INT46148

From wiki-pain
Revision as of 17:42, 21 September 2012 by Daniel (Talk | contribs)

(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search
Context Info
Confidence 0.31
First Reported 1983
Last Reported 2010
Negated 0
Speculated 0
Reported most in Body
Documents 5
Total Number 5
Disease Relevance 1.58
Pain Relevance 0.64

This is a graph with borders and nodes. Maybe there is an Imagemap used so the nodes may be linking to some Pages.

nuclear envelope (LBR) small molecule metabolic process (LBR) nucleus (LBR)
DNA binding (LBR)
Anatomy Link Frequency
PTA 1
nerve 1
T cells 1
LBR (Homo sapiens)
Pain Link Frequency Relevance Heat
narcan 2 97.12 Very High Very High Very High
antagonist 1 96.76 Very High Very High Very High
opiate 2 96.32 Very High Very High Very High
nerve block 1 93.44 High High
lidocaine 2 92.12 High High
Arthritis 62 81.20 Quite High
headache 1 72.72 Quite High
rheumatoid arthritis 22 50.00 Quite Low
hypoalgesia 1 48.08 Quite Low
interneuron 1 25.00 Low Low
Disease Link Frequency Relevance Heat
Moyamoya Disease 7 99.44 Very High Very High Very High
Nociception 5 87.76 High High
Anxiety Disorder 1 82.56 Quite High
Hematoma 1 81.60 Quite High
Arthritis 70 81.20 Quite High
Cerebral Haemorrage 1 74.44 Quite High
Headache 1 72.72 Quite High
Hodgkin's Disease 77 66.08 Quite High
Lymphatic System Cancer 25 65.52 Quite High
Anaplastic Large Cell Lymphoma 19 61.84 Quite High

Sentences Mentioned In

Key: Protein Mutation Event Anatomy Negation Speculation Pain term Disease term
To characterize the central pathways for the LBR, we investigated the interaction between the LBR and the three components of the blink reflex (R1, R2, and R3) by delivering laser pulses to the perioral or supraorbital regions before or after electrical stimulation of the supraorbital nerve at various interstimulus intervals.
LBR Binding (interaction) of in nerve
1) Confidence 0.31 Published 2002 Journal J. Neurophysiol. Section Abstract Doc Link 11877513 Disease Relevance 0.37 Pain Relevance 0.52
None of the 907 cases of moyamoya disease reported in Japan has been associated with either PTA or PHA.
PHA Binding (associated) of in PTA associated with moyamoya disease
2) Confidence 0.31 Published 1983 Journal J. Neurosurg. Section Abstract Doc Link 6864274 Disease Relevance 0.81 Pain Relevance 0.07
However, it should be pointed out that PHA activated T cells contain intracellular CYB5B, but do not express it on the cell surface, since propidium iodide non-excluding (i.e. non viable and therefore naturally permeabilized due to loss of membrane integrity) PHA activated T cells bind anti-R23.1 mAb (unpublished observations).
PHA Binding (bind) of in T cells
3) Confidence 0.04 Published 2010 Journal Mol Cancer Section Body Doc Link PMC2829491 Disease Relevance 0.31 Pain Relevance 0
For PHA as a stimulus, the IC50 of free MP was 0.021 ?
PHA Binding (stimulus) of
4) Confidence 0.03 Published 2008 Journal International Journal of Nanomedicine Section Body Doc Link PMC2626937 Disease Relevance 0.08 Pain Relevance 0.04
For PHA as a stimulus, the 3 day IC50 of free MP was 0.029 ?
PHA Binding (stimulus) of
5) Confidence 0.03 Published 2008 Journal International Journal of Nanomedicine Section Body Doc Link PMC2626937 Disease Relevance 0 Pain Relevance 0

General Comments

This test has worked.

Personal tools
Namespaces

Variants
Actions
Navigation
Toolbox