquitination, deubiquitination or proteasome activity, and do not provide a complete picture of the UPS as an integral system.
UPS Binding (recognition) of
2) Confidence 0.31 Published 2005 Journal Essays Biochem. Section Abstract Doc Link 16250901 Disease Relevance 0.36 Pain Relevance 0.04
receptor turnover and interaction with the UPS.
UPS Binding (interaction) of
3) Confidence 0.10 Published 2008 Journal PPAR Research Section Body Doc Link PMC2423003 Disease Relevance 0 Pain Relevance 0.03
UPS, PPARs, and interactions with other signaling
UPS Binding (interactions) of
4) Confidence 0.09 Published 2008 Journal PPAR Research Section Body Doc Link PMC2423003 Disease Relevance 0.30 Pain Relevance 0.04
often the targets of UPS alterations.
UPS Binding (alterations) of
5) Confidence 0.08 Published 2008 Journal PPAR Research Section Body Doc Link PMC2423003 Disease Relevance 0.78 Pain Relevance 0
UPS-dependent proteolysis, which may affect greatly the ligand-independent
UPS Binding (independent) of
6) Confidence 0.08 Published 2008 Journal PPAR Research Section Body Doc Link PMC2423003 Disease Relevance 0.05 Pain Relevance 0
multiple interactions between PPARs and the UPS need to be taken in
UPS Binding (interactions) of
7) Confidence 0.08 Published 2008 Journal PPAR Research Section Body Doc Link PMC2423003 Disease Relevance 0.28 Pain Relevance 0.07
interact with the ubiquitin-proteasome system (UPS), which is the major
UPS Binding (interact) of
8) Confidence 0.08 Published 2008 Journal PPAR Research Section Body Doc Link PMC2423003 Disease Relevance 0.36 Pain Relevance 0
WD repeats can specifically recognize phosphorylated substrates for UPS-mediated degradation [35]–[37].
UPS Binding (recognize) of
9) Confidence 0.02 Published 2010 Journal PLoS ONE Section Body Doc Link PMC2844417 Disease Relevance 0 Pain Relevance 0

General Comments

This test has worked.

Personal tools
Namespaces

Variants
Actions
Navigation
Toolbox