INT151939

From wiki-pain
Revision as of 08:06, 23 September 2012 by Daniel (Talk | contribs)

(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search
Context Info
Confidence 0.65
First Reported 2001
Last Reported 2007
Negated 0
Speculated 0
Reported most in Body
Documents 4
Total Number 5
Disease Relevance 1.65
Pain Relevance 0

This is a graph with borders and nodes. Maybe there is an Imagemap used so the nodes may be linking to some Pages.

NPCDR1 (Homo sapiens)
Pain Link Frequency Relevance Heat
methadone 2 50.00 Quite Low
colic 2 5.00 Very Low Very Low Very Low
Inflammation 2 5.00 Very Low Very Low Very Low
Pain 2 5.00 Very Low Very Low Very Low
headache 2 5.00 Very Low Very Low Very Low
Disease Link Frequency Relevance Heat
Cold Sores 72 82.16 Quite High
Hepatitis C Virus Infection 2 76.76 Quite High
Candida Infection 4 70.88 Quite High
Infection 71 68.00 Quite High
Canker Sores 4 64.08 Quite High
Herpes Simplex Virus Infection 48 63.48 Quite High
Hepatitis 6 62.92 Quite High
Disease 4 58.80 Quite High
Gastroenteritis 14 58.44 Quite High
Herpes Virus Infection 6 44.84 Quite Low

Sentences Mentioned In

Key: Protein Mutation Event Anatomy Negation Speculation Pain term Disease term
Phylogenetic analysis of the C-E1 sequences was conducted by direct sequencing of the RT-nPCR products and alignment with determined by nucleotide sequencing followed by composition of a phylogenetic tree.
Gene_expression (products) of nPCR
1) Confidence 0.65 Published 2007 Journal Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi Section Body Doc Link 18476583 Disease Relevance 0.08 Pain Relevance 0
In contrast, real-time PCR and nPCR detected 17 samples that were not identified by antigen ELISA.
Gene_expression (detected) of nPCR
2) Confidence 0.49 Published 2004 Journal BMC Infect Dis Section Body Doc Link PMC434506 Disease Relevance 0.22 Pain Relevance 0
By antigen ELISA 18 of 52 (34.6%) samples were positive for NoV, whereas both real-time PCR and nPCR detected 26 (50%), respectively.
Gene_expression (detected) of nPCR
3) Confidence 0.49 Published 2004 Journal BMC Infect Dis Section Body Doc Link PMC434506 Disease Relevance 0.24 Pain Relevance 0
2 p = 0.02)) of nPCR, the overall poor performance of both the nPCR and virus culture assays was unexpected.
Gene_expression (unexpected) of nPCR
4) Confidence 0.38 Published 2001 Journal BMC Infect Dis Section Body Doc Link PMC57742 Disease Relevance 0.59 Pain Relevance 0
2 p = 0.02)) of nPCR, the overall poor performance of both the nPCR and virus culture assays was unexpected.
Gene_expression (unexpected) of nPCR
5) Confidence 0.33 Published 2001 Journal BMC Infect Dis Section Body Doc Link PMC57742 Disease Relevance 0.53 Pain Relevance 0

General Comments

This test has worked.

Personal tools
Namespaces

Variants
Actions
Navigation
Toolbox