INT212357

From wiki-pain
Revision as of 10:14, 22 September 2012 by Daniel (Talk | contribs)

(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search
Context Info
Confidence 0.31
First Reported 2007
Last Reported 2010
Negated 0
Speculated 0
Reported most in Body
Documents 2
Total Number 3
Disease Relevance 0.53
Pain Relevance 0.15

This is a graph with borders and nodes. Maybe there is an Imagemap used so the nodes may be linking to some Pages.

Anatomy Link Frequency
blood 1
TNS3 (Homo sapiens)
Pain Link Frequency Relevance Heat
cva 2 93.92 High High
ischemia 2 92.44 High High
Lasting pain 4 53.76 Quite High
Pain 59 50.00 Quite Low
Pain score 4 8.68 Low Low
spinal-cord stimulation 34 5.00 Very Low Very Low Very Low
Spinal cord 4 5.00 Very Low Very Low Very Low
tolerance 4 5.00 Very Low Very Low Very Low
painful pain 2 5.00 Very Low Very Low Very Low
Biofeedback 2 5.00 Very Low Very Low Very Low
Disease Link Frequency Relevance Heat
Cv General 4 Under Development 4 93.92 High High
Dyspnea 56 86.56 High High
Injury 1 59.88 Quite High
Increased Venous Pressure Under Development 2 54.48 Quite High
Pain 32 53.76 Quite High
Neck Pain 31 50.00 Quite Low
Cardiovascular Disease 4 5.00 Very Low Very Low Very Low
Cerebrovascular Disease 4 5.00 Very Low Very Low Very Low
Complex Regional Pain Syndromes 4 5.00 Very Low Very Low Very Low
Coronary Heart Disease 2 5.00 Very Low Very Low Very Low

Sentences Mentioned In

Key: Protein Mutation Event Anatomy Negation Speculation Pain term Disease term
As the results indicate, participants receiving either the TENS or control treatments did not present any clinically visible improvements after 24 weeks.
TENS Binding (receiving) of
1) Confidence 0.31 Published 2007 Journal Chiropr Osteopat Section Body Doc Link PMC1963325 Disease Relevance 0.11 Pain Relevance 0.05
Fig. 1Set-up of experiment 1: five blocks of baseline measurements followed by 5-min measurement with TENS in randomized frequencies 1 to 5
TENS Binding (measurement) of
2) Confidence 0.29 Published 2010 Journal Acta Neurochir (Wien) Section Body Doc Link PMC2901492 Disease Relevance 0.09 Pain Relevance 0
Since cervical TENS did not have a clinically relevant effect on systemic blood pressure and heart rate, TENS can be safely applied to those patients.
TENS Binding (applied) of in blood
3) Confidence 0.29 Published 2010 Journal Acta Neurochir (Wien) Section Body Doc Link PMC2901492 Disease Relevance 0.33 Pain Relevance 0.09

General Comments

This test has worked.

Personal tools
Namespaces

Variants
Actions
Navigation
Toolbox